Hi there, !
Today Thu 05/19/2005 Wed 05/18/2005 Tue 05/17/2005 Mon 05/16/2005 Sun 05/15/2005 Sat 05/14/2005 Fri 05/13/2005 Archives
Rantburg
533518 articles and 1861308 comments are archived on Rantburg.

Today: 76 articles and 474 comments as of 3:24.
Post a news link    Post your own article   
Area: WoT Operations    WoT Background    Opinion           
Uzbeks expel town leaders from Korasuv
Today's Headlines
Headline Comments [Views]
Page 3: Non-WoT
4 00:00 badanov [3] 
2 00:00 Anonymoose [2] 
6 00:00 mom [2] 
11 00:00 Anonymoose [7] 
6 00:00 .com [5] 
5 00:00 Mike [2] 
5 00:00 jackal [1] 
17 00:00 jackal [] 
6 00:00 Super Hose [1] 
1 00:00 .com [1] 
5 00:00 RWV [] 
3 00:00 Pappy [7] 
0 [] 
9 00:00 Super Hose [1] 
3 00:00 Raj [2] 
6 00:00 Frank G [2] 
4 00:00 Dr. Johnny Fever [] 
0 [1] 
3 00:00 Pappy [3] 
4 00:00 Frank G [] 
17 00:00 Super Hose [] 
20 00:00 trailing wife [1] 
9 00:00 jackal [1] 
0 [] 
7 00:00 .com [1] 
14 00:00 Anonymoose [] 
6 00:00 BrerRabbit [1] 
Page 1: WoT Operations
1 00:00 docob [5]
6 00:00 Shipman [1]
4 00:00 Shipman [2]
26 00:00 docob [3]
14 00:00 .com [2]
0 [3]
4 00:00 Frank G [6]
36 00:00 Super Hose [3]
8 00:00 badanov [1]
1 00:00 Liberalhawk []
16 00:00 Shipman [4]
6 00:00 john [12]
1 00:00 2b [10]
1 00:00 trailing wife [1]
2 00:00 Liberalhawk [7]
1 00:00 Mark Z. [1]
0 [2]
4 00:00 Frank G [2]
2 00:00 Tkat [2]
Page 2: WoT Background
0 [2]
4 00:00 buwaya [2]
4 00:00 jackal [1]
2 00:00 trailing wife [1]
7 00:00 Bomb-a-rama []
4 00:00 jackal [2]
25 00:00 Sherry [4]
25 00:00 Atomic Conspiracy [3]
2 00:00 jackal [1]
1 00:00 Jack is Back! []
5 00:00 john [3]
3 00:00 Hupomoque Spoluter7949 [2]
3 00:00 .com [8]
13 00:00 docob [2]
1 00:00 trailing wife [5]
5 00:00 mojo [1]
0 [1]
0 [1]
1 00:00 .com [1]
1 00:00 3dc [6]
1 00:00 Jack is Back! [1]
3 00:00 jackal [1]
27 00:00 trailing wife [6]
6 00:00 CrazyFool [1]
0 []
10 00:00 Super Hose []
6 00:00 Tkat []
4 00:00 john []
3 00:00 trailing wife [2]
Page 4: Opinion
2 00:00 Frank G []
-Short Attention Span Theater-
James Lileks on the end of Star Trek
Just the first paragraph and the last.
Hello, all you folks who've never really cared a whit for Star Trek! Goodbye. Our usual mix of petty events and tendentious observations resumes tomorrow. For now: deep into the Geek Sector. Deep. Indulge me, if you want — it's not like this is some insignificant pop culture artifact. Tote all the seasons up, and Trek ran for 28 seasons. It started with LBJ and ended half a decade into the 21st century.

