Article

2008-09-05 Europe

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2008-09-05 00:00|| || Front Page|| [4 views ] Top
File under: Taliban

#1 Being a "Gut Check" or not, the act of parading around dead soldiers personal effects is reprehensible. Some newspapers and magazines take the low road in reporting things we do not wish to see or read. This is the ugly part of the news.

The truth of the battle in Afghanistan is the duplicity involved with working with the Afghan people that do not want foreign soldiers there and the religious ties they have with fellow muslims. When given a public stage, must Afghanis would defer to their local Imam. Thus, the people's loyalties are divided. Each must serve one government publicly to restore electrical power, water, heat, and infrastructure. Then they must adhere to hardline islamist teachings during Ramadan.

When hiring a local guide, you never TRULY know whose side he's on. Once a trusted ally is contacted, you never know if the Taliban came to his house later that night and threatened/kidnapped his wife and children to coerce him into being complicit. Some Afghanistanis are just plain traitorous. Rival drug warlords compete for power in addition to religious fanatics. The dynamics of rebuilding this nation were GROSSLY under-estimated by the Bush regime.

Best of luck to the French people in their efforts to help settle this lawless area. No one likes to be lied to and ambushed. 140 to 10 soldiers is a slaughter. Parading their remains and desecrating their bodies is just plain low. Un-islamic even by their standards.

Paris Match has the right to report on this atrocity, but did a very poor job framing the story. You can report on the Taliban and their viewpoints as a journalist without sounding like a cheerleader.

Posted by Unavins Dingle3445 2008-09-05 09:06|| 2008-09-05 09:06|| Front Page Top

#2 Media have entirely on their own volition made themselves the object of loathing and well-justified contempt. As with other institutions or groups, the good ones among them have faced a choice (to resist the collapse of standards and self-respect) and done nothing, putting themselves at moral risk like their pitiful peers.

My impression from the start has been, contrary to the comment above, that the Bush administration has always had a steely-eyed view of the challenges of "developing" Afghanistan, and appropriately from the outset set our sights very low there. Denial of a base to the enemy and just barely keeping the lid on at minimal cost would constitute complete strategic success, IMHO.

Posted by Verlaine 2008-09-05 12:13|| 2008-09-05 12:13|| Front Page Top

#3 For some reason this movie quote comes to mind when I consider France and its reaction to this.

Wyatt Earp: You skin that smoke wagon and we'll see what happens!
Johnny Tyler: Listen mister, I'm getting awful tired of your...
[Wyatt slaps him]
Wyatt Earp: Are you gonna do something? Or just stand there and bleed?

Posted by swksvolFF 2008-09-05 12:49|| 2008-09-05 12:49|| Front Page Top

#4 Media have entirely on their own volition made themselves allies of the enemy in order to show "both sides" of the story. This crew would have covered up Buchenwald to get an interview on what happened at Wolfsschanze.

Posted by Nimble Spemble 2008-09-05 12:52|| 2008-09-05 12:52|| Front Page Top

23:58 OldSpook
23:42 Frank G
23:41 Frank G
23:37 EHLTB
23:24 Beavis
23:12 OldSpook
23:10 Whavish Untervehr4912
23:06 Whavish Untervehr4912
23:05 European Conservative
23:02 OldSpook
22:56 Frank G
22:42 Steve White
22:40 OldSpook
22:26 Mike
22:23 no mo uro
22:17 no mo uro
22:07 3dc
21:59 g(r)omgoru
21:57 g(r)omgoru
21:27 ed
21:27 MarkZ
21:26 Adriane
21:23 bruce
21:22 Frank G