Article

2021-05-03 Economy

Warren Buffett - 'Costs Are Up, Up, Up. We're Seeing Substantial Inflation' As Powell, Yellen See Nothing

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Besoeker 2021-05-03 00:52|| || Front Page|| [9 views ] Top

#1 It's YOUR party, IDIOT.

ALL democrats are IDIOTS

Just wait to see what this does to the poor you Sadists.

Posted by newc 2021-05-03 02:13|| 2021-05-03 02:13|| Front Page Top

#2 Carter years return but on steroids.

Posted by Dale 2021-05-03 05:46|| 2021-05-03 05:46|| Front Page Top

#3 Keep printing money without backing and you don't expect Venezuelan economics?

If the government takes 10 percent of your income its called taxes. If the government cheapens (re:debases) the currency so that it has 10% less value its call 'inflation'. The effect is the same.

Posted by Procopius2k 2021-05-03 08:21|| 2021-05-03 08:21|| Front Page Top

#4 Easily our nation's best and most experienced economist is Larry Summers. He's not very conservative, and he just ripped the Biden admin's economic policies to shreds in a long interview with Martin Wolf of the Financial Times. Larry Summers says this is a repeat of the mistakes of the Johnson Admjnistration and that, yes, we're going back to the 1970s -- inflation and recession together.

This FT interview's behind the paywall, so here are some choice bits -- note the math. Summers says that the Biden advisors aren't even bothering g to do the math anymore. In short, the sums being spent are so wildly out of line with even liberal Keynesian analysis as to constitute a fraud:

Larry Summers: If you look at the economy at the beginning of this year, prevailing forecasts were that Covid would reduce wages and salaries to American households by $20bn-$30bn a month, with that figure declining over the year.

So, that would be a $250bn-$300bn hole in wages and salaries over the course of the year. So, I look at this hole and then I see $900bn of stimulus in the December package, $1.9tn of stimulus in the recently passed package and $2tn in the savings overhang, which is also likely to be spent.

I see the Fed with its foot on the accelerator as hard as any Fed has ever done.

I see serious discussion of trillions of dollars more in fiscal stimulus, along with the explanation that this latest package is not temporary Covid relief, but a harbinger of a major transformation in social policy, which suggests that at least some of it will be continued indefinitely.

So, I look at that dwindling hole. Then I look at expenditures that aren’t hard to add into the multiple trillions, and I see substantial risk that the amount of water being poured in vastly exceeds the size of the bathtub.

That could manifest itself, as a much smaller period of excess did during the Vietnam war, in rising inflation and a ratcheting-up of inflation expectations. It could, as has often happened, manifest itself in the Federal Reserve feeling a need for a sharp and surprising increase in interest rates, and the subsequent deceleration of the economy into recession. It could manifest itself in a period of euphoric boom and optimism that leads to unsustainable bubbles, or it could all work out well.

But, it doesn’t seem to me that the preponderant probability is that it will work out well. So I’m concerned that what is being done is substantially excessive.

Martin Wolf: Joe Biden’s $1.9tn package is a risky experiment.

Larry Summers: Now, when we’re talking about fiscal stimulus totalling 14 per cent of GDP in its first round, when we’re also talking about extraordinary monetary measures, structural effects of Covid — notably a large savings overhang — it seems to me that we are way overdoing the requisite response. I always thought of economics as a quantitative field and when I hear people talk about why this is the right thing to do, they say things like “we really need to go big”, or “the 2009 stimulus was too small”.

It seems to me one needs to link the scale of the problem with the magnitude of the response. I look at the response and I look at the scale of the problem and I can’t see how it adds up. There’s not much argument that the 2009 stimulus, in retrospect, was too small. It was 4 to 5 per cent of GDP over a couple of years, so it was 2.5 per cent of GDP in the first year, against a gap that was 6 or 7 per cent of GDP and growing, so it was perhaps a third or half of that gap.

Today’s stimulus is above 10 per cent of GDP in the face of a gap that is 3 or 4 per cent of GDP. Relative to the gap, this stimulus is already of the order of five or six times as large as in 2009. Not even the most extravagant critics of the 2009 stimulus have suggested it should have been six times as large.