Are we among friends now? Okay.
----------------snip---------------
It ended with the three ships. (Interesting how they didn't show the 1701-E, perhaps because the design wasn't really beloved; it owes too much to the Voyager-class shoehorn look, and the notch on the nacelles looks distinctly unFederation-like. And yes, I just crossed over into the land of unredeemable dorkheadedness, but I'm past caring.) I've always liked the design of the "Enterprise" Enterprise. The 1701-D looks computer generated. But the original ship, the Constitution class — that's the one that still has a hook in your heart. Maybe because it was actually real. They built a model out of wood and painted it and stuck wires in it and filmed it, and those few frames brought the whole story to life. I bought the original model kit and flew it around my bedroom. (I considered buying another and burning it to look like the one in the Doomsday Machine, too.) That was the archetype; that was what Icarus had in mind. And that was what hung in the Smithsonian that day they opened the Star Trek exhibit. All the cast showed up, except for Bones. I met them all: press tour. On the way out I found myself standing next to James Doohan under the big model of the Enterprise, floating above in the hall. I walked up next to Scotty. We looked up.

"Ah, she's a beautiful thing, isn't it?" he said.

That she was.

Posted by: Steve || 05/16/2005 8:18:11 PM || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:

#1  The older I get, the more and more Trek's Utopian PCness message irritates me. I liked the Original Trek, and it went downhill from there. Though I personally think giving the Enterprise a French Captain was the immediate death knell of the universe. Had Patrick Stewart been given a character with the temper and outlook like he played Gurney Halleck in Dune, it might have been a show worth watching. But to have the flagship of the fleet beaten down by every other race, constantly threaten to self destruct, and characters who seemed more like wooden cutouts than people, I just couldn't stand it.

Ah well, there's always Babylon 5 and Firefly.:)
Posted by: Silentbrick || 05/16/2005 23:32 Comments || Top||

#2  Still at a loss as to why they're cancelling ENTERPRISE after so short a run - DITTO for EVERYONE LOVES RAYMOND and other shows. ENTERPRISE, etal > NOT GREAT/BEST BUT NOT THE WORST EITHER. IMHO, more Networks + nanoseconds ratings > advantageous for celebrities to stay "typecast", espec iff they want to make acting their careers. Methinks the HollyLeft already know their hoped-for future USSA under Socialist OWG and prioritized deficit spending = America and the world aren't going back to the Moon for another several decades - the LeftLib agenda is good for electioneering and populist schtick, but once in power its out the window!? The HollyLeft focii is getting Hillary elected, iff only for the sake of electing a woman, ANY WOMAN, whom by chance is also a Nazi = Communist, Der Stalin/MarxPanzer "Clinton".
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 05/16/2005 23:34 Comments || Top||

#3  Please be gentle with me.

I thought Picard was the best of the Enterprise captains just because he was French.

I thought TNG came up with some very unique stories in their own unique way; TNG was the best of the Star Treks.

I know. Blasphemy in Rantburg, so, as I said, be gentle.
Posted by: Al Bundy || 05/16/2005 23:56 Comments || Top||

#4  Please be gentle with me.

I thought Picard was the best of the Enterprise captains just because he was French.

I thought TNG came up with some very unique stories in their own unique way; TNG was the best of the Star Treks.

I know. Blasphemy in Rantburg, so, as I said, be gentle.

Oopsies. Getting my cooke reestablished.
Posted by: badanov || 05/16/2005 23:57 Comments || Top||


Cannes Film Festival Puts Anti-Americanism In Focus
More Ass-hattery than usual this year despite the absence of a steaming pile of crap from Michael Mooooooore. Here's a taste:

The dark underside of the United States has taken center stage in several films at Cannes this year, capped on Monday with a scathing attack of past and present racism in America by Danish director Lars von Trier.

"Manderlay," about a fictional Alabama plantation where people are living in 1933 as if slavery were never abolished, staggered festival-goers with a disturbing portrayal of America that fails, even today, to come to terms with its racist past.

Von Trier, whose fear of flying has prevented him from visiting the United States, won thunderous cheers at the world premiere and a news conference, where he said he enjoyed bashing America on screen because it invades his life even in Denmark.

"We are all under the influence -- and it's a very bad influence -- from America," said the 49-year-old Dane. "In my country everything has to do with America. America is kind of sitting on the world.

