Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 10/17/2004 View Sat 10/16/2004 View Fri 10/15/2004 View Thu 10/14/2004 View Wed 10/13/2004 View Tue 10/12/2004 View Mon 10/11/2004
1
2004-10-17 International-UN-NGOs
Annan: Iraq War Done Little to Halt Terrorism
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Destro 2004-10-17 8:22:01 AM|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Annan:"We have a lot of work to do as an international community to try and make the world safer."
You could start by doing something other than talking about the genocide in the Dafur province of Sudan, Kofi. Maybe you could use some of the money you and your son skimmed off the Iraqi oil for food program.
Posted by GK 2004-10-17 10:20:16 AM||   2004-10-17 10:20:16 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 "The Iraq war has done little to increase security across the world or halt the activities of international terrorists, United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan said Sunday."

Pardon me for posing what might be construed as an awkward-- or even insensitive-- question, but WHAT THE HELL HAS THE U.N. EVER DONE ABOUT TERRORISM????????

"He said if Washington were to decide to go for military action against Iran, it would probably be illegal under the U.N. charter. "I think that would be the view of the members of the council," he said."

In that case, bye-bye U.N.

And good riddance.
Posted by Dave D. 2004-10-17 10:37:32 AM||   2004-10-17 10:37:32 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 At this point, I think it could be fairly said that the War on Terrorism, *more* than stopping terrorism, has stopped at least half a dozen WARS, with one or more of them being nuclear.
Posted by Anonymoose 2004-10-17 10:41:23 AM||   2004-10-17 10:41:23 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 
Re #1 (GK)): Maybe you could use some of the money you and your son skimmed off the Iraqi oil for food program.

Please explain how much money they skimmed off and how they did it. I can find no evidence at all for either of these allegations.

I already know that Kojo Annan worked for Cotecna 13 months before Cotecna won the UN contract for submitting the lowest bid. And I know that Kojo Annan worked for a consulting company that provided consulting services for Cotecna.

But what is your evidence that the two Annans skimmed money off the food-for-oil program? And can you say approximately how much money they skimmed?

Thank you in advance for your evidence.
.
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-10-17 10:50:13 AM||   2004-10-17 10:50:13 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 not surprised that you wrote that, Mike S. - useful defender of the UN. Kojo's name has already been implicated in Iraqi docs. Think Dad didn't know or share in the ill-gotten wealth?
Posted by Frank G  2004-10-17 11:15:20 AM||   2004-10-17 11:15:20 AM|| Front Page Top

#6  "We have a lot of work to do as an international community to try and make the world safer."

Packing your sh*t up so it can be moved to Paris will be hard work, Kori.
Posted by badanov  2004-10-17 11:17:57 AM|| [http://www.rkka.org/title-boris.gif]  2004-10-17 11:17:57 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 The Iraqi war has done quite a bit to halt terrorists......we killed about a hundred of them there last week, and about a hundred a week before that, and so forth....do the math Kofi. The more we pull these assholes into Iraq the less they do in other countries while we slowly suffocate their financial backings, pretty simple process, I'm not surprised he doesn't get it.
Posted by Jarhead 2004-10-17 11:27:52 AM||   2004-10-17 11:27:52 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 
Re: (Frank G): Kojo's name has already been implicated in Iraqi docs.

Thanks for the heads-up about the evidence, Frank G. Please provide a link and explain briefly how it implicates Kofi (or even Kojo) Annan.

Thanks in advance for your evidence!!
.
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-10-17 11:59:06 AM||   2004-10-17 11:59:06 AM|| Front Page Top

#9 "It’s inconceivable. These are very serious and important governments. You are not dealing with banana republics."

You know, like... Ghana?
Or the UN?
Posted by tu3031 2004-10-17 12:01:11 PM||   2004-10-17 12:01:11 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 Gee, Mike, didn't you once tell me to do my own research when I asked you just for a link to something you claimed?

Wouldn't want to be a hypocrite, now would we?
Posted by .com 2004-10-17 12:13:33 PM||   2004-10-17 12:13:33 PM|| Front Page Top

#11 how about Saybolt getting a Oil-for-dictator's-whores contract after they hired Kojo? How qualified was he for that, Mikey? That took 1 google hit
Posted by Frank G  2004-10-17 12:18:29 PM||   2004-10-17 12:18:29 PM|| Front Page Top

#12 WHAT THE HELL HAS THE U.N. EVER DONE ABOUT TERRORISM

Encouraged it, of course. Giving the PLO observer status as if they were a proto-government instead of a terrorist organization ejected from two countries; voting to sanction the only nation that prior to 9/11 was actively engaged in fighting terrorists; voting to put terror-sponsoring nations on human rights issue committees; appointing inspectors who are constitutionally incapable of effectively inpecting (IAEA and Iraq weapons inspectors); putting on the ground Blue Helmet troops who are inadequate for the task of protecting an embattled populace, and not permitted to interfere in any case; and this latest, Kofi Annan insisting that the bribees don't even have the honor to remain bribed.

Kofi Annan is a diplomat, not a lawyer. He is not qualified to comment on the [il]legality of an invasion of Iran -- that is a matter between two States in an undeclared state of war since Ayatollah Khomeini started playing his little games.

I'm sure Mr. Annan is correct though, that the UNSC would take a negative view of invading Iran. I think Secretary Powell should make a presentation explaining our actions, but not submit it to a vote.
Posted by trailing wife 2004-10-17 12:46:19 PM||   2004-10-17 12:46:19 PM|| Front Page Top

#13 Has Kofi & his son hidden all of those Saddam Oil-for-Food 'profits'..yet?
Posted by Mark Espinola 2004-10-17 1:04:06 PM||   2004-10-17 1:04:06 PM|| Front Page Top

#14 
The Iraq war has done little to increase security across the world or halt the activities of international terrorists, United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan said
That might be because the leftist tranzi wankers UN and Annan have been so busy supporting and even encouraging the activities of international terrorists.

Explain to me why anyone with even an ounce of common sense thinks it's a good idea to give any kind of legitimized voice to dictators and thugs.

Fuck the UN. And the limousines they rode in on.
Posted by Barbara Skolaut  2004-10-17 1:10:23 PM||   2004-10-17 1:10:23 PM|| Front Page Top

#15 ...You know, I'm starting to get a sneaking suspicion that our buddies in the UN might be trying to set us up for a showdown they think they're going to win. First, I believe they believe that despite the best efforts of the Left, GWB will be re-elected, so they're laying the groundwork now for a try at stopping the Iran action that will almost certainly come soon afterwards. Second, I think you are going to see a STRONG attempt at a Muslim Secretary General when Annan leaves. That will almost certainly set off the final showdown - but the kleptocracies that unfortunately make up the bulk of UN membership will be betting we'll cave, and even if we don't, they can still beat us. The real problem there is that President Kerry would be on his knees in NYC within 30 seconds to kiss the new SG's ring.

Mike
Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2004-10-17 1:36:21 PM||   2004-10-17 1:36:21 PM|| Front Page Top

#16 You have many nations in the UN that support or allow terrorists to use their territory for their activities. Then you ask the same UN to help fight terrorism. Ask the fox to take care of the chicken coop. It is insane.

The first step to a solution to the problem is to get a Jean Kirkpatrick type of person to rub their noses in it and hold up a mirror.

The next step is to start drying up the funding that is enabling this behavior. That will do more to solve the problem than anything.
Posted by Alaska Paul 2004-10-17 1:42:20 PM||   2004-10-17 1:42:20 PM|| Front Page Top

#17 At least we all have sufficient common sense not to wonder why Annan's eyes are brown.

"I cannot not say the world is safer when you consider the violence around us, when you look around you and see the terrorist attacks around the world and you see what is going on in Iraq ..."

One simple equation: Compare the fatalities in Darfur with those involved in the entire global war on terror.

End of story, period.

What's the ratio: 5:1? 10:1?

Anna's impotent meddling and dithering has killed far more people than America's world-wide efforts to halt Islam's psychotic murdering thugs. Regardless of how Annan meets his end, I can only hope it is extremely slow and exceptionally painful. He is a silk-shirted killer making a pretense of diplomacy while he knowingly condemns thousands to their grueling deaths. May he rot in Hell.
Posted by Zenster 2004-10-17 2:19:46 PM||   2004-10-17 2:19:46 PM|| Front Page Top

#18 
Re: (#11, Frank G) how about "Saybolt getting a Oil-for-dictator's-whores contract after they hired Kojo?" How qualified was he for that, Mikey?

The article is titled, "UN inspector 'took £60,000 Iraq bribes". The article does not name the UN inspector, but says he was contracted through a Dutch company called Saybolt. The article doesn't indicate that Kojo Annan had any relationship at all to Saybolt.

The article says another company, a Swiss company called Cotecna, employed Kojo Annan as a consultant. The article says the UN looked into that relationship and found no conflict of interest.

The article says Saybolt and Cotecna deny any wrongdoing. The article provides no evidence that Saybolt and Cotecna did anything wrong, except that one person contracted by Saybolt is accused of taking bribes.

That's your evidence? I'm, well, kind of disappointed. I kind of expected something more substantial.

Oh, well. I supposed there's some evidence out there somewhere. Thank you in advance to whoever points it out.
.
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-10-17 2:33:12 PM||   2004-10-17 2:33:12 PM|| Front Page Top

#19 1st google hit and I find a contract for Kofi's son = contract for the oil program for the hiring company. If you believe the UN's word, then do your own research....try UN.org, they'll say I'm wrong, of course
Posted by Frank G  2004-10-17 2:42:24 PM||   2004-10-17 2:42:24 PM|| Front Page Top

#20 
There is no evidence that Kojo Annan's employment or consulting for Cotecna had anything at all to do with the food-for-oil program. None. That applies to your article too, Frank G.

The only reason that I mentioned the UN's review of the matter was that there was so little about Kojo Annan in the article, just a couple of sentences, that I pointed out that sentence too.

Well, everyone is so sure that the Annans skimmed money from the oil-for-food program, that I'm sure there's some good evidence out there. Where there's smoke, there's fire.

Thanks in advance to whoever points out the evidence. I'll be looking for it. I'm very sure it'll be really good evidence, since everybody knows these accusations are well founded and true.
.
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-10-17 2:50:14 PM||   2004-10-17 2:50:14 PM|| Front Page Top

#21 
OK, let's summarize the evidence that Kojo Annan skimmed money off the oil-for-food program:

1. Kojo Annan worked on the staff of Cotecna. He left Cotecna 13 months before Cotecna won a UN contract to monitor the food-for-oil program. Cotecna won the contract by submitting the lowest bid.

2. Kojo Annan subsequently worked for a consulting firm that did some consulting work for Cotecna.

That's a good start! Let's all work together to gather some more evidence!! Ladies and gentlemen, start your Google engines!!!

We'll meet back here to compare our findings through the rest of the day, on the hour. So, our next meeting here will be at 4 p.m. EST. See you then!!
.
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-10-17 3:20:11 PM||   2004-10-17 3:20:11 PM|| Front Page Top

#22 I'll wait for Volker's report. If Kofi didn't get $, then he's just an anti-American no-morals/ethics POS, not a corrupt one. Not surprisingly, you're in his corner, Mikey
Posted by Frank G  2004-10-17 3:29:20 PM||   2004-10-17 3:29:20 PM|| Front Page Top

#23 
OK. It's 4 p.m. I didn't find anything yet, but I'm still looking. Anybody have any progress to report?

