Article

2009-10-16 India-Pakistan

Pakistan nuclear weapons vulnerable to attack?

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Maggie Ebbuter2991 2009-10-16 12:39|| || Front Page|| [7 views ] Top

#1 If they are vulnerable to attack, the sensible and responsible thing to do is to go ahead and attack. Allowing highly dangerous weapons to remain vulnerable is irresponsible. Eventually the results will be catastrophic.

Posted by Richard of Oregon 2009-10-16 16:18|| 2009-10-16 16:18|| Front Page Top

#2 These attacks are just tests for the inevitable push to obtain these materials. Sound intelligence states that reaction time, response force, and "feeling up" of external assets (Spys) is the reason to test your capabilities on something other than the main target first.

I assure you, designs on the Pak nukes is the highest priority for these folks. Seeing as they have been edged out of Iraq, Afghanistan, and are losing money as well as personnel, the natural path is for them to take the arsenal while they can.

An attempt will be made, and india is first target.

We need a wally world team trained specifically for the extraction of these and we need it right now.

A full sandtable with as much intel needs to be presented because this is not an IF, it is a When.

The Pakistanis need to understand that our interest is also theirs as India will not stand by in the Idle if struck. They have no compunction at all with using full force retaliation.

Kashmir is again just an agitation, yet a very big thing in the long run if you account for the foreigners (Al Qaeda) are the ones stirring up the war again.

Please get on this immediately. Last night was the night I knew I would see. Big and bad things are about to happen, the good Angels will stand by.

Posted by newc">newc 2009-10-16 17:58|| 2009-10-16 17:58|| Front Page Top

#3 Offer the Pak top government and army officials exile and money in return for us "holding" their nukes for them.

Posted by Maggie Ebbuter2991 2009-10-16 18:15|| 2009-10-16 18:15|| Front Page Top

#4 Booby-trap them.

Posted by mojo">mojo 2009-10-16 18:31|| 2009-10-16 18:31|| Front Page Top

#5 OTOH MIL FORUMS POSTERS > ITO proclaim that the major Muslim States of TURKEY, SYRIA, EGYPT, + IRAN, ETC. can never achieve "great power" recognition = status [also read, RADICAL ISLAM'S OWG-NWO CALIPHATE/GLOBAL ISLAMIST-JIHADIST STATE]widout Nuclear Weapons.

Just as CHINA can not achieve SUPERPOWER STATUS whle maintaining its traditional ISOLATIONISM - CHINA MUST EMBRACE ITS BIRTH PANGS, NOT AVOID IT.

Posted by JosephMendiola">JosephMendiola 2009-10-16 19:32|| na]">[na] 2009-10-16 19:32|| Front Page Top

#6 The major Muslim states won't acquire major power status even with nukes, JosephM. They'll just be handled a little more delicately. Does anyone think of North Korea as a major power?

Posted by trailing wife">trailing wife 2009-10-16 22:57|| 2009-10-16 22:57|| Front Page Top

23:59 gorb
23:29 JosephMendiola
23:24 JosephMendiola
23:22 Cornsilk Blondie
23:01 trailing wife
22:58 Skunky Glins****
22:57 trailing wife
22:55 Old Patriot
22:46 gorb
22:45 Old Patriot
22:35 Unurt Peacock3354
22:33 rhodesiafever
22:27 trailing wife
22:27 Frank G
22:26 Frank G
22:25 trailing wife
22:23 trailing wife
22:06 abu do you love
22:00 trailing wife
21:46 SR-71
21:42 abu do you love
21:42 Maggie Ebbuter2991
21:34 abu do you love
21:33 Iblis