"America has to do with 60 percent of my brain and all things I experience in my life, and I'm not happy about that," von Trier said. I'd say 60 percent of my life is American so I am in fact an 'American' too. But I can't go there and vote or change anything there. That is why I make films about America."


So let me get this straight. This Danish guy who's afraid to come to America makes a film about a FICTIONAL 1933 Alabama plantation that is supposed to provide a "staggering" portrayal of racism in America, including present day racism?! Right . . . .

I refuse to attack Denmark as a country because their government has been on the right side of the fight against Islamofascism, but dicks like this really piss me off.
Posted by: Tibor || 05/16/2005 16:51 || Comments || Link || [5 views] Top|| File under:

#1  49 yrs old. Yep, about right. Lol, if he just cried in his beer I might find him a merely pathetic and toolish creature. No, he hates himself, thus - in that peculiarly moonbat logic - it must be America's fault. It can't be that he's just a fuckwit moonbat and toolfool. No, that would never do.

I wonder if a Bush-like character was the cruel slavemaster of his epic. And Dr Rice - was she his plaything? This guy will be an instant celeb in LLL GoofyWorld.

Sigh. It won't be a minute too soon when my generation finally fucking dies off and the output of moonbat misanthropy drops back to a trickle. The kids seem to be weathering this teacup tempest of self-flagellation remarkably well - in America, anyway. It's us. We gotta go.
Posted by: .com || 05/16/2005 20:09 Comments || Top||

#2  His work might not be slanted enough to win the palm. Next year he should try to compare Bush to Hitler more. Its a little formulaic but if he's shooting for pay-dirt, boy-meets-girl just won't cut it.
Posted by: Super Hose || 05/16/2005 20:15 Comments || Top||

#3  Manderlay? Somebody's got his literature confused:

Last night I dreamed I went to Manderlay again...

On the road to Manderlay
Where the flyin' moonbats play
And the dawn comes up like blunder
Outer Napoule, 'cross the Bay


'Less he means Mandingo.
Posted by: Angie Schultz || 05/16/2005 22:22 Comments || Top||

#4  Oh no! Not another filmmaker! How much criticism must we take?! How many 'artistic' statements, negative portrayals and renderings from pretentious European directors can Americans withstand?!

I thought that we would never survive the wrath of Wim Wenders and Roland Emmerich. And then when Ken Loach and Pedro Almodovar started bad mouthing the U.S., it was all I could do not to burst into tears. But with Lars Von Trier launching his sequel to Dogville, I think us Neo-Cons need to throw in the towel.

The U.S. must repent. Lars has shown us the error of our ways.
Posted by: John in Tokyo || 05/16/2005 23:23 Comments || Top||

#5  ROFL! *bravo*
Posted by: .com || 05/16/2005 23:34 Comments || Top||

#6  BTW, I finally saw Emmerich's Emetic Epic last night (The Day After Tomorrow for those who've forgotten his "credits") and it was a howler, lol! Amazing. I'm sure Maurice Strong got a good laugh from it.
Posted by: .com || 05/16/2005 23:40 Comments || Top||


Lion Mutilates 42 Midgets
Spectators cheered as entire Cambodian Midget Fighting League squared off against African Lion.

Tickets had been sold-out three weeks before the much anticipated fight, which took place in the city of Kâmpóng Chhn'ng. The fight was slated when an angry fan contested Yang Sihamoni, President of the CMFL, claiming that one lion could defeat his entire league of 42 fighters.

Sihamoni takes great pride in the league he helped create, as was conveyed in his recent advertising campaign for the CMFL that stated his midgets will "... take on anything; man, beast, or machine." This campaign is believed to be what sparked the undisclosed fan to challenge the entire league to fight a lion; a challenge that Sihamoni readily accepted.

An African Lion (Panthera Leo) was shipped to centrally located Kâmpóng Chhn'ng especially for the event, which took place last Saturday, April 30, 2005 in the city's coliseum. The Cambodian Government allowed the fight to take place, under the condition that they receive a 50% commission on each ticket sold, and that no cameras would be allowed in the arena.

The fight was called in only 12 minutes, after which 28 fighters were declared dead, while the other 14 suffered severe injuries including broken bones and lost limbs, rendering them unable to fight back.