GK, I'm especially counting on you, buddy. I know you've got some evidence somewhere up your sleeve. Don't tease us by making us wait all day.
.
Posted by Clavith Ebbereling2475 2004-10-17 4:01:12 PM||   2004-10-17 4:01:12 PM|| Front Page Top

#24 As I see it, with all the Oil For Food bribe money floating around either

a) Kofi &/or Son were too ethical to take any, but not ethical enough to stop it;
b) criminally oblivious
c) on the take, but the paperwork hasn't been found yet

Remember Mike: (absence of evidence) != (evidence of absence) The various investigations are early days, yet. Mr. Annan was revealed to have reminded all contractors of the no-revelation clause, which is one reason why Volker's in-house investigation is going so slowly. On the other side, there are truckloads of Iraqi papers to be translated from Arabic before they can be analyzed. Although, what's been revealed so far appears pretty damning to me. Certainly, the French are up in arms about it!
Posted by trailing wife 2004-10-17 4:04:14 PM||   2004-10-17 4:04:14 PM|| Front Page Top

#25 
#23 was posted by me, Mike Sylwester. I kind of like the ring of Clavith Ebbereling, though.
.
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-10-17 4:08:27 PM||   2004-10-17 4:08:27 PM|| Front Page Top

#26 
Re #24 (Trailing Wife): Kofi &/or Son were .... criminally oblivious

Thanks for your input, Trailing Wife. I'm intrigues by your suggestion that Kojo Annan was "criminally oblivious." Does this mean that you have some evidence that Kojo Annan's employment or consulting had anything at all to do with the food-for-oil program?

Give us a hint about where your research today is leading you. Was Kojo criminally oblivious while he was employed at Cotecna 13 months before Cotecna got the contract, or was he criminally oblivious while he was working for a consulting firm that did some consulting work for Cotecna?
.
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-10-17 4:13:42 PM||   2004-10-17 4:13:42 PM|| Front Page Top

#27 
Re #24 (Trailing Wife): Kofi &/or Son were .... criminally oblivious

I want to stay focused on our research topic today, Trailing Wife, but let me ask an unrelated question:

Would you say that George W. Bush and Donald Rumsfield were "criminally oblivious" about the mistreatment of prisoners in Abu Ghraib prison?
.
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-10-17 4:19:20 PM||   2004-10-17 4:19:20 PM|| Front Page Top

#28 Mikey - if your beloved UN (were you high school pres. of the model UN club?) is innocent, why the "no discussions with news orgs" prohibition?
Posted by Frank G  2004-10-17 4:21:14 PM||   2004-10-17 4:21:14 PM|| Front Page Top

#29 
Re #28 (Frank G): why the "no discussions with news orgs" prohibition?

You might be onto something there, Frank G. I'm gonna go look for some evidence that this prohibition originated with and is unique to the food-for-oil program.

See you all at 5 p.m. EST !!
.

Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-10-17 4:24:12 PM||   2004-10-17 4:24:12 PM|| Front Page Top

#30 if the Kofi and the UN are so innocent then answer why there spending 17million dollers (i think) announced the other day to look into this huge global SCAM!
Posted by Shep UK 2004-10-17 4:24:31 PM||   2004-10-17 4:24:31 PM|| Front Page Top

#31 Mike, Bush and Rumsfeld didn't need to be criminally oblivious to the Abu Ghraib situation. The misbehaviour only lasted a few days before the actors were turned in by a comrade, and the Court Martial system immediately investigated and punished the perpetrators. In the case of Oil For Food, Kofi Annan is still denying any wrongdoing took place, and still stonewalling both internal and external investigations. Why are you defending Koji Annan anyway? Is he a personal friend or something? I don't have any new evidence for you -- I've got home stuff that needs to be taken care of.
Posted by trailing wife 2004-10-17 4:29:13 PM||   2004-10-17 4:29:13 PM|| Front Page Top

#32 Mike, I agree. If Kerry wins then there certainly will be a muslim Secretary General -- and Kerry will be right there with his pants to his knees bending over. "A reach around is not necessary..".

The U.N. has outlived its usefulness and its time that we replace that den of theves with something better. Let the kleptomanics have it - they can steal from each other - dont give the UN another dime.
Posted by CrazyFool  2004-10-17 4:40:07 PM||   2004-10-17 4:40:07 PM|| Front Page Top

#33 CF - you don't agree with Mike
Posted by Frank G  2004-10-17 4:44:10 PM||   2004-10-17 4:44:10 PM|| Front Page Top

#34 But it has done lots to halt flux of money into Annan's pockets.
Posted by JFM  2004-10-17 4:49:23 PM||   2004-10-17 4:49:23 PM|| Front Page Top

#35 
Re #31 (Trailing Wife) In the case of Oil For Food, Kofi Annan is still denying any wrongdoing took place, and still stonewalling both internal and external investigations.

You might be onto something, Trailing Wife. Do you have a link to a statement by Kofi Annan denying that any wrongdoing took place?

Also, a link to an article with evidence that he is stonewalling internal and external investigations?

It looks to me like you're well informed about this, with the info at your fingertips. I expect to see these links by the 5 pm meeting.
.
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-10-17 4:50:03 PM||   2004-10-17 4:50:03 PM|| Front Page Top

#36 
Re #28 (Frank G): why the "no discussions with news orgs" prohibition?

Frank G, I pursued this lead you suggested, but I haven't come up with any evidence that Kofi Annan declared this policy as new or unique for the food-for-oil program. It seems to be an old, standard policy that applies to all investigations.

(Also, it seems that Donald Rumsfield had a similar policy in effect for the investigation about Abu Ghraib. Kind of disturbing, but I suppose that is another issue.)

Trailing Wife, do you have those links about Kofi Annan 1) denying wrongdoing and 2) stonewalling? Do you need some help finding them? Can anyone help out Trailing Wife with this?

See you all again at 6 p.m. EST.
.

Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-10-17 5:04:30 PM||   2004-10-17 5:04:30 PM|| Front Page Top

#37 I don't think so, UN-Boy. Do your own research, if Kofi will let you without a subpoena by congress (that's what it takes, now)
Posted by Frank G  2004-10-17 5:12:33 PM||   2004-10-17 5:12:33 PM|| Front Page Top

#38 
Hey, where was everybody at 6 pm?! I assume you all were busy collecting evidence. I'm anticipating some good evidence at our 7 pm meeting!!
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-10-17 6:14:34 PM||   2004-10-17 6:14:34 PM|| Front Page Top

#39 Frank, your right I dont...
Posted by CrazyFool  2004-10-17 6:21:52 PM||   2004-10-17 6:21:52 PM|| Front Page Top

#40  "Cash this check ONLY in my Swiss back, okay Kofi?"

"Okay, mum's the word."
Posted by Mark Espinola 2004-10-17 6:52:13 PM||   2004-10-17 6:52:13 PM|| Front Page Top

#41 Mike S.
1. Kojo Annan worked on the staff of Cotecna. He left Cotecna 13 months before Cotecna won a UN contract to monitor the food-for-oil program. Cotecna won the contract by submitting the lowest bid.

Just skimmed the comments, so I may be repeating what someone already wrote. The problem is that Kojo went back to consult with Cotecna a few months before the contract was awarded. But that was also the time when contract bids were being put together. That is the critical time when inside UN info on competitors will do the most damage. Then he left just before the contact award was announced, but the results were already known within the UN.

This would be like Rumsfeld's son going to consult with Lockheed while they are putting together the final bids on the JSF.
Posted by ed 2004-10-17 6:55:28 PM||   2004-10-17 6:55:28 PM|| Front Page Top

#42 
Thanks, Ed. I'd appreciate a link, when you have time to find one. I'd like to look at the details.
.
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-10-17 7:02:25 PM||   2004-10-17 7:02:25 PM|| Front Page Top

#43 Mike Sylwester:

I'm late to the party for this thread, but in a nutshell, do you seriously believe that the UN has any redeeming qualities?
Posted by Crusader 2004-10-17 7:04:31 PM||   2004-10-17 7:04:31 PM|| Front Page Top

#44 I will look it up. I think it was a Laurie Mylorie(sp?) article. I included the link in a similar comment a few days ago.
Posted by ed 2004-10-17 7:05:57 PM||   2004-10-17 7:05:57 PM|| Front Page Top

#45 
I'm looking for details about what Kojo Annan did at the consulting firm and about what the consulting firm had to do with the food-for-oil program. I read somewhere that Kojo Annan was involved in consulting about some project in Subsaharan Africa that had nothing at all to do with the food-for-oil program.
.
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-10-17 7:06:12 PM||   2004-10-17 7:06:12 PM|| Front Page Top

#46 Title should read:
Annan Done Little to Halt Terrorism.
Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom  2004-10-17 7:08:08 PM|| [http://www.slhess.com]  2004-10-17 7:08:08 PM|| Front Page Top

#47 It was Claudia Rosett. Here is one link.
Turtle Bay’s Carnival of Corruption
According to Annan's spokesman, Kojo held a staff job at Cotecna in a junior position from December 1995 through February 1998. Just two months later, Kojo reappeared on Cotecna's payroll as a consultant, via a firm called Sutton Investments, from April 1998 to December 1998, resigning from that consultancy just before Cotecna clinched the U.N. contract on December 31, 1998.

In addition, I like this punch line:
Ultimately, the big questions here are not just who profited from graft under Oil-for-Food, but the extent to which the U.N. setup of secrecy, warped incentives, and lack of accountability allowed it to supervise the transformation of Oil-for-Food into a program of theft-from-Iraqis, cash-for-Saddam, and grease-for-the-U.N.
Posted by ed 2004-10-17 7:12:40 PM||   2004-10-17 7:12:40 PM|| Front Page Top

#48 
Re #43 (Crusader) do you seriously believe that the UN has any redeeming qualities?

Sure. Do you really believe it has none?
.
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-10-17 7:13:04 PM||   2004-10-17 7:13:04 PM|| Front Page Top

#49 Mike Sylwester..
Start here with this search of translations of the Oil For Food documents on Memri.


MEMRI Search: Vouchers


This was the first tranlation published on Jan 29



The Beneficiaries of Saddam's Oil Vouchers: The List of 270

The following report from MEMRI's Baghdad office is a translation of an article which appeared in the Iraqi daily Al-Mada, [1] whichobtained lists of 270 companies, organizations, and individuals awarded allocations (vouchers) of crude oil by Saddam Hussein's regime. The beneficiaries reside in 50 countries: 16 Arab, 17 European, 9 Asian, and the rest from sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America.Only a portion of the 270 recipients are listed and identified.

Background

The following points should be taken into consideration:

First, MEMRI is not responsible for the accuracy of the details with regard to the names listed or the amount of oil granted.

Second, all names listed in the original were in Arabic. Some of those are transliterated into English phonetically, and may not be precise.

Third, denials by those whose names appear in this dispatch are footnoted.

Fourth, the issuing of vouchers by Saddam's regime may have served two primary purposes:

A: Payments in the form of bribes to individuals and organizations for their support of the regime.

B: Vouchers may have been issued to pay for goods and services that fell under U.N. Security Council sanctions and could not be financed under the "Oil for Food" program. Goods may have included military equipment or military parts, luxury automobiles that Saddam distributed as gifts inside and outside Iraq, and general luxury goods for the benefit of high-ranking officials in the Ba'ath party and government.

Fifth, the voucher recipients sold the vouchers to oil traders, who then collected the oil against the vouchers from the Kirkuk-Banias (Syria) pipeline terminal, which was operating in contravention of the Security Council sanctions. The pipeline carried 200,000 barrels per day of Iraqi oil, which benefited Syria greatly.


Al-Mada's Article

The following are excerpts from the article:

"Under this professional and electrifying title, there are names that have nothing to do with oil companies, or the distribution, storage, and marketing of oil. They are not known for having any interest in oil or any links to oil companies, such as the Russian Orthodox Church and the Russian Communist Party.

"As far as the individuals, the situation is even more puzzling. We can understand that the journalist Hameeda Na'Na',who defended the former regime, was trying to perpetuate her independent journalistic endeavor through an oil deal, but it is strange to find the names of Khaled,son of the late Gamal Abd Al-Nasser,in those lists, or Toujan Al-Faisal, former member of the Jordanian parliament, or the present Indonesian president, or the son of the Syrian defense minister, or the son of the Lebanese president."

