Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 10/22/2004 View Thu 10/21/2004 View Wed 10/20/2004 View Tue 10/19/2004 View Mon 10/18/2004 View Sun 10/17/2004 View Sat 10/16/2004
1
2004-10-22 Iraq-Jordan
US Soldier Gets 8 Years for Iraq Jail Abuse
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2004-10-22 9:29:32 PM|| || Front Page|| [7 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 it's going to be a long 8 years for Mr. Panty Boy. I'm sure he'll be the defacto belle of the ball at Levenworth.
Posted by 2b 2004-10-22 12:29:34 AM||   2004-10-22 12:29:34 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 He will be in administrative segregation. He will not be in the general population.
Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom  2004-10-22 12:55:31 AM|| [http://www.slhess.com]  2004-10-22 12:55:31 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 I get a lot of things, but I do not get this guy going to jail. This guy was a prison guard in civilian life. There is no way he did all these things at a U.S jail. The reserves didn't teach him all these methods. I want to know why the contractor MI's are not going to jail. The MI's are the ones that taught him and ordered him to do things. I know the contractor MI's don't direct authority over him but happend in this case, is that Sgt. Frederick's CO's ordered him to obey the contractor MI's.

Here is what would help me. I need a real world experienced (possibly 10yrs or more) NCO here at RB to explain to me 1.why I am wrong? and 2.why this Sgt. is going to jail even for 1 day?
Posted by Poison Reverse 2004-10-22 7:17:42 AM||   2004-10-22 7:17:42 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 PR, he earned jail time for acts unbecoming a Staff NCO. If these prisoners (no matter how bullshit I find this) were accorded the geneva convention then he needed to protect them from humiliation etc. To me, that's the key question, did we give non-uniformed combatants geneva rights? I heard we did. Second, he knocked up a junior soldier (Lyndie England) in his command. That's fraternization of the worst kind and earns him a lengthy brig stay. 8 yrs seemed excessive to me, I would of said 3 yrs and BCD for combo of geneva violations and banging a junior soldier in his chain of command.

You raise a good point that I've been unable to find out. What's the deal w/the MI's and what was their involvement? This bothered me from the get go. Was Frederick told by his CO to obey the MIs? If so, then all are culpable and should be prosecuted. What's right is right. I'm concerned that there might be witch-hunting of junior troops if the officers in the chain gave tacit approval to the so-called abuse. I say it's "so-called" because I could give a fuck how they made these pussies get in a naked pyramid. Much ado about nothing imho. BTW-fuck seymour hersch.
Posted by Jarhead 2004-10-22 8:38:40 AM||   2004-10-22 8:38:40 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 Jarhead,

Thanks for the info.

As far as Sgt. Frederick knocking up Lyndie, he broke quite a bit of military and moral laws. The report stated that he is "church-going". If he is a dedicated "father of two" and "church-going", what's he doing commiting adultery and/or fornication? Conversely, since I am not qualified to cast the first stone, I won't. That's between him and Jesus.

But, the truth of the matter is, there are all kinds of sexapade's going on in the military and everyone knows it. The Sgt. happened to get caught. Bottomline, in my opinion, he is just another casuality of "lower-level troop" scape goating. I am, like you, sick of it.
Posted by Poison Reverse 2004-10-22 9:35:50 AM||   2004-10-22 9:35:50 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 I thought Lynndie was carrying Graner's baby?
Posted by Seafarious  2004-10-22 9:37:15 AM||   2004-10-22 9:37:15 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 - "BTW-fuck seymour hersch."

I second the motion.
Posted by docob 2004-10-22 9:42:52 AM||   2004-10-22 9:42:52 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 They probaby won't know whose it is till they do the DNA test.

For the damage he did this country and its armed forces, I wouldn't have been unhappy if this guy saw the muzzle end of a firing squad.
Posted by Mrs. Davis 2004-10-22 10:02:41 AM||   2004-10-22 10:02:41 AM|| Front Page Top

#9 I thought Lynndie was carrying Graner's baby?
Posted by: Seafarious


I believe that the answer to this question is who knows? Until paternity tests are done we have no idea who fathered her child.

Recall that there were videotaped orgies going on with England and one other female soldier playing mattressback. Your guess as to who sired the child is as good as anybody elses.


