Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 03/01/2004 View Sun 02/29/2004 View Sat 02/28/2004 View Fri 02/27/2004 View Thu 02/26/2004 View Wed 02/25/2004 View Tue 02/24/2004
1
2004-03-01 
Binny in Fata?
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Dan Darling 2004-03-01 12:32:47 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 i got a better idea--how about severing his windpipe--along with his pukhtun and arab protectors--how do you like them adam's apples!!
Posted by SON OF TOLUI 2004-3-1 12:38:25 AM||   2004-3-1 12:38:25 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Now that was an interesting quote by the pentagon spokeswoman... assuming it is really what she said. I'd like to see this from a US news source before I believe those were the words used...
Posted by Damn_Proud_American  2004-3-1 12:40:02 AM|| [http://brighterfuture.blogspot.com]  2004-3-1 12:40:02 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Osama Bin Laden crossed into Pakistan on Feb 27 and is closely guarded by Al Qaeda and Taliban fighters disguised as a Pakistani tribesman, US media reported on Sunday.

I'd just like to thank the media, who told Binny we're on to what he's doing.
Posted by Charles  2004-3-1 7:20:09 AM||   2004-3-1 7:20:09 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 
Instead of a direct assault, Pakistan has urged the Americans to isolate Bin Laden
What a chicken-shit country.
Posted by Mike Sylwester  2004-3-1 7:33:45 AM||   2004-3-1 7:33:45 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 Pakistan is particularly concerned that any offensive that leads to a large number of Pukhtun deaths could have very negative political consequences for the government in Islamabad hmmm.. right they may try to assinate the head of the country or something.
Posted by domingo 2004-3-1 8:28:57 AM||   2004-3-1 8:28:57 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 Somebody redraw the maps. If Pakistan is too chicken-sh*t to send its troops into the western part of the country, then guess what? It ain't part of your country.
Posted by BH  2004-3-1 10:34:10 AM||   2004-3-1 10:34:10 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 BH - in the '50s there was a "pashtunistan" movement to annex the Pashtun areas of Pakistan to Afghanistan. US opposed it, since at the time Afghanistan was friendly to the Soviets, and Pakistan was firmly pro-Western.

Probably wouldnt be a good idea today. Too many Pashtuns in Afghanistan would make Afghanistan impossible to stabilize. Better leave them in Pakistan, and work around as well as we can.
Posted by liberalhawk 2004-3-1 10:46:21 AM||   2004-3-1 10:46:21 AM|| Front Page Top

09:59 Evert Visser
09:31 Raptor
06:48 Shipman
00:13 SON OF TOLUI
00:02 SON OF TOLUI
23:58 SON OF TOLUI
23:51 SON OF TOLUI
23:42 Anonymous2U
23:14 Traveller
23:00 Mr. Davis
22:59 Super Hose
22:57 mrp
22:50 Raj
22:50 Super Hose
22:46 Super Hose
22:38 Super Hose
22:36 Noel
22:35 Super Hose
22:28 Noel
22:16 whitecollar redneck
22:15 GK
22:13 Laurence of the Rats
22:13 whitecollar redneck
22:13 Damn_Proud_American









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com