Saddam's Exploitation of U.N. Sanctions

"Since the deposed regime endorsed the 'Memorandum of Understanding,' also known as 'oil for food [program],' it turned it into a despicable political and commercial game, and used it to finance its clandestine acquisitions of arms, expensive construction materials for the presidential palaces and mosques, and frivolous luxury items. It turned the oil sales agreements into the greatest bribery operation in history, buying souls and pens, and squandering the nation's resources.

"Since then, rumors were abound about vouchers that Saddam gave to certain Arab and foreign dignitaries, providing them with crude oil in exchange for their support to the regime in a period of international isolation, and as a way to finance the campaign to lift the economic sanctions against it and to whitewash its image.

"However, the regime itself tarnished the moral and humane ethics of the international campaign to lift the unjust sanctions, because by the end of the day the sanctions did not harm it [the regime], but harmed our poor people and the middle class. We saw that whenever the international campaign to lift the sanctions got closer to its goals, the regime – by its behavior and insolence – shoved it again into a dark tunnel, and at the same time turned our country into a free-for-all richly loaded dining table, awaiting a stream of hearty eaters and obedient servants.

"One of the traits of our country's fascist regime is that it lacked decency and was always in need to use others in order to feel superior. Therefore, it corrupted even those who had good intentions and noble goals when defending the Iraqi people and trying to lift the siege imposed on it. The regime was versed only in the politics of the 'open wallet,' and therefore surrounded itself with people that it could co-opt and people who would panhandle for it, so that it could feel moral superiority over them.

"And if one happened to know some of the official Ba'athists, who did not hesitate - because of their rural values - to boast and to [assume] moral superiority, one would have heard a lot from them about the ever-increasing number of visitors to Iraq in recent years, and would have understood from them that those visitors who came to defend us also came to cash in the price for that. We can confirm this information because the Ba'athists themselves, in a moment of 'rural pompousness,' propagated the rumors about the Arab and foreign visitors. They mentioned some of the names listed here, among them George Galloway, member of the [British] Labor party.

"The case of Mr. Galloway is truly distressing. This man, who defended just Arab causes, became a loser as he got closer to the Iraqi regime. Galloway, who was banished from the party for this reason and who defended himself vehemently, and even attacked Tony Blair's and Bush's policies, will not be able - in my opinion - to refute Iraqi documents that incriminate him conclusively.

"In addition to the lists mentioned above, Al-Mada also obtained six requests from the executive director and the associate executive director of the Oil Marketing Company to the Oil Minister 'to approve the crude oil agreements.' All of them mentioned the name of Mr. Galloway, not as a party in the agreement, but as a recipient, since Mr. Galloway hides behind a company that does not carry his name nor his nationality.

"The manner by which these agreements were struck sheds light on the process of awarding the vouchers and the goodwill of the President of the Republic [Saddam]. That is why we wish to decipher it, especially since the lists include some individual names such as 'Samir,' and no one knows whether it belongs to an individual or to a company."

The List

The following is a partial list and description of individuals and organizations that MEMRI has been able to identify: [2]

Canada: Arthur Millholland, president and CEO of the Calgary-based Oilexco company, received 1 million barrels of oil.

United States: Samir Vincent received 10.5 million barrels. In 2000, Vincent, an Iraqi-born American citizen who has lived in the U.S. since 1958, organized a delegation of Iraqi religious leaders to visit the U.S. and meet with former president Jimmy Carter. Shaker Al-Khafaji,the pro-Saddam chairman of the 17th conference of Iraqi expatriates, received 1 million barrels.

Great Britain: George Galloway received 1 million barrels. Fawwaz Zreiqat received 1 million barrels. Zreiqat also appears in the Jordanian section as having received 6 million barrels. The Mujahideen Khalq [3] in Britain received 1 million barrels.

France: The French-Arab Friendship Association received 15.1 million barrels. Former French Interior Minister Charles Pasqua received 12 million barrels. [4] Patrick Maugein of the Trafigura company received 25 million barrels. Michel Grimard, founder of the French-Iraqi Export Club, received 17.1 million barrels.

Switzerland: Glenco Re, the largest commodity trader in Switzerland, received 12 million barrels. Taurus, which has been associated with Iraq for 20 years and was the first company to renew its business with Iraq after the fall of Saddam, received 1 million barrels. Petrogas, which is listed under three sub-companies – Petrogas Services, Petrogas Distribution, and Petrogas Resources - and is associated withthe Russian company Rosneftegazetroy, received 1 million barrels. Alcon, listed in Lichtenstein and associated with larger oil companies, received 1 million barrels. Finar Holdings, which is listed in Lugano, Switzerland, and is under liquidation, received 1 million barrels.

Italy: The Italian Petrol Union received 1 million barrels.West Petrol, an Italian company that trades crude oil and oil products, received 1 million barrels. Roberto Formigoni, possibly the president of Lombardia, received 1 million barrels. Salvatore Nicotra, a former NATO pilot who became an oil merchant, received 1 million barrels.

Spain: Basem Qaqish, a member of the Spanish Committee for the Defense of the Arab Cause, received 1 million barrels. Ali Ballout, a pro-Saddam Lebanese journalist, received 1 million barrels. Javier Robert received 1 million barrels.

Yugoslavia: Four Yugoslav political parties received vouchers: the Yugoslav Left party received 9.5 million barrels. The Socialist Party received 1 million barrels. The Italian Party received 1 million barrels. A nother party, whose name in exact transliteration is "kokstuntsha" – possibly Kostunica's party – received 1 million barrels.

Other political parties: The Romanian Labor Party received 5.5 million barrels. The Party of the Hungarian Interest received 4.7 million barrels. The Bulgarian Socialist Party received 1 2 million barrels. The Slovakian Communist Party received 1 million barrels.

Austria: The Arab-Austrian Society received 1 million barrels.

Brazil: The 8th of October Movement, a Brazilian Communist group, received 4.5 million barrels. Fuwad Sirhan received 10 million barrels.

Egypt: Khaled Gamal Abd Al-Nasser, son of the late Egyptian president, received 16.6 million barrels. 'Imad Al-Galda, a businessman and a member of the Egyptian parliament from President Mubarak's National Democratic Party, received 14 million barrels. Abd Al-Azim Mannaf, [5] editor of the Sout Al-Arab newspaper, received 6 million barrels. Muhammad Hilmi, editor of the Egyptian paper Sahwat Misr, [6] received an undisclosed number of barrels. The United Arab Company received 6 million barrels. The Nile and Euphrates Company received 3 million barrels. The Al-Multaqa Foundation for Press and Publication received 1 million barrels. [7]

Libya: Prime Minister Shukri Ghanem received 1 million barrels.

Sub-Saharan Africa: Chad's foreign minister received 1 million barrels. [8] Four South Africans are listed: Tokyo Saxville received 4 million barrels. Montega received 4 million barrels. Both are associated with the African National Party.

Palestinians: The Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) received 4 million barrels. The PLO Political Bureau received 5 million barrels. Abu Al-Abbas received 11.5 million barrels. Abdallah Al-Horani received 8 million barrels. The PFLP received 5 million barrels. Wafa Tawfiq Al-Sayegh received 4 million barrels.

Oman: The Al-Shanfari group received 5 million barrels.

Syria: Farras Mustafa Tlass, the son of Syrian Defense Minister Mustafa Tlass, received 6 million barrels. 'Audh Amourah received18 million barrels. Ghassan Zakariya received 6 million barrels. Anwar Al-Aqqad received 2 million barrels. Hamida Na'Na', the owner of the Al-Wafaq Al-Arabi periodical, received 1 million barrels.

Lebanon: The son of Lebanese President Emil Lahoud received 4.5 million barrels. Former MP Najjah Wakim received 3 million barrels. Nasserist Party head Osama M'arouf received 3 million barrels. National Arabic Club Chairman Faisal Darnika received 3 million barrels.

Jordan: Former Islamist MP and head of the Engineers Union Leith Shbeilat [9] received 15.5 million barrels. Former MP and Jordanian Writers Union head Fakhri Qi'war received 6 million barrels. [10] Former Jordanian chief of staff Mashhour Haditha received 1 million barrels. Former MP Toujan Al-Faisal received 3 million barrels. [11] The Jordanian Ministry of Energy received 5 million barrels. Muhammad Saleh Al-Horani, the Amman Stock Exchange head and former Minister of Supplies, received 4 million barrels. Lawyer Wamidth Hussein Al-Majali received 6 million barrels. [12]

Qatar: Qatari Horseracing Association Chairman Hamad bin Ali Aal Thani received 14 million barrels. Gulf Petroleum received 2 million barrels.

The Indian Congress Party received 1 million barrels.

Indonesia: Indonesian President Megawati received 1 million barrels as "the daughter of President Sukarno," and 1 million barrels as Megawati.

Myanmar: Myanmar's Forestry Minister received 1 million barrels.

Ukraine: The Social Democratic Party received 1 million barrels. The Communist Party received 6 million barrels. The Socialist Party received 1 million barrels. The FTD oil company received 1 million barrels, as did other Ukrainian companies.

Belarus: The Liberal Party received 1 million barrels. The Communist Party received 1 ton [sic] of oil. The director of the Belarussian president's office received 1 million barrels.

Russia: The Russian state itself received 1,366,000,000 barrels. The list also included the following:

Companies belonging to the Liberal Democratic Party received 79.8 million barrels - t he list notes the name of party president Vladimir Zhirinovsky. The Russian Communist Party received 1 million barrels. The Lukoil company received 63 million barrels. The Russneft company received 35.5 million barrels. Vladimir Putin's Peace and Unity Party received 34 million barrels - the list notes the name of party chairwoman Saji Umalatova. The Gazprom company received 26 million barrels. The Soyuzneftgaz company received 25.5 million barrels - t he list notes the name Shafrannik. The Moscow Oil Company received 25.1 million barrels. The Onako company received 22.2 million barrels. The Sidanco company received 21.2 million barrels. The Russian Association for Solidarity with Iraq received 12.5 million barrels. The Ural Invest company received 8.5 million barrels. Russneft Gazexport received 12.5 million barrels. The Transneft company received 9 million barrels. The Sibneft company received 8.1 million barrels. The Stroyneftgaz company received 6 million barrels. The Russian Committee for Solidarity with the People of Iraq received 6.5 million barrels - the list notes the name of committee chairman Rudasev. The Russian Orthodox Church received 5 million barrels. The Moscow Science Academy received 3.5 million barrels. The Chechnya Administration received 2 million barrels. T he National Democratic Party received 2 million barrels. The Nordwest group received 2 million barrels. The Yukos company received 2 million barrels. One Russian company which phonetically reads as Zarabsneft received 174.5 million barrels. Vouchers were also granted to the Russian foreign ministry, one under the name of Al-Fayko for 1 million barrels, and one to Yetumin for 30.1 million barrels. T he Mashinoimport Company received 1 million barrels. The Slavneft Company received 1 million barrels. The Caspian Invest Company (Kalika) received 1 million barrels. The Tatneft Tatarstan company received 1 million barrels. The Surgutneft company received 1 million barrels. Siberia's oil and gas company received 1 million barrels.

In addition, the son of the former Russian Ambassador to Iraq received 19.7 million barrels. Nikolay Ryjkov, a former prime minister of the USSR, received 13 million barrels. The Russian President's office director received 5 million barrels.

Oil vouchers were also distributed to companies and individuals from the Sudan, Yemen, Cyprus, Turkey, Vietnam, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Pakistan, the UAE, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Panama, Thailand, Chad, China, Nigeria, Kenya, Ireland, Bahrain, and the Philippines. Two Saudi companies were also listed.

