Article

2012-01-12 Science & Technology

Air Force Launches Suborbital Ballistic Missile In Weapons Test

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Uncle Phester 2012-01-12 00:00|| || Front Page|| [5 views ] Top

#1 SOP. Pull one out and launch it from V-berg. Nothing to see here.

Posted by Muggsy Johnson7466 2012-01-12 01:19|| 2012-01-12 01:19|| Front Page Top

#2 Could be a nice launch platform for MIRV'ed kinetic kill vehicles or an SM-3 derivative that can reach out even further. That'd be fun to watch...

Posted by M. Murcek 2012-01-12 13:40|| 2012-01-12 13:40|| Front Page Top

#3 Uh, they'd be Multiple Independently Targetable, since they would be going after sats, and therefor not doing any reentry, but you get the idea...

Posted by M. Murcek 2012-01-12 13:43|| 2012-01-12 13:43|| Front Page Top

#4 All ICBMs are suborbital otherwise, what would be the point? The "Ballistic" part means that the missile follows a parabolic path once the engines cut off.

So Muggsy, I agree.

Posted by Mike Ramsey 2012-01-12 13:55|| 2012-01-12 13:55|| Front Page Top

#5 A non-suborbital, could go into orbit and circle around until given orders to deorbit, dropping on a target with minimal warning. Then your only problem is if something breaks in the harsh environment up there.

I'm sure we have some treaties (or used to) that outlawed that sort of thing during the cold war.

Posted by rjschwarz 2012-01-12 14:45|| 2012-01-12 14:45|| Front Page Top

#6 I guess it would then be called an orbital weapon. :-)

Apollo and the space shuttle were not ICBMs either.

I will grant you that the Mercury spacecraft did ride on top of a modified Redstone ICBM booster. But both Mercury-Redstone 3 and 4 were suborbital shots.

Posted by Mike Ramsey 2012-01-12 16:51|| 2012-01-12 16:51|| Front Page Top

#7 Muggsy and Mike: OK, not so interesting.....<sigh>

;->

Posted by Uncle Phester 2012-01-12 18:01|| 2012-01-12 18:01|| Front Page Top

#8 Orbital weapons are banned by treaty.

Posted by Steve White 2012-01-12 18:05|| 2012-01-12 18:05|| Front Page Top

#9 Define "weapon".
Only WMD are banned. Rods from God would be legal since it is "conventional".

Posted by DarthVader 2012-01-12 18:35|| 2012-01-12 18:35|| Front Page Top

#10 Muggsy,
If they weren't, our ASAT weapons would be much further along....

Posted by Mike Ramsey 2012-01-12 18:36|| 2012-01-12 18:36|| Front Page Top

23:52 USN, Ret.
23:11 Barbara
22:47 tipover
22:26 RandomJD
21:57 Ebboluling Theamp7972
21:34 Frank G
21:34 Frank G
21:33 Frank G
20:58 Anonymoose
20:47 Uncle Phester
20:17 Rambler in Virginia
20:05 swksvolFF
19:49 gorb
19:44 Barbara
19:22 Ebbang Uluque6305
19:11 Cluque Untervehr3229
19:04 Thing From Snowy Mountain
18:56 Ebbang Uluque6305
18:55 Deacon Blues
18:45 Glenmore
18:36 Mike Ramsey
18:35 DarthVader
18:30 Mike Ramsey
18:26 Pappy