Sihamoni was quoted before the fight stating that he felt since his fighters out-numbered the lion 42 to 1, that they "
 could out-wit and out-muscle [it]." Unfortunately, he was wrong.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins || 05/16/2005 15:06 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I thought gladitorial games died out with the Romans. Guess I'm a little short of facts....
Posted by: mmurray821 || 05/16/2005 15:16 Comments || Top||

#2  Sounds like a historical reenactment of Pol Pot's boys against the Vietnamese to me. Festive ratflesh satay with dipping sauce or fruit salsa would be appropriate food for watching the fast paced and largely pathetic event.
Posted by: Iron Chef Kenichi || 05/16/2005 15:46 Comments || Top||

#3  Sounds like a send up of some sort.
Posted by: Shipman || 05/16/2005 15:47 Comments || Top||

#4  Lion(s) - why did he eat do they hate midgets?
Posted by: Raj || 05/16/2005 15:47 Comments || Top||

#5  lol. Nice one though they didn't quite capture the tone of BBC writing style.
Posted by: Tkat || 05/16/2005 15:53 Comments || Top||

#6  After reading this, I have to ask myself, am I having acid flashbacks?
Posted by: tu3031 || 05/16/2005 15:55 Comments || Top||

#7  The err... meat of the story is that the Cambodian Midget Fighting League is pretty much out of business. I'm gonna miss them on pay-per-view.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins || 05/16/2005 15:57 Comments || Top||

#8  So where does PETA stand in all this?
Posted by: CrazyFool || 05/16/2005 15:58 Comments || Top||

#9  This was a good ha-ha from a week or two ago, but while they were at it, they should have used the BBC letterhead to better advantage with fake headlines like: "BBC Admits War In Iraq Was A Good War -- Issues Apology For Repeatedly Deceiving Public With Biased Reporting"; "BBC Poll: Bush Is Great President"; "EU Constitution An Elitist, Bureaucratic Sham"; "British Public Still Openly Despise French, Germans, Wogs, And With Good Reason".
Posted by: Anonymoose || 05/16/2005 16:07 Comments || Top||

#10  They apparently love midgets, but the repast was interrupted.

Two questions:
Did Sihamoni survive?
What was the Govt "take"?

I thought I'd heard / seen it all after running into the snake blood guys in Bangkok, see a bona-fide dog-pit match in Bosier City, the Toul Sleng Genocide museum's Skull map in Phnom Penh, and seeing the cobra routine in Bombay - Goa, actually. How naive of me.
Posted by: .com || 05/16/2005 16:09 Comments || Top||

#11  If you go to the article, it appears to be a BBC story. However, if you click "printable version" you are sent to a disclaimer page where the prankster confesses he created the fake page to win a bet with a friend.
Posted by: RWV || 05/16/2005 16:12 Comments || Top||

#12  Phony? Gee, y'think?
Posted by: mojo || 05/16/2005 16:12 Comments || Top||

#13  RWV: The NYT should have that feature, too.
Posted by: Anonymoose || 05/16/2005 16:59 Comments || Top||

#14  Next, you're gonna tell me that the midgets were Christians. Is this story for real or did Isikoff write this one too?
Posted by: GK || 05/16/2005 18:11 Comments || Top||

#15  should've fought a Lion Of Islam™. Midgets would've skinned em
Posted by: Frank G || 05/16/2005 19:03 Comments || Top||

#16  Would anyone be surprised to find that Don King owns the PPV rights?
Posted by: Super Hose || 05/16/2005 21:41 Comments || Top||

#17  So, who will run with this first? CBS or Newsweek?
Posted by: jackal || 05/16/2005 22:46 Comments || Top||


'Alcohol worse for female brains'
Posted by: tipper || 05/16/2005 10:57 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Worlds Largest Fish Is Shrinking
The world's largest fish, the gentle and solitary whale shark, is getting smaller, an international conference heard this week.
"We dunno what's goin' on. We gave it polio vaccine. First its doinker shrunk down to winkie size. Now the rest of it's doing the same thing!"
This has led to concerns that the future of this highly migratory fish may be threatened. Whale sharks live in tropical waters around the world and are sometimes spotted in protected waters at Ningaloo Reef in Western Australia. Dr Mark Meekan and colleagues from the Australian Institute of Marine Science studied continuous records from log books filled out by ecotourist operators operating at Ningaloo Reef. Meekan told the International Whale Shark Conference in Perth this week that the average size of the fish had declined, from just over 7 metres in 1995 to around 5.5 metres today.