[1] Al-Mada (Baghdad), January 25, 2004. Al-Mada is an independent daily, published in Baghdad. Fakhri Karim is the Editor-in-Chief.

[2] More details about sources of organizations and individuals listed will appear in a forthcoming report.

[3] The Mujahideen Khalq is an organization which opposes the Iranian regime. The U.S. government has classified it as a terrorist group.

[4] Mr. Pasqua denied receiving anything from Saddam. Radio France Internationale (RFI), January 27, 2004.

[5] Mr. Manaf states that he has documents which show that he was made an offer but that he declined. Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), January 26, 2004.

[6] Muhammad Hilmi also has a son named "Saddam."

[7] An anonymous official of the Al-Multaqa Foundation stated that the foundation's relations with Iraq were limited to the distribution of its newspaper in Iraq. Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), January 26, 2004.

[8] Chad was mentioned at one time as a possible source of uranium for Iraq.

[9] Shbeilat issued a statement denouncing the publication of the names as an attempt to harm the reputations of nationalists who opposed the invasion of Iraq. Al-Quds Al-Arabi (London), January 28, 2004.

[10] Qi'war said: "This has no base in truth. They are merely accusations whose reasons I do not know." Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), January 26, 2004.

[11] Ms. Faisal maintains that the vouchers were meant for her political friend, Abd Al-Rahman Al-Qatarna, on whose behalf she intervened with the Iraqi authorities. Al-Quds Al-Arabi (London), January 28, 2004.

[12] Mr. Majali said the publication about him is false. He said he was a member of a popular committee for the support of Iraq, which provided medicines to Iraq paid for by the members of the committee "from their own pockets." Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), January 26, 2004.

Posted by 3dc 2004-10-17 7:24:05 PM||   2004-10-17 7:24:05 PM|| Front Page Top

#50 Mike:

To be brief, I believe the UN's best days are long past. It has devolved into an organization that allows the uneducated of the world to believe that "international law" exists. That *myth* then makes it that much harder for countries to take out despots and tyrants.

It would be a different matter entirely if the UN were composed of nations truly interested in democratic principles and the eradication of terror. Its plain to see however that the UN has no stomach for such ideals (or the hard work that is required to achieve them).
Posted by Crusader 2004-10-17 7:24:44 PM||   2004-10-17 7:24:44 PM|| Front Page Top

#51 That's too long, it needs to be shorter and make me happier. The UN Cafeteria is an excellent value isn't it Mike?

Show us the axe Mike.
What's your pure dime?
Posted by Butros Butros Catuah 2004-10-17 7:28:03 PM||   2004-10-17 7:28:03 PM|| Front Page Top

#52 Number 164 runs as follows:


Introduction

On January 25, 2004, the Iraqi independent daily Al-Mada published a list of approximately 270 individuals and entities who were beneficiaries of Saddam Hussein's oil vouchers. [1] The report evoked reactions from many of those included in the list as well as from the Arab media, among them apologists for Saddam's regime. The fact that so many have opted for silence may give credence to the list's authenticity.

A former undersecretary in the Iraqi Ministry of Petroleum, Abd Al-Saheb Salman Qutb, said that the ministry possesses documents proving the authenticity of the list published by Al-Mada. The list was originally the property of the State Oil Marketing Organization (SOMO), which was responsible for marketing Iraqi petroleum. [2] Mr. Qutb also said that the ministry was collecting the information for submission to Interpol, which could then pursue the voucher beneficiaries. [3]

The Iraqi Governing Council has focused on 46 foreign individuals and organizations included on the lists, primarily from neighboring countries, to determine appropriate action. [4] Council member Muwwafaq Al-Rabi'i said during a visit to Beirut that the council has "tons of documents" but emphasized that the publication of these documents will be handled in a constructive way and not "for the sake of vengeance and revenge." [5]

In describing what it called "the curse of the Iraqi vouchers," the London Arabic-language daily Al-Hayat said that it expects more names and details to be made public in the near future and anticipates the revelation of a scandal of vast dimensions transcending countries and continents, implicating many prominent individuals and organizations. [6]

How It Worked: The Voucher Transactions Method

In a subsequent article, Al-Mada provides details on the allocation and sale of oil vouchers. In general, the vouchers were given either as gifts or as payment for goods imported into Iraq in violation of the U.N. sanctions. The voucher holder would normally tender the voucher to any one of the specialized companies operating in the United Arab Emirates for a commission which initially ranged from $0.25 to $0.30 per barrel, though it may have declined in later years to as little as $0.10 or even $0.05 per barrel because of oil surplus on the market. [7] In other words, a voucher for 1 million barrels would have translated into a quick profit of $250,000-300,000 on the high side and $50,000-100,000 on the low side – all paid in cash. According to Al-Mada, Jordan will seek to tax the illicit profits of citizens who benefited from the sale of the vouchers.

One of the common arguments by recipients of vouchers was that the vouchers paid for goods provided in the framework of the U.N.-administered Oil for Food program. However, under the Memorandum of Understanding governing the program, oil allocations were intended for "end users," meaning those with refineries. Most of the voucher recipients would be considered "non-end users." Moreover, if vouchers were used to pay for goods, it would suggest that these were not authorized by the program and should be considered illicit since all contracts approved by the U.N. were reimbursed from the trust account where the oil revenues were kept, at a French bank, at Iraq's insistence. According to the United Nations: "The oil buyer had to pay the price approved by the Security Council Sanctions Committee into a U.N. escrow account, and the U.N. had to verify that the goods purchased by Iraq were indeed those allowed under the program. But the U.N. had no way of knowing what other transactions might be going on directly between the Iraqi government and the buyers and sellers." [8]

This report reviews the Saddam oil vouchers affair, in two parts:

Part I: (A) the list of oil vouchers recipients; and (B) reactions by implicated individuals and organizations.

Part II: Arab media reactions.

The Saddam Oil Vouchers Affair, Part I:

A. Complete List of Recipients of Oil Vouchers (in alphabetical order by country)

(All numbers for barrels of oil unless indicated otherwise)

All names on the list were transliterated from the Arabic. Although every effort was made to be precise, some inaccuracy is inevitable.


Algeria
1. Abd Al-Majid Al-Attar 6 million
2. Abd Al-Qadr bin Mussa 6 million

Austria
1. Hans Kogler 2 million
2. Arab-Austrian Committee 1 million

Bangladesh
1. Mawlana Abd Al-Manan 43.2 million

Bahrain
1. Kadhem Al-Darazi Company 2 million
2. Ali Al-Muslim Company 3 million
3. Concrete Contracting Company 2 million

Belarus
1. Liberal Party 6 million
2. Belarus Communist Party 7 tons
3. Belminal Company 14.2 million
4. Belfarm Company 4 million
5. Chief of the President's Bureau 6 million
6. Lada Company 2 million

Brazil
1. Fuad Sirhan 10 million
2. October 8 Movement (Chavez) 4.5 million

Canada
1. Arthur Millholland 9.6 million

Bulgaria
1. The Socialist Party of Bulgaria 12 million
2. Arak Paul 2 million

Chad
1.Chad Foreign Minister 3 million

China
1. Mr. Juan 39.1 million
2. Noresco 17.5 million
3. Zank Ronk 13 million
4. Biorg 13.5 million
5. South Holken 1 million

Cyprus
1. Muhammad Al-Hawny 17 million
2. Nefta Petroleum 13.2 million
3. Continental 1 million

Egypt
1. Ancom Co. (Muhammad Shatta)14 million
2. Abd Al-Adham Manaf 6 million
3. Khaled Gamal Abd Al-Nasser 16.5 million
4. Imad Al-Jilda 14 million
5. Muhammad Salah 7 million
6. Muhammad Hilmi 4.5 million
7. Arab Company limited 6 million
8. Nile & Euphrates Co. 3 million
9. Mahmoud Mahdi Al-Ma'sarawi 7 million
10. Al-Hami Bashanti Foundation 2 million
11.International MultaqaFoundation 2 million

France
1. ADDAX 8.3 million
2. Trafigura Patrick Maugein 25 million
3. Michel Grimard 17 million
4. Franco-Iraqi Friendship 15.1 million
5. Ayix 47.2 million
6. Charles Pasqua 12 million
7. Alias Al-Gharzali 14.6 million
8. IOTC (Claude Caspert) 4 million
9. Jean-Bernard Merimee 3 million
10. Jean-Bernard Merimee 8 million
11. de Souza 11 million

Hungary
1. Hungarian Interest Party 4.7 million

India
1. Biham Singh 5.5 million
2. Indian Congress Party 4 million

Indonesia
1. Daughter of President Sukarno 2 million
2. Hawa Atlantic 2 million
3. Makram Hakim 3 million
4. Megawati 8 million
5. Muhammad Amin Rayyis 4 million
6. Natuna Oil 2 million

Ireland
1. Riyadh Al-Taher 11 million
2. Afro-Eastern 2 million

Italy
1. Roberto Formigoni 24.5 million
2. Salvatore Nicotra 20 million
3. Mr. Feloni 6.5 million
4. Father Benjamin 4.5 million
5. West Petrol 2 tons
6. Hetralk 2 tons
7. IPS (Italian Petroleum Assoc.) 1 million

Jordan
1. Leith Shbeilat 15.5 million
2. Fakhri Qa'war 6 million
3. Grand Resource 2 million
4. Al-Rashid International (Ahmad Al-Bashir) 9 million
5. Fawwaz Zuraiqat 6 million
6. Salem Al-Na'ass 3 million
7. Zayyad Al-Ragheb 7 million
8. Mashhur Haditha 4 million
9. Shaker bin Zayd 6.5 million
10. Muhammad Saleh Al-Hourani 4 million
11. Tojan Faisal 3 million
12. Ministry of Energy (Jordan) 5 million
13. Zayyad Yaghmour 2 million
14. Wamidh Hussein 1 million

Kenya
1. Muhammad Othman Sa'id 10.5 million

Lebanon
1. B.B. Energy 2 million
2. Fadi Al-Alamiyya (International)2 million
3. Haitham Seidani 2 million
4. Plant [Blunt?] Petroleum 1 million
5. George Tarkhaynan 7 million
6. President Lehoud's son 4.5 million
7. Ali To'ma 1 million
8. Al-Hilal Co. (Adnan Al-Hanani) 1 million
9. International Company for Trade and Investment 3 million
10. Faisal Darniqa 3 million
11. Fim Oil Company 1 million
12. Najah Wakim 3 million
13. Osama Ma'rouf 3 million
14. Zuhair Al-Khatib 3.5 million

Libya
1. Shukri Ghanem 6 million

Malaysia
1. Fa'iq Ahmad Sharif 12.5 million
2. Pitmall Company 4 million
3. Trader Babar 4 million
4. Mastek (Fa'iq Ahmad Sharif0 57 million
5. Hawala 7 million

Myanmar Federation [Burma]
1. Minister of Forestry 5 million

Morocco
1. Abdallah Al-Sallawi 7.2 million
2. Nadhel Al-Hashemi 5.7 million
3. Muhammad Al-Basri 4.5 million

Netherlands
1. Sy Bolt 3 million

Nigeria
1. Hayson 7.2 million
2. Raz Company 7.5 million
3. A.A.G. Company (Nigerian Ambassador) 1 million
4. Comeback 4 million

Oman
1. Shanfari Group 5 million

Palestine
1. Abu Al-Abbas 11.5 million
2. Abdullah Al-Hourani 8 million
3. Wafa Tawfiq Sa'igh 3.5 million
4. Liberation Organization 4 million
5. Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine 5 million
6. Liberation Organization (Political Bureau) 5 million

Pakistan
1. Oil & Gas Group 10 tons
2. Abu Abd Al-Rahman 11.5 tons
3. Sayyed Azzaz 1 ton

