Archived material Access restricted Article

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 07/14/2019 View Sat 07/13/2019 View Fri 07/12/2019 View Thu 07/11/2019 View Wed 07/10/2019 View Tue 07/09/2019 View Mon 07/08/2019
2019-07-14 -Lurid Crime Tales-
Trump issues Jeffrey Epstein challenge to press: 'Find out the people that went to the island'
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2019-07-14 00:00|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [6483 views ]  Top

#1 Sanity, once again. Straight talk, and sense.
Posted by Lex 2019-07-14 01:24||   2019-07-14 01:24|| Front Page Top

#2 Another prog pearl-clutcher balloon popped. The narrative will now shift to "He wasn't "there" there, but..." Dan Rather to the deepfake control center, please...
Posted by M. Murcek 2019-07-14 06:04||   2019-07-14 06:04|| Front Page Top

#3 The 'free press' isn't gonna do jack shit about this, 'cuz it'll make Democrats look bad.
Posted by Raj 2019-07-14 06:58||   2019-07-14 06:58|| Front Page Top

#4 Modern media is all about covering stories that make demoncrats look bad.

With a pillow.

Until they stop moving.
Posted by DarthVader 2019-07-14 09:55||   2019-07-14 09:55|| Front Page Top

#5 the NYTimes had a piece on Epstein a few days ago including the people who partied with him post conviction.

the piece actually name Donald Trump as someone who did not party with Epstein post conviction

how this got past the editors is unknown
Posted by lord garth 2019-07-14 11:58||   2019-07-14 11:58|| Front Page Top

#6 Lord Garth, the favorable mention of Trump was buried far beneath the fold. S.t. like paragraph #17
Posted by Lex 2019-07-14 12:38||   2019-07-14 12:38|| Front Page Top

#7 how this got past the editors is unknown

obviously they didn't have their coordinated response in place yet.
Posted by gorb 2019-07-14 13:05||   2019-07-14 13:05|| Front Page Top

#8 the NYT piece is
Posted by lord garth 2019-07-14 13:11||   2019-07-14 13:11|| Front Page Top

#9 Did it mention the Clintons? Perhaps the editor was too focused on keeping the Clintons from being mentioned...
Posted by CrazyFool 2019-07-14 13:54||   2019-07-14 13:54|| Front Page Top

#10 I'd like to think that some of the folks at the NYT are realistic enough to know that Bill Clinton is going to be in trouble for this and Trump isn't and they are trying to let their readers down gently.

Of course I might be imagining better motives and more intelligence than actually exist.
Posted by lord garth 2019-07-14 14:34||   2019-07-14 14:34|| Front Page Top

#11 The press can't afford to do it. It'd probably annihilate most of the prominent Democrat men in both politics and probably media. I guess we'll just add pedophile to the Democrat= Nazi, KKK, subhuman vermin.
Posted by Silentbrick 2019-07-14 14:57||   2019-07-14 14:57|| Front Page Top

#12 annihilatemost of the prominent Democrat men in both politics

I read it as "annihilate most of the prominent Democrat men in both parties" and it made sense. Funny how the subconscious works.
Posted by M. Murcek 2019-07-14 20:57||   2019-07-14 20:57|| Front Page Top

22:33 james
22:08 Snavimble Bucket1794
21:36 Procopius2k
21:17 trailing wife
21:02 trailing wife
20:57 M. Murcek
20:46 SteveS
20:45 SteveS
20:13 crazyhorse
20:01 DarthVader
19:25 rammer
19:20 rammer
19:06 JohnQC
19:02 JohnQC
18:31 The peanut gallery
18:18 Lex
18:06 trailing wife
17:22 Frank G
17:02 chris
17:01 chris
16:59 chris
16:40 Bertie Snereting9692
16:11 jpal
15:54 jpal

Search WWW Search