Researchers don't know exactly why the fish is shrinking. But they speculate that over-fishing in unprotected international waters, injuries caused by collisions with sea vessels and a drop in the average age of the fish could be reasons. "Any fish population that is undergoing unsustainable mortality usually shows a drop in average size of individual fish, and a drop in abundance. So what we're seeing at Ningaloo is particularly worrying, because these waters are protected," says Meekan. "If we're losing the adults in the population, leaving only juvenile whale sharks, then we'll have no population there to reproduce. That's a real concern."

The whale shark is an elusive, slow growing, plankton-eating, oceanic fish. It only occasionally ventures to a handful of coastlines around the world, including those along India, the Seychelles, Kenya and Somalia. Because of this very little is known about them. Only one pregnant female has ever been found and she had a litter of 300 pups. Meekan says 'top order' animals such as large sharks are a good barometer of the ocean health. "They're like the canary in the coal mine, so we do need to pay attention to the signals they are giving us."

Protecting the whale shark
Conference delegates called for countries to try harder to protect the whale shark and its habitat. They called for a move away from harvesting the sharks to sustainable alternatives, like carefully managed ecotourism. "The evidence points to serious declines in the abundance of whale sharks in some parts of the world following even short periods of exloitation," the delegates say in a communiqué released at the end of the conference.
Remind me to put a "Save the Sharks" sticker on my Volvo tomorrow.

First, I gotta buy a Volvo...
Posted by: Spavirt Pheng6042 || 05/16/2005 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  "Mark Meekan and colleagues from the Australian Institute of Marine Science studied continuous records from log books filled out by ecotourist operators operating at Ningaloo Reef."


A fine example of rigorous metholodgy for grant
money.



then again, did I ever tell you about the time in Colorado '57, when a beaver mugged me and took my golden trout?
Posted by: Ebbeque Ebbairong7947 || 05/16/2005 1:49 Comments || Top||

#2  Maybe Mother Nature decided that smaller is better when it comes to being a whale shark and natural selection is at work?
Posted by: Steve || 05/16/2005 8:23 Comments || Top||

#3  Maybe the water is getting colder.
Posted by: Miss Gunn || 05/16/2005 9:27 Comments || Top||

#4  I blame the South Beach diet and Vogue magazine.
Posted by: ed || 05/16/2005 9:30 Comments || Top||

#5  "if only W had signed Kyoto"
Posted by: Frank G || 05/16/2005 10:05 Comments || Top||

#6  ..when a beaver mugged me and took my golden trout?

Golden trout in CO? A transplant maybe?
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 05/16/2005 10:48 Comments || Top||

#7  Ningaloo is the last undeveloped warm water coast line in the world. Ten years ago I paddled a canoe up most of its length. There was not a single inhabited building along the entire coast (there is an abandoned whaling station) and I doubt it has changed. Forget about the Great Barrier Reef, Ningaloo is far more impressive. I realize migratory animals are at risk when they leave protected areas but if anywhere is secure for these animals Nigaloo is.
Posted by: phil_b || 05/16/2005 10:48 Comments || Top||

#8  I blame Bush and his warmongering, imperialistic policies. Plus, he's a Christian, and everyone knows God punished the whale that ate Jonah Goldberg. . . . Huh? It's a Whale SHARK? Um . . . never mind.
Posted by: Tibor || 05/16/2005 11:52 Comments || Top||

#9  The world's largest fish, the gentle and solitary whale shark, is getting smaller, an international conference heard this week.

