Article

2013-04-30 Home Front: WoT

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by tipper 2013-04-30 13:13|| || Front Page|| [5 views ] Top

#1 It's been 5 years , what political panic causes this to be Broadcast NOW?
Obama CAN'T be re-elected, Again.

Posted by Redneck Jim 2013-04-30 13:23|| 2013-04-30 13:23|| Front Page Top

#2 SQUIRREL!!!!!

Posted by AlanC 2013-04-30 14:29|| 2013-04-30 14:29|| Front Page Top

#3 Hang them all and close it down. Blame it on the sequestor.

Posted by airandee 2013-04-30 14:33|| 2013-04-30 14:33|| Front Page Top

#4 I hear there are some hungry sharks in the waters off Cuba. Just sayin'....

Posted by Barbara 2013-04-30 14:57|| 2013-04-30 14:57|| Front Page Top

#5 Combine airandee and Barbara.

Release them all in a small leaky boat with only a gallon of gas. Hey, can't pay for maintenance or gas with the sequester in place.

Chumming the water? ;^)

Posted by AlanC 2013-04-30 15:30|| 2013-04-30 15:30|| Front Page Top

#6 Boston shows that America is safe to close the AlQ POW camp.

Posted by Bright Pebbles 2013-04-30 15:41|| 2013-04-30 15:41|| Front Page Top

#7 And where will the inmates go? A lot of them face certain death if they return to their own countries. Maybe Obama could give them refuge in the US, say Boston.

Posted by tipper 2013-04-30 16:35|| 2013-04-30 16:35|| Front Page Top

#8 Chumming the water? ;^)

Heck I bet a lot of sports fishermen would be willing to go out and chum the waters around the leaky boat for free - won't cost a dime of Taxpayer money.

Posted by CrazyFool 2013-04-30 17:05|| 2013-04-30 17:05|| Front Page Top

#9 "And where will the inmates go? A lot of them face certain death if they return to their own countries."

What's the downside, tipper?

Posted by Barbara 2013-04-30 18:43|| 2013-04-30 18:43|| Front Page Top

#10 No one truly wants to see Baby Assad deposed, no one truly wants to see Gitmo closed, everyone knows the outcvome or solution to same is potens mucho worse than the original problem, THUS OF COURSE WE hve have Have HaVe HAVE H-A-V-E
HHHAAAAAVVVVEEEEEE, D **** YOU, TO DO IT!

WHUT COULD POSSIBLY GO WRONG!?

Posted by JosephMendiola 2013-04-30 19:20|| 2013-04-30 19:20|| Front Page Top

#11 What's the downside, tipper?
Barbara, the downside is that Obama will go all "humanitarian and compassionate" and allow them to settle in the US instead perhaps becoming your new neighbor.
Just think of the fun it will be playing "dodge the bomb" and kill the kuffar with them.

Posted by tipper 2013-04-30 19:24|| 2013-04-30 19:24|| Front Page Top

#12 tipper, I believe this dilemma is why Obozo's initial attempts to close Gitmo during his first term fizzled out. Nowhere else to put them. Home countries don't want them back, but relocating them to US soil would cause a political/PR shitstorm. Apparently the feds were pretty close to buying a vacant prison in rural Illinois, but that fell through. Locals were very relieved.

Obozo is using the passive voice here, like he is still a senator or some outside advocate or agitator, and not the man in charge. He does that when he's just pandering to his base. They'll still worship him for his empty words and meaningless gestures, but he's stuck. He may not have to run for re-election, but congressional Democrats do. Nothing will change.

Posted by RandomJD 2013-04-30 20:02|| 2013-04-30 20:02|| Front Page Top

#13 tipper, I meant what was the downside of these clowns facing certain death if they returned to their home countries. I say give 'em a free ride.

Posted by Barbara 2013-04-30 21:45|| 2013-04-30 21:45|| Front Page Top

#14 Suggesting a parachute drop (we're human) in the Rub al Khali. The prophet will guide them to Mecca from there.

Posted by European Conservative 2013-04-30 22:04|| 2013-04-30 22:04|| Front Page Top

#15 Obozo is using the passive voice here, like he is still a senator or some outside advocate or agitator, and not the man in charge. He does that when he's just pandering to his base.

A useful insight, RandomJD. :-)

Posted by trailing wife 2013-04-30 23:44|| 2013-04-30 23:44|| Front Page Top

23:56 European Conservative
23:44 trailing wife
23:37 trailing wife
23:32 trailing wife
23:15 trailing wife
22:16 JosephMendiola
22:12 JosephMendiola
22:06 JosephMendiola
22:04 European Conservative
22:02 European Conservative
21:59 European Conservative
21:57 JosephMendiola
21:56 European Conservative
21:52 chris
21:50 Barbara
21:50 Barbara
21:49 Barbara
21:48 Barbara
21:45 Barbara
21:36 ed in texas
21:12 Steve White
20:32 European Conservative
20:15 European Conservative
20:09 AlanC