Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 01/29/2011 View Fri 01/28/2011 View Thu 01/27/2011 View Wed 01/26/2011 View Tue 01/25/2011 View Mon 01/24/2011 View Sun 01/23/2011
1
2011-01-29 Home Front: Politix
TSA Chief Stops Further Airport Private Security - TSA Union Gleeful
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by  Anonymoose 2011-01-29 09:00|| || Front Page|| [10 views ]  Top

#1 scumbag unions.
Posted by newc 2011-01-29 12:19||   2011-01-29 12:19|| Front Page Top

#2 I thought I remembered that back in the early days of 2001-2002, when TSA was being formed -- didn't everyone promise they would never be unionized?

Must be those "faulty memories" Winston Smith was talking about.
Posted by Bill 2011-01-29 12:32||   2011-01-29 12:32|| Front Page Top

#3 Just another example of unions strangling and sucking the life blood out of our country.
Posted by JohnQC 2011-01-29 13:05||   2011-01-29 13:05|| Front Page Top

#4 Unions have served their purpose, but now they are the weight that is dragging this country into poverty and stagnation. They need to be destroyed and their power broken.
Posted by DarthVader 2011-01-29 13:08||   2011-01-29 13:08|| Front Page Top

#5 Did the AFGE get an obamacare waiver yet?
Posted by Muggsy Glink 2011-01-29 13:44||   2011-01-29 13:44|| Front Page Top

#6 "The nation is secure in the sense that the safety of our skies will not be left in the hands of the lowest-bidder contractor, as it was before 9/11"

To imply that 9/11 was the result of private security is beyond dishonest. And personally, I would rather have a low bidder contractor who actually does the job instead of "who gives a crap?" unremovable union employees.

Posted by SteveS 2011-01-29 15:14||   2011-01-29 15:14|| Front Page Top

#7 "The nation is secure in the sense that the safety of our skies will not be left in the hands of the lowest-bidder contractor, as it was before 9/11"

In essence, doesn't the government get away with the lowest bid process for the [non-unionized] military. They raise and lower bonuses to argument base pay to attract just enough people to fill the ranks?
Posted by Procopius2k 2011-01-29 17:20||   2011-01-29 17:20|| Front Page Top

#8 My gut instinct tells me that we are at a tipping point in this country regarding socialism and unions. When it tips public opinion will shift against them hard and even the good will applied to cops, firemen and teachers won't protect them from harsh feelings because of their unions.
Posted by rjschwarz 2011-01-29 17:28||   2011-01-29 17:28|| Front Page Top

#9 From the supposed low-bid contractor (yeah, sure) to the final, no-bid contractor. And you'd better not criticize their policies.
Posted by KBK 2011-01-29 19:09||   2011-01-29 19:09|| Front Page Top

#10 Question
Since the TSA is setting itself up as THE inspection system,can we sue the shit out of them whenevr the next Bomber figures a clever way to sneak something illicit on board?
Betcha they'll say no, an thousands of lawyers will say YES, HELL YES.
Posted by Redneck Jim 2011-01-30 00:02||   2011-01-30 00:02|| Front Page Top

00:05 JosephMendiola
00:02 Redneck Jim
23:39 Secret Asian Man
23:30 gorb
23:09 JosephMendiola
23:06 JosephMendiola
22:56 JosephMendiola
22:48 pan
22:41 Pappy
22:40 JosephMendiola
22:34 DarthVader
22:20 Charles
22:18 Charles
22:10 Charles
22:08 Charles
22:04 Charles
21:56 Hellfish
21:50 swksvolFF
21:40 crosspatch
21:36 Dave UK
21:16 Matt
21:10 swksvolFF
20:50 Frank G
20:32 trailing wife









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com