Panama
1. Sevan 11.5 million

Philippines
1. Philippines Production Group 3 million

Qatar
1. Hamad bin Ali Al-Thani 14 million
2. The Duleimy Group 4 million
3. Gulf Petroleum 2 million
4. Petrolina Oil 2 million
5. Petroleum Wells Maintenance 2 million

Romania
1. Delf Aderlink 1 million
2. Romanian Labor Party 5.5 million

Russia
1. The Russian State 1.366 billion
2. Zarubesneft 174.5 million
3. Russneft Ampex 86.9 million (for the office of the president, including 1 million to Mr. Tetzenko, Russian Ambassador to Baghdad)
4. Communist Party Companies 137 million
5. Amircom (Unity Party/ Ministry for Emergencies) 57 million
6. Mishinoimport 1 million
7. Al-Fayco (Russian Foreign Ministry) 128.8 million
8. Yatumin (Russian Foreign Ministry) 30.1 million
9. Slavneft 25.5 million
10. Zan Gaz 49.1 million
11. Rosneft Company 35.5 million
12. Caspian Investment 8.5 million
13. Kamaneft Company 7.5 million
14. Gasprom 26 million
15. Tatneft 1 million
16. LUKoil 63 million
17. Surgut Neftegas 4 million
18. Siberia Oil & Gas company 1 million
19. Nafta Moscow Company 25.1 million
20. Onaco Company 22.2 million
21. Sidanco Company 21.2 million
22. Sibneft 8.1 million
23. Transneft 9 million
24. Yukos 2 million
25. Liberal Democratic Party (Zhirinovsky) 79.8 million
26. Peace and Unity Party 34 million (the list mentions party chairwoman Sazhi Umalatova)
27. Russian Committee of Solidarity with the People of Iraq 6.5 million (its chair, Sergei Rudasev is mentioned)
28. Russian Association for Solidarity with Iraq 12.5 million (its chair, [Zhorafilon] is listed)
29. Russneft-Gazexport 12.5 million
30. Uralinvest (Stroyev) 8.5 million
31. Moscow Science Academy 3.5 million
32. Romain (son of former ambassador to Baghdad) 19.7 million
33. Zarabsneft (Gobkin University) 3.5 million
34. Nordvest Group) 2 million
35. Zarbshneft & Gas (Mr. Hassan) 3 million (only one million delivered)
36. Soyuzneftgaz (Yuri Shafrannik) 25.5 million
37. Nikolayi Ryzhkov 13 million
38. Stroyneftgas 6 million
39. Akht Neft Company 4.5 million
40. Chechna Administration 2 million
41. 'Adel Al-Jablawi (I.N.M. Airways) 6 million
42. Khrozolit 5 million
43. Trader Nafta 3 million
44. Chief of the President's Bureau 5 million
45. Russian Orthodox Church 5 million
46. Russian National Democratic Party 3 million

Saudi Arabia
1. Najah Company 3 million
2. Asiss Company 2 million

Slovakia
1. Slovak Communist Party 1 million

South Africa
1. Imvume Management (Sandy Majali) 9 million
2. Tokyo Saxwele Holdings (MVL) 4 million
3. Montega 4 million
4. Omni Oil 4 million

Spain
1. Bassim Qaqish 17.5 million
2. Javier Robert 9.8 million
3. Ali Balutt 8.8 million

Sudan
1. Samasu 8 million
2. Petroleum Products Co. 2 tons
3. Oil Plus 2 tons

Switzerland
1. Media 2 million
2. Delta Service 2 million
3. Iblom 1 million
4. Sipol 1 million
5. Glencore 12 million
6. Lakia 2 million
7. Elkon [or Elcon] 23 million
8. Taurus 8 million
9. Petrogas 5 million
10. Finar [Holdings] 21 million
11. Napex Company 3 million

Syria
1. Awadh Ammura 18 million+
2. Beshara Nuri 12 million+
3. Ghassan Shallah 11 million
4. Muhammad Amar Nofel 3.5 million
5. Tamam Shehab 1 million
6. Hamida Na'na' 9 million+
7. Farras Mustapha Tlass 6 million
8. Salim Al-Toon 3.5 million
9. Lutfi Fawzi 2.5 million
10. Lid Guarantees 3.5 million
11. Ghassan Zacharia 6 million
12. Muhammad Ma'moun Al-Sab'i 4 million
13. Hassan Al-Kayal 2 million
14. Anwar Al-Aqqad 2 million

Thailand
1. Thai Rice Trader Jaiporn 1 million

Tunisia
1. Madex Petroleum 6.7 million
2. Farnaco 3.7 million
3. Maydor 4 million

Turkey
1. Zayn Al-Abideen Ardam 27 million+
2. Lutfi Dughan 1 million+
3. Muhammad Aslan 13 million
4. Techfen 15.5 million
5. KCK Company 1.5 million
6. Delta Petroleum 1 million
7. Sita 1 million
8. Ozia 2.5 million
9. Samir 2 million
10. Muhtashem 2 million
11. Maqdar Sarjeen 2 million

Ukraine
1. Social Democratic Party 8.5 million
2. Ukraine Communist Party 6 million
3. Energy Resources 2 million
4. Fazmash Ampex 2 million
5. Neftogas 8 million
6. Hugh Company (Sokolov) 5 million
7. Orshansky 4.5 million
8. Fideralty Torkovy 1 million
9. Trans Isko 1 million
10. The Ukranian House 1 million
11. F.T.D. 2 million
12. Socialist Party of Ukraine 2 million

United Arab Emirates
1. Fal Petrol 1.8 million
2. Ahmad Mani' Sa'id Al-Utaiba 11 million
3. Jewan Oil 7.5 million
4. Sultan bin Zayed Al-Nahyan 4 million
5. Al-Huda 22.9 million
6. Issa bin Zayed Al-Nahyan 5 million
7. Millenium 2 tons
8. Bony Fiol 1 ton

United Kingdom
1. George Galloway/Nawwaf Zuraiqat 19 million
2. Mujahideen Khalq 36.5 million

U.S.A.
1. Shaker Al-Khaffaji 7 million
2. Samir Vincent 10.5 million

Vietnam
1. Vinapco 1.2 million
2. Darlink Med 2 million
3. Vinafod 6 million
4. O.S.C. 2 tons

Yemen
1. Abd Al-Karim Al-Aryani 7.8 million
2. Tawfiq Abd Al-Raheem 1.5 million
3. Shaher Abd Al-Haq 7 million+

Yugoslavia
1. Socialist Party 22 million
2. Left Party 9.5 million
3. Italian Party 16 million
4. Kokostancha Party 9 million

B. Reactions of Implicated Individuals and Organizations

It is hardly surprising that most of those interviewed or those who reacted otherwise denied receiving such vouchers or claimed that the vouchers were received in the framework of the Oil for Food program. This latter argument is somewhat disingenuous because legitimate suppliers of goods and services under the program were paid from a trust account administered by the United Nations, and with vouchers from Saddam. Some may have made statements to newspapers not readily available to MEMRI, and others may have opted to remain silent.

Algeria

Abd Al-Majid Al-Attar, a formerdirector-general of the Algerian national oil company SONATRAC (6 million barrels) wrote a long rebuttal in the London daily Al-Hayatstating that the 6 million barrels were marketed by Algerian companies. According to him, the profits were used for humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people. Al-Attar likes to remind the reader "that every airplane [carrying assistance] which landed in Baghdad cost hundreds of thousands of dollars without getting involved in details" [emphasis added]. [9] Radio Algiers announced that the state would investigate allegations of corruption. [10]

Bahrain

Ali Al-Muslim (3 million barrels) said he had visited Iraq 22 times before the war but his trips were primarily "humanitarian," and that he had sent food and cleaning materials within the framework of the Oil for Food program. As a sign of appreciation, the regime offered Al-Muslim the opportunity to sell, as a broker, 3 million barrels. Al-Muslim ran into difficulties selling the vouchers and hence he withdrew from the deal.

Hassan Al-Darazi, the son of businessman Kadhem Al-Darazi (2 million barrels), said his father had made a pilgrimage to Mecca but that all his activities were "purely commercial." [11]

Bulgaria

The Socialist Party of Bulgaria (12 million). President Georgi Parvanov, head of the Socialist Party, characterized the allegation as "ill-advised black humor," but ordered an inquiry into the accusation. [12] President Parvanov also met with the U.S. Ambassador in Sofia and sought his help to clarify the facts regarding the list. [13]

Canada

Arthur Millholland, CEO of the Calgary-based Oilexco(9.6 million barrels), denied he had received vouchers and criticized MEMRI, which he claimed "was critical of the recent U.S.-led war with Iraq and participated in the UN's Oil for Food program to help Iraqi children [sic]." "Obviously," he hinted, MEMRI "has some motives." [14]

Egypt

Abd Al-Adhim Manaf (6 million barrels), the owner and editor of The Voice of the Arabs (Sawt Al-Arab), and a member of parliament, offered to show evidence that he had been offered oil vouchers, but had refused them. [15]

Muhammad Shatta (14 million barrels) maintained that he served as an agent for two international petroleum companies and that all his transactions were under the Oil for Food Program. He said there was small-scale smuggling of oil of 3000 barrels at a time by small merchants, but did not explain how the smuggling was related to the vouchers he received.

Khaled Abd Al-Nasser, the son of the late Egyptian president Gamal Abd Al-Nasser, (16.5 million barrels), could not be reached by the Egyptian weekly Roz Al-Youssef because all his phones "were out of order." However, the weekly cites a number of instances of Abd Al-Nasser's involvement in activities for solidarity with Iraq.

Egyptian MP Imad Al-Gilda (14 million barrels) denied receiving any vouchers. Roz Al-Youssefreported that there were rumors before the war that Al-Gilda was "part of the Iraqi propaganda machine."

Mahmoud Mahdi Al-Ma'sarawi (7 million barrels) attributes the inclusion of his and other names on the list to their stand against U.S. actions in Iraq.

Muhammad Hilmi (4.5 million barrels), who named his son Saddam, said he would be proud if his son would be another Saddam Hussein. [16] Otherwise, he denied the allegation.

It is noteworthy that Egyptian activist Mamdouh El-Sheikh filed suit in May 2003 against several Egyptian politicians and journalists, accusing them of accepting bribes from Saddam which violated Egyptian law. [17]

France

Former interior minister Charles Pasqua, (12 million barrels ) denied any involvement and suggested another, unnamed former French interior minister may have been the beneficiary. [18] According to The New York Post Mr. Pasqua, "a close friend and former colleague of Chirac … fought to allow visits by top Iraqi officials to France in 1993." [19]

Trafigura Patrick Maugein, CEO of the oil firm SOCO International (25 million barrels), was quoted as saying that he did a lot of business in Iraq under the Oil for Food program, "but none of it was illegal." [20] It was mentioned that the 55-year old businessman "appears to wield [influence] with President Jacques Chirac." [21]

Jean-Bernard Merimee, (3 million and another 8 million barrels) was the French Ambassador to the United Nations and France's representative in the Security Council.

Michel Grimard, (17 million barrels) is the founder of the French-Iraqi Export Club.

Gilles Munier, secretary general of the Franco-Iraqi Friendship Association, said his organization introduced numerous businesses, oil and otherwise, to contracts in Iraq, but that it was all perfectly legal. For each successful introduction, he said he "received a commission." [22]

Hungary

Hungarian Interest Party (MEP). Quoting from the Hungarian daily Nepszabadsag, the MEP was established by Izabella Kiraly B. in the fall of 1993 after her expulsion from the Hungarian Democratic Party. Ms. Kiraly refused to talk to the Hungarian newspaper but her website includes slogans such as: "Hands off Iraq!" "Peace Instead of War," and "America! Leave the World Alone in Peace!" On her site, President Bush in a Nazi uniform with the U.S. flag in hand repeats a famous statement by Hitler: "One People, One Empire, One Ruler" (ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuehrer). [23]

Indonesia

President Megawati Sukarnoputri (2 million as "daughter of President Sukarno" plus 8 million barrels under her own name). A spokesman told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation that President Megawati was "aware of the allegations." [24]

People's Consultative Assembly speaker Muhammad Amin Rayyis (4 million barrels) did not respond to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.

