Article

2013-08-26 -Lurid Crime Tales-

10-Year-Old Girl Accused Of Raping 4-Year-Old During Game Of 'Doctor'

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2013-08-26 11:58|| || Front Page|| [11135 views ] Top

#1 There should be limits.

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2013-08-26 12:59|| 2013-08-26 12:59|| Front Page Top

#2 Anyone ask Whoopie if it was 'rape-rape' or not?

Where did the 10 YO learn to do that (assuming it was what I think it was...)? Mommy and her 'friends' perhaps?

Posted by CrazyFool 2013-08-26 13:12|| 2013-08-26 13:12|| Front Page Top

#3 According to the link it was NOT rape, or anything like Rape.

A very slanted headline, and Rantburg should be ashamed.

Posted by Redneck Jim 2013-08-26 16:03|| 2013-08-26 16:03|| Front Page Top

#4 A very slanted headline

1. It's what the article title says. Neither Fred or "Rantburg" made it up.

2. The opening paragraph reads:

A 10-year-old girl is facing rape charges from playing an alleged game of doctor with a group of children from her housing complex.

Now maybe it's me, but that opening paragraph rather backs up the headline, no?

and Rantburg should be ashamed

For what? CBS Houston's lousy journalistic practices?

Posted by Pappy 2013-08-26 17:51|| 2013-08-26 17:51|| Front Page Top

#5 It's a local news story from Houston. Local news always spike the headline to be more 'sensational'.

Posted by CrazyFool 2013-08-26 17:55|| 2013-08-26 17:55|| Front Page Top

#6 I could not gage the seriousness of the situation, are we talking doc mcstuffins or mylie cyrus levels?

Posted by swksvolFF 2013-08-26 18:09|| 2013-08-26 18:09|| Front Page Top

#7 "For what"
For printing this without checking, we should CHECK.

Posted by Redneck Jim 2013-08-26 18:52|| 2013-08-26 18:52|| Front Page Top

#8 LOL! are you high? drunk?

Posted by Frank G 2013-08-26 18:54|| 2013-08-26 18:54|| Front Page Top

#9 For printing this without checking, we should CHECK.

I thought it was being run in the original form and being mocked accordingly....

Posted by DarthVader 2013-08-26 20:57|| 2013-08-26 20:57|| Front Page Top

#10 For printing this without checking, we should CHECK.

'We"? "WE"???

Let's see... it was run VERBATIM from the LINKED site, with Fred's CUSTOMARY added social commentary.

NO DIFFERENT FROM ANY OTHER ARTICLE FRED HAS WANTED TO COMMENT ABOUT.

Maybe we COULD have spent OUR time and OUR Money calling the Houston Police.

Maybe.

/GEE! This ALL CAPS is FUN!! And so are EXCLAMATION POINTS!!!!!

Posted by Pappy 2013-08-26 21:23|| 2013-08-26 21:23|| Front Page Top

#11 You sure are whining a lot for a redneck, Jim.

Posted by whitecollar redneck 2013-08-26 21:58|| 2013-08-26 21:58|| Front Page Top

#12 This should not have made it out the front door of the house, let alone all the way to the police station. Is there no common sense anymore? Honestly. Sticking a ten year old with a felony. Great. As if this kind of behavior is any kind indicator of how they will turn out when they grow up.

Laws have become the religion of this country. Some clown writes a law with his blinders on, and everybody tries to follow it to the letter because, as we all know, words are perfect. And this is how we end up.

Posted by gorb 2013-08-26 21:59|| 2013-08-26 21:59|| Front Page Top

23:43 JosephMendiola
23:02 3dc
22:54 Zenobia Floger6220
22:45 Besoeker
22:39 OldSpook
22:36 OldSpook
22:32 OldSpook
22:24 Besoeker
22:11 Uneaper Spairong8790
22:07 Uneaper Spairong8790
22:04 USN, Ret.
22:00 OldSpook
21:59 gorb
21:58 whitecollar redneck
21:55 Classical_Liberal
21:51 USN, Ret.
21:47 newc
21:46 Uneaper Spairong8790
21:42 USN, Ret.
21:38 Pappy
21:23 mossomo
21:23 Pappy
21:09 OldSpook
20:57 DarthVader