Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 09/27/2017 View Tue 09/26/2017 View Mon 09/25/2017 View Sun 09/24/2017 View Sat 09/23/2017 View Fri 09/22/2017 View Thu 09/21/2017
1
2017-09-27 Home Front: Culture Wars
Ask Matt Labash: How to Make Peace Over Trump and the NFL Kneelers
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by JohnQC 2017-09-27 11:06|| || Front Page|| [11 views ]  Top

#1 The realist in me fears that it might be later than we think.

Were anyone thinking.
Posted by Skidmark 2017-09-27 15:34||   2017-09-27 15:34|| Front Page Top

#2 Yet another commentator writing a history-free and context-free screed, stretching to grasp the role of impartial observer.

Tea Party anyone?

I recall the efforts to remain civil in the 1970's when the techniques being practiced today were first developed to stop the pro-life movement. Patience and courtesy totally wasted on the unworthy, like tossing pearls to swine.

I made a very interesting observation a few days ago: the Aramaic word for "Enemy" entirely incorporates, as the base word, the Aramaic word for "Enmity": Thus, when Jesus said to love your enemy, He was actually objecting to the enmity you would have to have, to qualify to have an enemy. There is a difference between HAVING an enemy and BEING an enemy: If they hate you without a cause, then you are THEIR enemy, but they are not YOUR enemy if you don't first have enmity toward them.

The upshot is that Jesus was forbidding enmity, but did not forbid the observation that someone has enmity toward you, and thus is dangerous in the same way a hungry bear or Lion would be dangerous (He did that all the time, and modified his behavior to avoid danger). You can sympathize with a hungry bear, but you don't give it what it wants if what it wants is YOU for dinner.

I got this while reading the Book of Esther: Mordecai did not have any enmity toward Haman, just no respect, probably because Haman was the kind of guy who, when disrespected, embraced and welcomed enmity.

Posted by Ptah 2017-09-27 19:13||   2017-09-27 19:13|| Front Page Top

#3 That was lovely, Ptah, and a very useful way of approaching the subject. I have missed you thinking aloud, but presumably you have other, more urgent projects nowadays.
Posted by trailing wife 2017-09-27 21:20||   2017-09-27 21:20|| Front Page Top

22:32 rjschwarz
22:29 rjschwarz
22:28 rjschwarz
22:25 rjschwarz
21:48 Frank G
21:48 Thravimp Lover of the Antelope7006
21:20 trailing wife
21:18 bbrewer126
20:30 Frank G
20:16 Dale
20:02 Frank G
19:55 Frank G
19:42 swksvolFF
19:13 Ptah
19:05 Procopius2k
18:58 John Frum
18:46 Alaska Paul
18:39 charger
18:37 Alaska Paul
18:33 charger
18:30 charger
18:29 Seeking cure for ignorance
18:26 charger
18:23 Bobby









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com