Italy

Roberto Formigoni (24.5 million) is the president of Lombardia.

Father Benjamin (4.5 million barrels) is a French Catholic priest who arranged a meeting between the Pope and Tariq Aziz, Iraq's former deputy prime minister. [25]

Salvatore Nicotra (20 million) is a former NATO pilot who became an oil merchant.

Jordan

Leith Shbeilat (15.5 million barrels) is an Islamist with a pro-Saddam record. He stressed that the United Nations system was so stringent that it would not have allowed anyone to play with oil contracts and that the publication of the list was intended "to slander those who were defending the Iraqi people." [26] Ironically, he served as the chairman of the anti-corruption committee of the Jordanian parliament. [27]

Fawwaz Zureiqat (6 million barrels) whose name was linked with the British MP George Galloway (see United Kingdom) said that the accusations are silly. He said that he had earned a commission of five cents per barrel, which had not been paid by the Iraqi government.

Tojan Faisal, a member of parliament (3 million barrels), said she acted to help a friend in need. She identified him as Abd Al-Rahman Al-Qatarna. [28]

Fakhri Qi'war (6 million barrels) is a former Jordanian MP and a journalist. He said the list "has no basis in truth and we do not know its reasons." He added that the accusation "is an attempt to slander those who stand against the American occupation of Iraq and stand with the Iraqi resistance and the Iraqi brethren and cooperate and support them." [29]

Wamidh Hussein (Majali) (1 million barrels) denied receiving oil. He said: "I was a member of the Popular Jordanian Committee for Solidarity with Iraq, and provided medicines. We paid for it from our own pockets." [30]

In response to a parliamentary question, Deputy Prime Minister Muhammad Al-Halaiqa said: "The issue is under follow-up, and we are seeking to verify whether some people have acquired [Iraqi] graft." [31]

Lebanon

Emil Emil Lahoud (4.5 million barrels) is a Lebanese MP and the son of Lebanese President Emil Lahoud. In an interview with the London daily Al-Sharq Al-Awsat, Lahoud maintained that his inclusion on the list was aimed at undermining the position taken by his father which "supports the [Palestinian] resistance, stands by Syria, rejects the occupation of Iraq, and demands the liberation of all the Palestinian lands." [32]

Osama Ma'rouf (3 million barrels), another MP and head of the Nasserite Popular Organization, admitted receiving a voucher to sell oil for commission. However, he added that the voucher had cost Iraq nothing and that he had in any event never exercised the option. [33]

Najah Wakim (3 million barrels), a former MP, denied the allegation, maintaining that Al-Mada editor Fakhri Kareem said on television, without specifying time or venue, that he received the list from the CIA without supporting evidence. [34] Kareem told the Lebanese daily Al-Nahar that he had never spoken with Wakim. [35]

Libya

Shukri Ghanem (6 million barrels) is the Libyan prime minister.

Morocco

Muhammad Al-Basri (4.5 million barrels) who has since died, was a former Moroccan Socialist leader. [36]

Panama

One surprise on the list was Mr. [Benon] Sevan (11.5 million barrels) who is the Executive Director of the Oil for Food program. A U.N. spokeswoman denied the charges and said that the U.N. secretary-general was completely satisfied with Sevan's integrity. [37] Mr. Sevan denied the allegations and stated that "it was incumbent on those who published these allegations to provide the necessary documents." [38]

Qatar

Abd Al-Aziz Mubarak Al-Duleimi (4 million barrels) said he had contracts to sell 10 million barrels as a broker under the U.N. supervision and had nothing to do with Saddam's coupons or bribes. [39]

Romania

Two entities are listed under Romania: Delf Aderlink ( 1 million barrels) and the Romanian Labor Party ( 5.5 million barrels). The following is a slightly edited version of an email to MEMRI from a Romanian journalist:

"The owner of Bulf Drilling, Cornel Bulf, is a pretty well known Romanian businessman, deeply involved in oil business. He has a lot of privileged businesses with the state-owned oil company Petrom. He claimed that all the Iraqi oil that he sold was with U.N. permission – and he showed me some approvals in this regard. Nevertheless, I take into consideration that he could have traded Iraqi oil both with and without approval, and that U.N. approvals were meant to cover his illicit trade.

"The son of the president of Labor Party, Ioan Cristian Nicolae, in connection with some politicians, has just bought a huge building in Bucharest for $1.5 million." [40]

Russia

Russia, which received the greatest number of oil vouchers, has said nothing.

Nikolay Ryzhkov (13 million barrels) was a U.S.S.R. prime minister.

South Africa

Tokyo Saxwele Mvelaphanda Holdings (MVL) reacted angrily to its inclusion in the list, but has not denied buying oil under the Oil for Food program. [41]

Spain

Ali Balutt or Balout (8.8 million barrels) is a Lebanese journalist. [42]

Switzerland

Glencore (12 million barrels) is the largest commodity trader in Switzerland.

Petrogas (5 million barrels) is listed in Switzerland under three sub-companies – Petrogas Services, Petrogas Distribution, and Petrogas Resources – and is associated with the Russian company Rosneftegazetroy (35.5 million barrels).

Syria

Hamida Na'na (over 9 million barrels) is the owner of Al-Wifaq Al-Arabi and the author of a biography of former Iraqi deputy prime minister Tariq Aziz. She is currently writing a biography of Iraqi general Ali Hassan al-Majid, known as Chemical Ali. [43]

Farras Mustafa Tlass (6 million barrels) is the son of Mustafa Tlass, Syrian Defense Minister and one of the pillars of the Syrian Ba'ath party. He said his company had bought oil from Iraq under the Oil for Food program and denied receiving any oil outside the framework of that agreement. [44]

United Kingdom

1. There is a reference on the margin of the list to "a Mr. Burhan Al-Chelebi" and "Fortrum and Gas-Oy," a Finnish purchasing company, in an agreement on December 29, 1999. There is also another reference to former MP George Galloway, as beneficiary of 3 million barrels.
2. There is another reference to George Galloway's receiving 4 million barrels, through Jordanian Fawwaz Zureiqat, of Aredio Petroleum, in an agreement on July 10, 2001.
3. Similarly, Middle East Advance Semi-Conductor, a Jordanian company, referred to Galloway as receiving 3 million barrels in an agreement on June 8, 2001, also via Mr. Fawwaz Zureiqat.
4. Similarly, March 5, 2001 - 2 million barrels
5. Similarly, December 12, 2002 - 3 million barrels
6. Similarly, June 3, 2002 - 3 million barrels

Thus, "George Galloway as beneficiary is cited six times, twice in the name of Finnish and French companies and the rest Jordanian under the name of Fawwaz Zureiqat. All these requests were approved by the minister of oil, with his signature." [45]

When asked by ABC News about being on the list, Galloway replied: "Not one brass farthing. I've never seen a barrel of oil, owned one, bought one." [46]

The Mujahideen Khalq (36.5) is an organization which opposes the Iranian regime which had operated from within Iraq under the Saddam regime. The United States has classified it as a terrorist organization and it has recently been ordered to leave Iraq.

United States

Shaker Al-Khaffaji (7 million barrels) advanced $400,000 to Scott Ritter, former U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq. Ritter produced a documentary purporting to tell the true story of the weapons inspections, which in his telling were corrupted by sinister U.S. manipulation. [47]

Samir Vincent (10.5 million barrels): In 2000, Vincent, an Iraqi-born American who lived in the U.S. since 1958, organized a delegation of Iraqi religious leaders to the U.S., which met with former president Jimmy Carter.

The Saddam Oil Vouchers Affair, Part II: Arab Media Reactions

Arab Media Ignore the List

In an op-ed titled "Beautiful Masks over Ugly Faces" in the London daily Al-Hayat, Salama Na'mat criticizes Arab television and other media for showing little interest in the oil voucher scandal. Because releasing the list shows Saddam Hussein's bribery of hundreds of politicians and journalists from 50 Arab and foreign countries, the Arab media have neither pursued the issue nor investigated the matter. In fact, Na'mat says, the publication of the list has triggered even less interest in official circles than in the media. Na'mat continues:

"The reality is that some Arab governments perhaps do not object that politicians and media people benefit from Saddam's bribes either because they are also involved or see no harm in bribes since it is a normal practice by the Arab regimes in varying degrees. Perhaps the political agenda of the deposed Iraqi regime was [no different] than the agendas of these governments. It mattered not to those who were bribed and those who shut their eyes that the money they received from the deposed regime to sing its praise were taken away from the Iraqi people which was destroyed by Saddam's wars and his stupid policies. [48]

Ahmad Al-Rab'i, a columnist in the London daily Al-Sharq Al-Awsat, points out that much of the Arab press, with the exception of the Iraqi, Jordanian, and Lebanese press, has not dared to publish the lists because they included powerful political figures. The Iraqi and Kuwaiti press, in particular, have reason to do so because they have been making the point that Saddam's defenders were not driven by nationalist or Islamic principles, but were paid off. [49]

An op-ed by Mazen Hammad in the Qatari daily Al-Watanunder the title "Publish the Names, May Allah Have Mercy on You!" wrote:

"The scandal is growing, and its threads, hour after hour, are encircling the necks of many who allege pan-Arabism and nationalism as well as those traders of opportunities. While it is too early to point an accusing finger at anyone in particular, those who have 'received' from the Saddam regime, in both Arab and non-Arab countries, for aggrandizing and defending him, count in the hundreds, if not more.

"The scandal is growing because among the names are heads of political parties, parliamentarians and the children of heads of states and governments.

"The scandal is growing because it is no secret that hundreds of apartments, Mercedes automobiles, cash and various grants were distributed by Saddam's aides to ministers, under secretaries, journalists, writers and artists.

"… It is also important that no one be excluded [from punishment] if his name appeared on the list regardless of the amount of his influence and the level of his position…

"[The scandal] is a flagrant example of the duality of the life of the Arab politician: he lectures nationalism during the day and nurses oil at night." [50]

'Once Again, the Citizens Pay'

Writing in the Kuwaiti daily Al-Siyassa, columnist Shaker Al-Nabulsi says: "At the outset, it appears that the list … is valid and the evidence is that some of those whose names where mentioned have not denied it." Al-Nabulsi's column focuses on Jordanian Islamist Leith Shbeilat, one of the biggest beneficiaries of Saddam's oil vouchers and one of the most vocal supporters of the Saddam regime in its heyday. Al-Nabulsi expresses his astonishment at the relationship between an Islamist who advocates an Islamic state run according to Shari'a law and the secular regime of Saddam which despised the clerics and killed and tortured many of them. [51]

Jubran Tweiny, the editor of the Lebanese daily Al-Nahar, wrote: "Once again, the country [Lebanon] and the citizens pay for the involvement of some officials in financial scandals and money laundering and oil 'vouchers,' the payment of bribes … without the authorities trying to put an end to them.

