Article

2011-04-14 Britain

David Cameron: migration threatens our way of life

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by tipper 2011-04-14 03:50|| || Front Page|| [2 views ] Top

#1 Gee, it's as though they don't teach real history anymore. Here's one principle from history - it's more fun doing it to others than to have others do it to you.

Posted by Procopius2k 2011-04-14 08:48|| 2011-04-14 08:48|| Front Page Top

#2 The whole idea was for liberals to destroy Britain. Same thing with letting millions of illegal Mexicans into America. It's soft genocide.

Posted by gromky 2011-04-14 09:37|| 2011-04-14 09:37|| Front Page Top

#3 Soft genocide...sounds like an extremely politically incorrect thing to say but exactly the kind of thing an @$$hole like Bill Clinton would do. I like it.

I've been thinking some lately about this Lybian thing. I was wondering if it really could be all about oil since I know good and well it has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with any humanitarian considerations as has been claimed. But then, how could it be about oil? Daffy kept the oil flowing, did he not? So what's the problem? I mean, really?

That's when it occurred to me that it might have something to do with immigration and colonization. It seems that Europe lately has been undergoing a process of reverse colonization. People from former colonies like Pakistan and Algeria have been migrating to Europe and, in their own disorganized way, colonizing Europe.

Have Cameron and Sarkozy gotten wise to it? Could it be? And, if so, what would they do about it?

If you think about why people leave cat boxes like Lybia, Algeria or Pakistan it's obvious that the conditions created by the post-colonial governments and the prevailing Muslim cultures there are hell on earth.

Could it be that Cameron and Sarkozy are planning to re-colonize North Africa with the aim of making those places more livable? Do they think they could stem or even reverse the tide of migration from the cat boxes to Europe? Or is that too sinister a thought to even think about?

Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2011-04-14 12:21|| 2011-04-14 12:21|| Front Page Top

#4 I suspect NATO acting in Libya in an attempt to halt Kadaffi from killing civilians indeed has to do with trying prevent a massive influx of refugees from crossing the Med.

From places like Bahrain it would be difficult to take a boat to Europe (would required getting through the Suez Canal), but from Libya any old fishing vessel would do.

Posted by Chemist 2011-04-14 19:11|| 2011-04-14 19:11|| Front Page Top

22:59 Anguper Hupomosing9418
22:49 Anguper Hupomosing9418
22:46 Anguper Hupomosing9418
22:42 Anguper Hupomosing9418
22:02 Frank G
22:01 Willy
21:47 Barbara Skolaut
21:40 tu3031
21:20 newc
21:19 Frank G
21:18 newc
21:15 newc
20:51 Frank G
20:50 Bill Clinton
20:40 Frank G
20:26 Rambler in Virginia
19:47 Barbara Skolaut
19:43 tu3031
19:38 Nimble Spemble
19:23 Chemist
19:11 Chemist
19:02 Bright Pebbles
18:50 Thing From Snowy Mountain
18:33 Zebulon Thranter9685