Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 08/24/2014 View Sat 08/23/2014 View Fri 08/22/2014 View Thu 08/21/2014 View Wed 08/20/2014 View Tue 08/19/2014 View Mon 08/18/2014
1
2014-08-24 Israel-Palestine-Jordan
VDH: Sherman in Gaza
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Frank G 2014-08-24 12:17|| || Front Page|| [2 views ]  Top
 File under: Hamas 

#1 Civil War historian the late Shelby Foote wrote that the South was destined to lose the war from the beginning, "they never had a snowball's chance in hell." There was no lack of elan, capable leadership, dedication, or bravery in the South. Nor was there a lack of knowledgeable woodsmen or men trained in fieldcraft, or an excess of haute, mounted aristocrats.

As in most wars and conflicts, victory eludes the poorly armed and supplied force. Supply and logistics are everything.



Posted by Besoeker 2014-08-24 13:45||   2014-08-24 13:45|| Front Page Top

#2 love the graphic
Posted by 3dc 2014-08-24 13:50||   2014-08-24 13:50|| Front Page Top

#3 I'm not quite so sure, Besoeker. I'm hardly a Civil War expert, but it seemed as though it was fairly close--not so much that the South close to winning but that the North was close to giving up. As VDH noted, if Lincoln had lost the election the result might have been a de-facto separation: an effective victory for the South.

And, of course, if the South hadn't actually started shooting, it isn't obvious that the North would have started, and once again the result might have been a de-facto separation.
Posted by James  2014-08-24 15:15|| http://idontknowbut.blogspot.com  2014-08-24 15:15|| Front Page Top

#4 The North giving up is very accurate James. Many in the North were sure it would all be over in a matter of a few months. Ever the adept politician and statesman, Lincoln pulled a rabbit out of his hat with the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863. Davis was no match for Lincoln, either in political acumen or leadership. Had the husband of Mary Anna Custis been fully in charge, outcomes might have gone differently.
Posted by Besoeker 2014-08-24 15:53||   2014-08-24 15:53|| Front Page Top

#5 No one could write a compelling historical narrative as Shelby Foote could. As an almost retired professional Historian I should dismiss him for his lack of citations/bibliography. I can't. This writer spent decades writing his 3 vol. opus. And each word rings true...
Posted by borgboy 2014-08-24 22:42||   2014-08-24 22:42|| Front Page Top

23:46 genbara11
23:21 gorb
22:59 Anon1
22:53 JosephMendiola
22:42 borgboy
22:22 Frank G
21:58 BigEdLB
21:57 BigEdLB
21:27 CrazyFool
21:01 Ebbomosh Hupemp2664
20:58 Pappy
20:52 Pappy
20:50 Bright Pebbles
20:42 49 Pan
20:33 CrazyFool
20:30 Bright Pebbles
20:09 Procopius2k
20:08 Procopius2k
20:06 Procopius2k
19:25 Airandee
19:22 Barbara
19:15 AlanC
19:09 SteveS
18:35 Anguper Hupomosing9418









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com