"It is incumbent on the state to respond clearly and forcefully to the sources of the news and prove the innocence of all those who were accused of receiving money from Saddam or smuggled money from the former Iraqi regime against commission." [52]

In the Kuwaiti daily Al-Siyassa,in an article titled "The Barrels of the Ba'ath," Daoud Al-Basri writes that the voucher scandal was not so much about the millions of barrels of oil given to "the militants and their international partners" as "a scandal for the international and Arab conscience and the environment of silence and deceit which accompanied all the stages of bribing…" He continued: "We will not forget the bribing of those who forged contemporary Iraqi history and those who made Saddam the anticipated Messiah of the Ba'ath." [53]

Al-Sharq Al-Awsat columnist Samir Attallah wrote in 'The Mother of [All] Vouchers:' "[What is really repulsive] is the language of the total purchase [of supporters] or total hatred … [the regime] needed people who hate what it hated and offended what it offended… What interests me about the vouchers and the Oil for Food [program] … are the wailings of the former president displaying pictures of children dying from hunger and disease … and the million and one stories about the poverty and neediness that transformed Iraq from a rich country to a country celebrating the birthday of a president who basks in his presidential palaces amidst poverty, silence, oppression, and the processions of the dead." [54]

Pro-Saddam Al-Quds Al-Arabi: The List is Only Alleged; Kill the Messenger

In the pro-Saddam London daily Al-Quds Al-Arabi, the paper's Baghdad correspondent writes about "the alleged oil list:"

"The publication of the list by the newspaper Al-Mada … did not draw much attention in Iraq because Iraqis were already familiar with this fact. Many Iraqis and particularly those involved in the oil trade business…were aware that the regime was selling quantities of its oil to oil companies and individuals with which it was associated or had good relations to circumvent the UN sanctions which controlled Iraq for 13 years. The policy of the old regime was to support anyone who stood by it or was trying to export goods to Iraq outside the sanctions." [55]

In another report from its correspondent in Amman, Jordan, Al-Quds Al-Arabi tried to divert attention towards the purported source of the list (according to him, this source was Iraqi Governing Council member and Iraqi National Congress head Ahmad Chalabi) and to smear him:

"The lighting of fire recently under the vouchers by the central figures of the Iraqi National Congress against Jordanian intellectuals and journalists is nothing new for the Jordanian government, or for the intellectuals themselves whom the new rulers of Iraq are trying to 'hit.'" [56]

Al-Jazeera: Faisal Al-Qassim's Hidden Pro-Saddam Agenda

Faisal al Qassim, host of the popular Opposite Direction program on Qatari Al-Jazeera satellite television, chose to attack, on his program devoted to the vouchers affair, not the beneficiaries but their critics. He said:

"Do these bribed, swindlers and the traders of homelands have the right to discuss honesty? Aren't the records of many of them blotted with bribes, swindling and fraud? How many millions did the previous Iraqi opposition receive from the Central Intelligence Agency?

"Can those who sold Iraq wholesale to the occupier open the files of corruption and the purchase of consciences…? It is true that the deposed regime wasted millions to buy friends and supporters, but haven't the newcomers handed Iraqi oil in its entirety to the American occupier? [57]

On February 17, 2004, the London Arabic-language daily Al-Hayatpublished Iraqi intelligence documents released by the Iraqi daily Al-Mu'tamar, the organ of the Iraqi National Congress, linking Faisal Al-Qassim to Iraqi intelligence. [58]

'They Must Be Published Morally'

Dr. Abd Al-Ghani Mahmoud, head of theinternational law department at Egypt's Al-Azhar University, provided a fitting epilogue to this affair. Dr. Mahmoud told the Egyptian weekly Roz Al-Youssef:

"Those who have the instruments to influence their peoples – intellectuals, politicians, political parties or institutions – have become in some of these countries propaganda mouthpieces for a corrupt dictatorial regime which has dragged the whole region into oblivion. This problem calls for a firm stand. Those who collected money from this regime, which destroyed its people with chemical weapons while enjoying a life of luxury in palaces during the sanctions, are partners in wronging the [Iraqi] people through their silence about the corruption… They must be punished morally by publishing their names and what they have received, so they will serve as an example for others." [59]

* Nimrod Raphaeli is a Senior Analyst at MEMRI.

[1] See MEMRI Inquiry and Analysis No. 160, January 29, 2004, 'The Beneficiaries of Saddam's Oil Vouchers: The List of 270,' http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=ia&ID=IA16004.

[2] Al-Zaman (Baghdad), January 26, 2004.

[3] Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), January 26, 2004.

[4] Al-Mashreq (Baghdad), January 30, 2004.

[5] Al-Siyassah (Kuwait), February 4, 2004.

[6] Al-Hayat (London), January 31, 2004.

[7] Al-Mada (Baghdad), February 7, 2004.

[8] A letter to the Wall Street Journal, February 18, 2004.

[9] Al-Hayat (London) February 5, 2004.

[10] Al-Zaman (Baghdad), February 12, 2004.

[11] Al-Hayat ( London), January 30, 2004.

[12] The Associated Press, January 28, 2004.

[13] Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), February 1, 2004.

[14] Calgary Sun (Canada), February 1, 2004.

[15] Al-Qahira (Egypt), February 3, 2004.

[16] Al-Ahram Al-Arabi (Egypt), May 24, 2003.

[17] Jamal Halaby, United Press International, January 28, 2004.

[18] Al-Zaman (Baghdad), January 28, 2004.

[19] The New York Post, January 28, 2004.

[20] The Daily Telegraph (London), January 28, 2004.

[21] Intelligence Online, #435 of August 29, 2002.

[22] The Daily Telegraph (London), January 28, 2004.

[23] BBC, January 29, 2004.

[24] Laksamana.Net (The Politics and Economics Portal), February 2, 2004.

[25] ABC News, January 29, 2004.

[26] Al-Quds Al-Arabi (London), January 28, 2004.

[27] Al-Siyassah (Kuwait), February 4, 2004.

[28] Al-Anwar (Lebanon), February 6, 2004.

[29] Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), January 26, 2004.

[30] Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), January 26, 2004.

[31] United Press International, January 28, 2004.

[32] Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), February 7, 2004.

[33] Al-Qassim Al-Mushtarak (Baghdad), February 11, 2004.

[34] Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), February 10, 2004.

[35] Al-Nahar (Lebanon), February 10, 2004.

[36] Al-Siyassah (Kuwait), February 4, 2004.

[37] Al-Hayat (London), January 30, 2004.

[38] Al-Zaman (Baghdad), February 11, 2004.

[39] Al-Sharq (Qatar), January 29, 2004.

[40] The email is dated February 2, 2004 and is in MEMRI's records.

[41] Sunday Times (Zambia), January 30, 2004.

[42] ABC News, January 29, 2004.

[43] Al-Siyassah (Kuwait), February 4, 2004.

[44] Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), January 26, 2004.

[45] Al-Mada (Iraq), January 25, 2004.

[46] ABC World News Tonight, January 29, 2004.

[47] http://slate.msn.com/id/2071502

[48] Al-Hayat (London), January 29, 2004.

[49] Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), January 31. 2004.

[50] Al-Watan (Qatar), February 2, 2004.

[51] Al-Siyassah (Kuwait), February 4, 2004.

[52] Al-Nahar (Lebanon), January 29, 2004.

[53] Al-Siyassah (Kuwait), February 4, 2004.

[54] Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), February 6, 2004.

[55] Al-Quds Al-Arabi (London), January 28, 2004.

[56] Al-Quds Al-Arabi (London), January 28, 2004.

[57] Al Jazeera (Qatar), February 3, 2004.

[58] Al-Hayat (London), February 17, 2004. The liberal Web site www.elaph.com published photocopies of the originals, February 15, 2004.

[59] Roz Al-Youssef (Egypt), January 31-February 6, 2004.


Posted by 3dc 2004-10-17 7:28:15 PM||   2004-10-17 7:28:15 PM|| Front Page Top

#53 That's not evidence unless we all agree it's evidence 3dc...

See how it works?
Posted by Shipman 2004-10-17 7:29:36 PM||   2004-10-17 7:29:36 PM|| Front Page Top

#54 Mike here is #172:



MEMRI Analyst's Testimony Before Congress on the U.N. 'Oil for Food' Scandal

Today [1], MEMRI Senior Analyst Dr. Nimrod Raphaeli testified about the U.N. 'Oil for Food Program' before the House Committee on Government Reform's subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats and International Affairs. The following is his testimony: [2]

The Testimony

Mr. Chairman: On January 25, 2004 the Iraqi daily Al-Mada published a list of 270 individuals and entities who were beneficiaries of Saddam Hussein's oil vouchers. The Middle East Media Research Institute, or MEMRI, translated the list from Arabic and made it available to non-Arabic readers on January 29.

In my presentation I will address five questions that we have frequently been asked:

First, what are these oil vouchers and how were they used?

Second, who were the beneficiaries?

Third, is the list authentic?

Fourth, what other means did Saddam Hussein use to subvert the Oil for Food Program?

Fifth, could the administrators of the Oil for Food Program have been unaware of the regime's subversion of the Program?

I shall now answer the questions briefly and in that order.

The Nature and Use of the Oil Vouchers

In May 2002, or two years before the oil vouchers achieved their present notoriety, MEMRI issued a special dispatch titled "Iraq Buys and Smuggles its Way out of UN Sanctions." [3] That dispatch catalogued techniques that were being used to subvert the Oil for Food Program, including the use of vouchers to buy friends.

In brief, Saddam Hussein granted oil vouchers to various beneficiaries - individuals as well as public and governmental entities - who could then sell them to oil dealers or agents operating from the Rashid Hotel in Baghdad. The agents would then sell the vouchers to oil companies which, in turn, would submit them to the State Oil Marketing Company or SOMO, to collect the oil. Both the beneficiary and the agent collected quick and handsome profits. A one million barrel voucher surrendered against $0.25 per barrel earned $250,000.

The Beneficiaries

The beneficiaries were from 52 countries and included 19 political parties, and numerous politicians and journalists. Russia led the way among countries, with 46 recipients for a total of about 2.5 billion barrels. Significant individual recipients include the president of Indonesia, the prime minister of Libya, the former prime minister of Yemen, a former French minister of interior, and Mr. Patrick Maugein who, according to French sources, is a financial supporter of French President Chirac.

Finally, the beneficiaries included the sons of the former Egyptian leader Gamal Abdul Nasser, the President of Lebanon Emil Lehoud, and the perennial Syrian minister of defense Mustafa Tlass.

The Authenticity of the List

There is a propensity among totalitarian regimes to keep accurate records of their misdeeds. The first half of the last century provides several examples. Saddam's regime provides another.

What gives credence to the authenticity of the list is the statements by many of those implicated that they had received the vouchers for goods which they provided under the oil for food program. These statements are, at best, disingenuous. Under the program, contracts had to be approved by the U.N., and upon the delivery of goods, the U.N. would reimburse the suppliers from the escrow account held at the French bank BNP-Paribas. No official contracts were financed by oil vouchers. Hence, if vouchers were granted they were given either as bribes or as payment for illicit goods, which could not be purchased under the program itself.

The Subversion of the Program by the Saddam Regime

Despite the sanctions, the regime of Saddam Hussein perfected a number of methods to sell oil for personal gains.

1. By the admission of Saddam Hussein's own son, Uday, Iraq exported to Syria approximately 200,000-250,000 b/d through the Kirkuk-Banias pipeline. Syria never denied it.

2. Trucks carried diesel oil from Kirkuk to southern Turkey. The Kurds who controlled northern Iraq were happy to collect transition fees.

3. Small Iraqi ships carried crude oil across the Persian Gulf mainly to Qatar for transshipment elsewhere. Many were intercepted and quite a few sank causing environmental damage.

4. Grains and other food supplies imported under the program were re-exported.

5. Legal shipments of oil were topped up by varying quantities with the excess sold for the benefit of the regime.

6. Invoices were inflated - a practice commonly referred to as pricing transfer.

The Knowledge, if Not the Complicity, of the UN Managers of the Program

On February 18, a month after the list was first published by Al-Mada, Mr. Shashi Tharoor, United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Communications and Public Information, wrote a letter to the editor of the Wall Street Journalprofessing ignorance of wrong doing. That letter makes two curious assertions. First, it protests, "No one at the United Nations has yet seen the original list." Note, please, that Al-Mada had published the list one month earlier.

