Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
#1 Traitorous narcissistic scum. It's all about him and his reelection. He throws missile defense of Americans and allies out to save his skinny ass.
THIS is s BFD
Posted by Frank G 2012-03-26 09:47||
#2 President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.
After my election, Michelle and I can do anything we damn well phueching please.
[note his stated mownership of the election process]
Posted by Besoeker 2012-03-26 09:53||
#3 Gee does this mean that you probably can't trust anything he says on this issue between now and November?
Of course that would make it just like every other issue wouldn't it?
Posted by AlanC 2012-03-26 10:56||
#4 As Frank G said this is a BFD. The President is telling the Russians that he will be more willing to do something after the American people have judged his actions and determined he was worthy of re-election. What is it he would do that he must defer until after that judgement?
Obviously it is something that would be detrimental to his prospects of re-election, and hence cannot be considered beneficial to those whom he serves.
Gee, can you get any more clear evidence, out of his own mouth in an unguarded moment, of what a liar, and disingenuous man we have in the office?
Posted by NoMoreBS 2012-03-26 13:39||
#5 Does this mean, give me more time so I can get re-elected in a rigged election such as Putin had? And then this missile deal that we have can be pulled off?
Buggered by communists and a Manchurian candidate.
I agree with Frank G.
Posted by JohnQC 2012-03-26 17:00||
#6 Ya know, if I were a die-hard supporter of, or even more so a booster, obama I would be banging my head through a basement wall at the sheer incompetence of such a lazy and rookie mistake.
Posted by swksvolFF 2012-03-26 17:01||
#7 I think what he means he will have a lot of time on his hands after the election when a new President takes over and if Russia needs a savior they need just ask.
Posted by Rjschwarz 2012-03-26 17:04||
#8 Messiah need space, lots of space.
Posted by Rjschwarz 2012-03-26 17:05||
#9 Well, at least he haven't mentioned Russia punching above it's weight.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2012-03-26 18:04||
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2012-03-26 18:14||
#11 Look, isn't that the transaxle America?
Posted by Procopius2k 2012-03-26 18:47||
#12 Personally, I'm more interested in the Bammer inference that post-2016 OWG Mighty USSA = OWG Weak USRoA may still be dealing wid VLADVEDEV-IAN RUSSIA.
* "Detrimental to his re-election" > IOW, the state of the tote US Economy leading up to November.
No US-Iran ground war = Iran will get its Nukes = POTUS Obama will likely have to "Spend Spend Spend" on GMD-TMD during his second term + NOT make any serious compromise wid Russia. IFF ANYTHING, NUCLEAR IRAN + by extension poten NUCLEAR RADICAL ISLAM/TERROR = IT'LL BE RUSSIA WHOM ACCEDE TO THE US ARGUMENT.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2012-03-26 19:43||
#13 OWG Caliphate-happy Nuke-armed Shia Iran + OWG Caliphate-happy Nuke-armed Taliban, MilTerr-controlled Pakistan + Ditto? Nuke-armed/capable? wannabe? pro-Islamist ME Muslim Govts = trouble for Moscow + Beijing.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2012-03-26 19:47||
#14 It's all about him and his reelection.
He'll push for it whether he's re-elected or a lame duck. The difference is that, if it's the latter, he'll have to shoehorn it in with the rest of his agenda he wants passed before inauguration day.
Posted by Pappy 2012-03-26 21:53||
#15 nice thing about that, Pappy is the Filibuster. While he and the Dems haven't felt restrained in the past by constitutional limited powers, they would then. What I find extremely interesting is a "Pardon Pool". Perhaps I'll start one up. First on the list? Holder
Posted by Frank G 2012-03-26 22:10||
#16 Question is, if nobody brings charges against Holder until after Obama leaves office, can he still be pardoned ahead of time?
Posted by rjschwarz 2012-03-26 23:41||