Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 10/18/2004 View Sun 10/17/2004 View Sat 10/16/2004 View Fri 10/15/2004 View Thu 10/14/2004 View Wed 10/13/2004 View Tue 10/12/2004
1
2004-10-18 International-UN-NGOs
United Nations no hero
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Mark Espinola 2004-10-18 12:55:12 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 She's correct, but vastly understates the case.

The UN wasn't even designed to be the sort of supra-national state that is implied by most of the poorly reasoned gibberish coming from the likes of Kerry. Its principle is collective security -- security provided by collaboration of member states, using the UN as a coordinating mechanism and means of marshalling political support. She incorrectly places Bush's and Kerry's references to the UN on the same plane, implying they're both incorrect. Uh uh.

There's also a line that only reads humorously now, about "historical allies" -- unless it refers to the UK, Australia, etc., of course.

Overall, though, while she mentions that it's "odd" that the stupendous scandal represented by UNSCAM has received so little attention, it's clearly much more than that. Outrageous, unbelievable, scandalous in itself. But I suppose Ms. Applebaum can't be expected to state the obvious about out-of-control media distortion.
Posted by Verlaine 2004-10-18 1:05:49 AM||   2004-10-18 1:05:49 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 No hero, no question about that. Now a proven crook. A superstition like it was with the Golden Calf worship circa 2500 years ago.
Posted by wits0  2004-10-18 9:25:07 AM||   2004-10-18 9:25:07 AM|| Front Page Top

#3  This negligence does not, I should add, mean that the United Nations should be kicked out of New York or that the United States should stop paying U.N. dues.

Can anyone supply even a shred of evidence that this asumption is true? Supply links. Neatness counts.
Posted by Mikey Silvester 2004-10-18 9:32:38 AM||   2004-10-18 9:32:38 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 9.9. The blog goes wild!
Posted by Shipman 2004-10-18 11:03:14 AM||   2004-10-18 11:03:14 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 I'll be back at 12 to see the links, the evidence, the corpus delicatable, the photostat, the real deal, the mccoy
Posted by Shipman 2004-10-18 11:04:54 AM||   2004-10-18 11:04:54 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 Ship, I won't be back for this one bro', as soon as the real Mike S and other players get involved this will be a 50+ post thread in 3 hrs.
Posted by Jarhead 2004-10-18 11:30:16 AM||   2004-10-18 11:30:16 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 naahhhh I'm tired of Mikey, Aris, et al
Posted by Frank G  2004-10-18 11:32:29 AM||   2004-10-18 11:32:29 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 Frank G, Me too. So, stop feeding them. You too, .com.
Posted by Mrs. Davis 2004-10-18 11:39:37 AM||   2004-10-18 11:39:37 AM|| Front Page Top

#9 Gee, the UN isn't a lofty community of idealistic nations working for peace in a spirit of groovy love vibration after all! Whoda thunk it?
Posted by Mike  2004-10-18 12:35:59 PM||   2004-10-18 12:35:59 PM|| Front Page Top

04:30 Aussie
16:30 .com
16:28 Frank G
16:17 Jennifer
11:55 ed
11:54 Frank G
11:49 Jennifer
16:41 Ulique Clavise4987
07:23 AmericanIdiot
07:09 rovvy
10:46 Jules 187
03:45 2b
02:09 Sock Puppet of Doom
01:03 AzCat
00:51 Kalle (kafir forever)
00:43 AzCat
00:27 Kalle (kafir forever)
00:25 Kalle (kafir forever)
00:13 Kalle (kafir forever)
00:11 mojo
00:03 Kalle (kafir forever)
23:52 Kalle (kafir forever)
23:48 Kalle (kafir forever)
23:45 Kalle (kafir forever)









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com