I would say one other thing. In...the 2009 stimulus, there were important investments in electronic medical records, new green venture capital and research-type measures, extending broadband and infrastructure repair and investment.

What’s striking about today is that all of the trillions of dollars — all of it — does not include a penny directed at building back better. I could have been comfortable with a headline figure well in excess of $1.9tn if it had been a large-scale, multiyear programme of public investment responding to our deepest societal concerns.

But that’s not what this is. It transfers to state and local governments that don’t have any new budget problem, according to the latest figures. It’s paying people, who have been unemployed, more in unemployment insurance than they earned when they were working. It’s giving cheques to families in the 90th percentile of income distribution. It doesn’t seem prudent on resource allocation grounds, as well as being problematic on macroeconomic grounds

Posted by Ulatle Hupusosh5529 2021-05-03 10:01|| 2021-05-03 10:01|| Front Page Top

#5 first quarter CPI figures due May 11 or 12

Posted by Lord Garth 2021-05-03 10:38|| 2021-05-03 10:38|| Front Page Top

#6 As far as I can see the administration's policy is "We're going to print as much money as we want and give the money to whoever we want."
The "infrastructure plan" is a giant slush fund.

Posted by Matt 2021-05-03 11:42|| 2021-05-03 11:42|| Front Page Top

#7 The Dems' top economist just admitted that this $6 trillion in spend is a humunguous slush fund. Biggest fraud of the century.

Posted by Percy Stalin3731 2021-05-03 12:01|| 2021-05-03 12:01|| Front Page Top

#8 Actually Charley they're going to have a hard time doing what you did in order to get rich.

Posted by Cesare 2021-05-03 12:09|| 2021-05-03 12:09|| Front Page Top

#9 The underlying premise for all this criticism is that the real administration over at the Kalorama Kompound wants this insanity to help America. Consider what you might do if your real motive was to hyper-inflate America in to devastating and permanent disintegration. Then the blather as the "justifications" for these policies can be seen for what it is, misinformation to delay corrective action for as long as possible.

Posted by NoMoreBS 2021-05-03 13:03|| 2021-05-03 13:03|| Front Page Top

#10 Remember that the real global adversary today is China, and they view the USA as the main obstacle to global dominance. SO why wouldn't they use every tool in the toolbox to defeat a superpower adversary with guile and willing domestic allies who control the policy means of destruction economically and socially? The just witnessed the devastation wrought by the accidental release in Wuhan and their subsequent purposeful enhancements to the global pandemic. Economic devastation is as lethal as a nuke strike with far less blowback, particularly if you can fool the enemy into thinks its his own domestic troubles of racism and inequality...

Posted by NoMoreBS 2021-05-03 13:14|| 2021-05-03 13:14|| Front Page Top

#11 What the idiots don't get is the dollar is the only thing holding this place together. They didn't learn from last year how quickly stuff can shut down and disappear. Their main base of support will be SOL.

Posted by Procopius2k 2021-05-03 13:27|| 2021-05-03 13:27|| Front Page Top

#12 Commodity prices are soaring. Lumber, corn, copper - you name it. Gold is rallying again.

Posted by Zebulon McGurque7633 2021-05-03 14:14|| 2021-05-03 14:14|| Front Page Top

#13 Like the silicon valley story, these idiots funded Biden and voted for him. It's sad we all have to pay for the mistakes these idiots made.

Posted by rjschwarz 2021-05-03 20:37|| 2021-05-03 20:37|| Front Page Top

22:40 Xyz
21:17 SteveS
20:37 rjschwarz
20:34 rjschwarz
19:59 KBK
19:57 Clem
19:56 Clem
19:51 Clem
19:03 jpal
18:51 CrazyFool
18:00 CrazyFool
17:52 CrazyFool
17:27 Sheba Hatfield6435
17:14 49 Pan
17:12 49 Pan
17:04 magpie
17:02 Cesare
16:58 Thraising Flomoting3580
16:52 Jereck Grolurong1710
16:52 magpie
16:48 Thing From Snowy Mountain
16:44 Blackbeard Barnsmell6454
16:39 swksvolFF
16:39 Sheba Wittlesbach6453