Second, it offers an elaborate explanation of procedure. "The oil buyer had to pay the price approved by the Security Council Sanctions Committee into a U.N. escrow account, and the U.N. had to verify that the goods purchased by Iraq were indeed those allowed under the program." Mr. Tharoor then introduces the caveat: "But the U.N. had no way of knowing what other transactions might be going on directly between the Iraqi government and the buyers and sellers." Now comes the shocker: Mr. Tharoor says, "The program itself was managed strictly within the mandate given to it by the Security Council and was subject to nearly 100 different audits, external and internal, [I repeat, Mr. Tharoor says, '100 different audits'] between 1998 and 2003 and, as the secretary-general has said, this produced no evidence of any wrongdoing by the U.N. Official."

It is odd, indeed, that all these audits, paid for from $1 billion collected by the UN to administer the program, could not find one of the several infringements of the program that had been noted two years earlier by MEMRI – which has no access to official records.

Thank you Mr. Chairman.

[1] April 21, 2004.

[2] For the official transcript from the Hearing of the National Security, Emerging Threats, and International Relations subcommittee of the U.S. House Government Reform Committee, discussing the Iraq Oil for Food Program go to: http://memri.org/bin/media.cgi?ID=83004.

[3] See MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 382, May 20, 2002, "Iraq Buys and Smuggles Its Way Out of UN Sanctions."


Posted by 3dc 2004-10-17 7:30:30 PM||   2004-10-17 7:30:30 PM|| Front Page Top

#55 The punctuation on one citation is incorrect, therefore the argument is moot.
Posted by Shipman 2004-10-17 7:31:11 PM||   2004-10-17 7:31:11 PM|| Front Page Top

#56 Hellllooo! Don't follow my steps - Let Mike S do his own homework. If I post and say "the world is flat - check back at 1PM PST to see if you refute it, please provide sources/links" ......? Let Mike S. "Annansucker" play by himself, as he usually does
Posted by Frank G  2004-10-17 7:31:44 PM||   2004-10-17 7:31:44 PM|| Front Page Top

#57 Fair enough.
I smell payrolla.
Posted by Shipman 2004-10-17 7:33:40 PM||   2004-10-17 7:33:40 PM|| Front Page Top

#58 SHIPMAN: That's not evidence unless we all agree it's evidence 3dc...

See how it works?



We shoud make it clear that how it works is this:


Target identification. That's a good start for a target list in a target rich environment. For the individuals on the list we need to consider what sort of contracts should be let.

They should need to come clear and make amends to get off the target list.

Posted by 3dc 2004-10-17 7:35:26 PM||   2004-10-17 7:35:26 PM|| Front Page Top

#59 A quick Google Search turned up over 28,000 hits for "Oil for Food" +Annan. About 4/5 of them were not deferential to the current UN Secretary General. The general concensus is, he was either in on the take (most likely), or he's the most inept, brain-dead walking empty suit to have ever existed. Here are just a FEW of the links I checked:

http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/2004/04-19-2004/un.htm

http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/rosett200403212155.asp

Wikipedia Link

http://www.heritage.org/Research/InternationalOrganizations/bg1748.cfm

http://acepilots.com/unscam/

The best of the bunch:

http://www.krg.org/986/index.asp

Follow all the links.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,133371,00.html

http://www.cbn.com/CBNNews/News/040513a.asp

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/004/436zhuju.asp?pg=2

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/898433/posts

http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13140

http://www.heritage.org/Research/InternationalOrganizations/bg1772.cfm

http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pdupont/?id=110004968
Posted by Old Patriot  2004-10-17 8:09:29 PM|| [http://oldpatriot.blogspot.com/]  2004-10-17 8:09:29 PM|| Front Page Top

#60 
Re #47 (Ed): I already read Rosetts' article. You posted it for me once before. It doesn't have the details I want (see #45).

I assume that Cotecna is a long-established company that has done and continues to do a lot of business besides the food-for-oil program. I assume Cotecna occasionally hires consulting firms for all kinds of reasons that have nothing to do with the food-for-oil program.

Really, Rosett's article has no evidence, except for a general smear, that incriminates Kofi or Kojo Annan.
.
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-10-17 8:36:47 PM||   2004-10-17 8:36:47 PM|| Front Page Top

#61 
Re #50 (Crusader): Thanks for your opinion about the UN, Crusader.

I believe there is such things as 1) international law and 2) practical limitations on "taking out despots and tyrants". If the UN disappeared tomorrow, there would still be international law and there would still be such limitations.
.
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-10-17 8:43:46 PM||   2004-10-17 8:43:46 PM|| Front Page Top

#62 We are at Priss Factor 4.
Posted by Nelson 2004-10-17 8:47:55 PM||   2004-10-17 8:47:55 PM|| Front Page Top

#63 
Re: ## 49, 52 and 54 (3dc)

Gee, thanks for the long posts, 3dc. I appreciate your enthusiasm! How do they show that Kofi and Kojo Annan personally skimmed money off the food-for-oil program? Help me out here, buddy.
.

Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-10-17 8:52:04 PM||   2004-10-17 8:52:04 PM|| Front Page Top

#64 
Re: #59 (Old Patriot) About 4/5 of them were not deferential to the current UN Secretary General. The general concensus is, he was either in on the take (most likely)

Maybe 4/5 of them are presumptuous, since so far I haven't seen any evidence that Kofi Annan is on the take. The only "evidence" I've seen is that his son Kojo 1) worked on the Cotecna staff 13 months before the UN contract and then 2) worked for a consulting firm that did consulting firm for Cotecna. That's all the evidence there is. There isn't one bit of evidence beyond those vague associations. So far, there isn't even the slightest bit of published evidence that Cotecna did anything wrong.

So, Saddam Hussein secretly gave out all these vouchers. Did he give them out through Cotecna? Did Cotecna know about these vouchers? Did Kofi or Kojo Annan know? I don't think so.

As I understand, Saddam's this voucher business was revealed after the USA invaded Iraq and seized Iraqi secret documents. Until then, practically nobody knew about this scheme.
.
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-10-17 9:06:00 PM||   2004-10-17 9:06:00 PM|| Front Page Top

#65 It is odd, indeed, that all these audits, paid for from $1 billion collected by the UN to administer the program, could not find one of the several infringements of the program that had been noted two years earlier by MEMRI – which has no access to official records.

Sort of leaps out from the page at you. Mike, if you are seriously suggesting that the UN continues to deliver anything of the remotest value in return for however many untold BILLIONS of dollars it continues to suck out of the world economy, such an assertion casts suspicion upon either your rationality or intelligence. I'll permit you to choose which.
Posted by Zenster 2004-10-17 9:30:35 PM||   2004-10-17 9:30:35 PM|| Front Page Top

#66 65 posts! Acck..i can't read them all. I just wanted to note; Annan also dismissed suggestions that France, Russia and China had, before the recent Iraq war, been prepared to ease sanctions on Iraq in return for oil contracts. Disputing claims made in the final report of the U.S.-led Iraq Survey Group which suggested Saddam Hussein had manipulated the U.N.’s oil-for-food program in an attempt to win Security Council support for lifting sanctions, Annan said it was "inconceivable" the three countries were influenced

HA!!! I can't believe I reading this from Reuters!! Even if it is because the are just trying to explain it away...it is veddy interesting, as Reuters would never peddal this thought unless they believed it was already CW that they felt obligated to debunk. *snicker*
Posted by 2b 2004-10-17 9:52:23 PM||   2004-10-17 9:52:23 PM|| Front Page Top

#67 
Re #65 (Zenster): The audits were paid out of $1 billion collected to administer the food-for-oil program. That doesn't mean the audits cost $1 billion.

If the audits cost one cent, then that one cent was paid out of $1 billion collected to adminster the program.

If the audits cost one dollar, then that one dollar was paid out of $1 billion collected to adminster the program. And so on and so forth.

In other words, the billion dollars in the sentence is totally meaningless as a measure of the expenditure for the audits.

Were the auditors negiligent in not knowing that Saddam Hussein was giving vouchers to individuals throughout the world? How were the auditors to know?

If you, Zenster, come and audit my personal finances, would you necessarily know that I am secretly giving out vouchers? I take a piece of paper and write an IOU on it, and I secretly give that piece of paper to my good friend Frank G. This voucher entitles Frank G to siphon some gas out of my gas tank sometime in the future.

How, Zenster, would your audit catch this subtrifuge? You might look in my gas tank, and it would be full. I didn't give Frank G any gasoline, I gave him only a voucher -- a piece of paper -- an IOU.

Also, keep in mind that these vouchers seem to represent a lot of petroleum to us mere mortals. In the scale of Iraq's petroleum output, though, they represented petty cash.
.



Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-10-17 10:04:52 PM||   2004-10-17 10:04:52 PM|| Front Page Top

#68 
Re #66 (2b) the U.S.-led Iraq Survey Group which suggested Saddam Hussein had manipulated the U.N.’s oil-for-food program in an attempt to win Security Council support for lifting sanctions, [but] Annan said it was "inconceivable" the three countries were influenced

Saddam Hussein's vouchers did not significantly influence the UN votes of any Security Council members. If that's what Kofi Annan meant in this passage, then he is right about that.
.
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-10-17 10:14:43 PM||   2004-10-17 10:14:43 PM|| Front Page Top

#69 In other words, the billion dollars in the sentence is totally meaningless as a measure of the expenditure for the audits.

The one billion dollar figure is not without merit. It is ample demonstration of just how awash with cash the UN's oil-for-palaces scam was. Without wishing to be too cynical, the UN's inability to find any mismanagement within their own extraordinarily inept executive structure is about as likely as a male inmate not being able to find his @ss with both hands in a Turkish prison.
Posted by Zenster 2004-10-17 10:29:16 PM||   2004-10-17 10:29:16 PM|| Front Page Top

#70 3Dc Thank you so much for posting the U.N./Saddam Oil-for-Food data!

Posted by Mark Espinola 2004-10-17 11:19:01 PM||   2004-10-17 11:19:01 PM|| Front Page Top

#71 . Without wishing to be too cynical, the UN's inability to find any mismanagement within their own extraordinarily inept executive structure is about as likely as a male inmate not being able to find his @ss with both hands in a Turkish prison.

You're assuming he still has hands.
Posted by Charles  2004-10-17 11:29:08 PM||   2004-10-17 11:29:08 PM|| Front Page Top

#72 
Re #69 (Zenster): The one billion dollar figure is .... ample demonstration of just how awash with cash the UN's oil-for-palaces scam was.

I don't know what the billion-dollar figure comprises. I am sure, though, that it's more than just auditing expenses.

Keep in mind that this oil-for-food program was part of the UN's sanctions on Iraq. Although the UN sanctions were not perfect, they also were not trivial. Ever since the first Gulf War, I think the USA has been much more satisfied than not that the UN imposed and maintained the sanctions on Iraq for so many years.

Keep in mind also that the UN didn't give out the oil vouchers. Saddam Hussein gave them out, and he did it secretly. He hid this voucher business from the world in general and from the UN in particular. Only the individual recipients were supposed to know about them.
.
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-10-17 11:59:29 PM||   2004-10-17 11:59:29 PM|| Front Page Top

#73 You're assuming he still has hands.

We find only mouths! For greedy input and idiotarian output.
Posted by wits0  2004-10-18 12:01:26 AM||   2004-10-18 12:01:26 AM|| Front Page Top

06:55 Snereck Thrush8432
13:07 tu3031
13:02 Jules 187
12:52 lex
12:44 lex
12:43 lex
12:37 Frank G
12:35 Jules 187
12:27 lex
12:21 lex
12:17 lex
12:16 Mrs. Davis
12:16 lex
12:13 Jules 187
12:02 lex
03:56 .com
03:52 Conanista
03:44 Sock Puppet of Doom
03:36 .com
03:33 Sock Puppet of Doom
03:31 .com
03:27 Sock Puppet of Doom
03:18 Conanista
03:12 Conanista









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com