PR- When looking at someones actions you can say that what theyr are doing is a sin, that is not judgemental. The fact that they are sinning is between them and God, you should not attempt to insert yourself in condemning them to Hell. Fact of the matter this guy knew better than to do what he did and now must not only face the music with the military, but with his family and his religion.

My only sympathy with this entire group is that they should have known better than to take pictures. Without pictures it would all just have been Urban Legend.
Posted by Jame Retief  2004-10-22 10:07:26 AM||   2004-10-22 10:07:26 AM|| Front Page Top

#10 I would also be interested in if the CO gave instructions for security to cooperate with MI on interregation techniques and follow their instructions. Even still, an E-6 is commonly in charge of a security detail/squad and should have reported the unusual techniques to his first sarge or his CO. Seems the whole security company was seriously lacking in leadership, training or both. Allowing picture taking and cameras in a secure facility without any control is the serious breach and the CO should take full reponsibility for that. 8 years? Well, again, Fredrick should have stopped that and thats what bought him the eight years. If no pictures were taken, he might have just gotten reprimanded if anything.
Posted by Johnnie Bartlette 2004-10-22 10:18:33 AM||   2004-10-22 10:18:33 AM|| Front Page Top

#11 Jame,

I think you need slowly read my response to Jarhead. Which part of my quote "Conversely, since I am not qualified to cast the first stone, I won't. That's between him and Jesus.", do you not understand?

BTW, I never used the word "hell", that's your word, not mine.
Posted by Poison Reverse 2004-10-22 10:31:42 AM||   2004-10-22 10:31:42 AM|| Front Page Top

#12 ..I had expected maybe 3 and a kick for Frederick, and I do consider 8 years a bit heavy - but on the other hand, people - prison guards or not - will think twice before doing ANYTHING that stupid again.

Mike
Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2004-10-22 11:55:52 AM||   2004-10-22 11:55:52 AM|| Front Page Top

#13 Christians are commanded, via Paul, to note people who behave in a disorderly way and avoid them. That's a long ways from the stones in the hands of the people to which Jesus directed the phrase "Let him who is without sin cast the first stone".

I discuss the entire incident as part of a larger discussion of Capital Punishment at my website here.
Posted by Ptah  2004-10-22 12:43:26 PM|| [http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org]  2004-10-22 12:43:26 PM|| Front Page Top

#14 Actually, Poison Reverse, the idiot had been up on charges several times at the prison where he worked for the same kind of behaviour. I remember reading about it here at Rantburg. I may be mistaken, but I think that the attitude that engendered these acts were what drove him out of the regular army in the first place. (Feel free to scroll through Rantburg's archives to find the details. Its been posted on more than once in the past year.)
Posted by trailing wife 2004-10-22 1:29:03 PM||   2004-10-22 1:29:03 PM|| Front Page Top

#15 tw,

"up on charges several times at the prison where he worked"

Thanks, I did not know that. He probably is a sadist. If it's true, he reminds me of the prison guard from the movie, The Shawshank Redemption.
Posted by Poison Reverse 2004-10-22 1:40:29 PM||   2004-10-22 1:40:29 PM|| Front Page Top

#16 The excerpt above leaves out some details: Frederick is accused of punching a handcuffed detainee directly in the chest that night, to the point of thinking he had caused cardiac arrest.

These NCOs, Frederic and Graner, it was stated, witnessed and encouraged acts like stepping on fingers and toes to break them.

You won't find a stronger defender of our military here at Rantburg than me -- as some of you know -- and for precisely that reason I think the punishment is more than appropriate.
Posted by rkb 2004-10-22 3:29:10 PM||   2004-10-22 3:29:10 PM|| Front Page Top

18:17 Syaifullah
18:31 Syaifullah
18:27 Syaifullah
18:41 syaifullah
18:32 Syaifullah
22:34 Ptah
19:13 Bulldog
19:04 Alaska Paul
18:46 Frank G
18:27 Ptah
13:33 Glising Croter5991
12:48 Snoluck Thrusing6666
12:36 Glising Croter5991
02:07 mojo
01:51 Kalle (kafir forever)
00:37 trailing wife
00:23 trailing wife
00:16 Aris Katsaris
00:05 .com
00:01 trailing wife
23:57 incarnate of lee atwater
23:54 trailing wife
23:50 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:50 trailing wife









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com