Barry Bonds and Jason Giambi are looking smaller now too; I think it's the steroid testing policy...
Posted by: Raj || 05/16/2005 11:57 Comments || Top||

#10  Speaking of polio vaccines, I think Michael Moore is due for a booster shot soon...
Posted by: Seafarious || 05/16/2005 12:26 Comments || Top||

#11  Whatever it is, something fishy is going on, that's for sure.
Posted by: Mike || 05/16/2005 13:12 Comments || Top||

#12  Too many Koran flushed out to sea, you see.
Posted by: john || 05/16/2005 13:48 Comments || Top||

#13  Wimps.
Where ya been Hose Man?
Posted by: Shamu || 05/16/2005 19:33 Comments || Top||

#14  My wife and I were blessed with another daughter. I have been burping. :-)
Posted by: Super Hose || 05/16/2005 20:06 Comments || Top||

#15  Congrats!

(I wondered if that Shamu thingy would generate a response, lol - you know it's Ship, right? He wears so many hats, heh.)
Posted by: .com || 05/16/2005 20:14 Comments || Top||

#16  Ship has always remembered my original hose story that featured my fellow Sea World employee, Shamu.
Posted by: Super Hose || 05/16/2005 20:21 Comments || Top||

#17  W00t! Super Hose is ba-a-a-ck! Congrats on your new daughter. You named her Fredwina, right?
Posted by: Seafarious || 05/16/2005 20:48 Comments || Top||

#18  Natalie, actually.

With regard to the shrinking whale shark, it should try using its nose to flip a beach ball through an oversized baskeball hoop. Always good for a protein snack from the adoring public. Alternately swimming on its side with one fin out of the water in a pseudo wave is another excellent way to solicit a meal.
Posted by: Super Hose || 05/16/2005 21:19 Comments || Top||

#19  Does whale shark meat make good sushi? How much Japanese "research" has involved bits of recently deceased whale shark?
Posted by: trailing wife || 05/16/2005 23:59 Comments || Top||

#20  BTW, congratulations on acquiring a Natalie! Girl children can be highly amusing as they grow up, and their fathers even more so (I just discovered today that Mr. Wife's first rule of dating is that his daughters may not do so until they earn a black belt -- which occurred last December. None of the XX members of his household were informed about this... and fortunately he didn't hold me to the same rule back when we were young!).

I wish y'all ever increasing joy as your little one (and any siblings) grows up, and hope only enough sorrow comes your way that is needed -- like salt -- to make your joys sweeter.
Posted by: trailing wife || 05/17/2005 0:06 Comments || Top||


Caribbean-Latin America
Venezuela's Oil Output May Be Below Estimates
Venezuela's oil output, suspect since the strike that shut down the world's fifth-largest exporter more than two years ago, may be more than 200,000 barrels per day lower than analysts' estimates. Oil workers in the country's oldest producing region say they know why. Poor maintenance, labor unrest and corrupt management are crippling state-run Petroleos de Venezuela SA, said Carlos Carreno, a mechanic whose contract ran out April 30. He spoke in a crowd of several hundred workers earlier this month outside the main gate of the oil terminal on Lake Maracaibo where they used to work, as National Guard troops kept watch. The workers, among those hired after the strike to help restore production, are part of a growing chorus of critics of Caracas-based Petroleos de Venezuela. President Hugo Chavez himself said May 3 there have been ``management errors'' at South America's largest oil company.
"Yasss... Mistakes were made. It's time to move on..."
``What's happening to Petroleos de Venezuela is truly deplorable,'' Jose Toro Hardy, a Caracas oil analyst and former board member, said in a May 11 telephone interview. ``Petroleos de Venezuela is on the verge of collapse.''
That reinforces my contention that the best way to screw something up is to put the gummint in charge of it...
Less oil from Venezuela, the third-largest producer in the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, may deepen concern supplies won't meet global needs later this year, when demand peaks as refiners make winter heating fuels. The lack of excess capacity pushed oil to a record $58.28 a barrel in New York on April 4. Venezuela's output has fallen to about 2.3 million barrels per day, said Deputy Julio Montoya, an opposition member on the assembly's energy commission, citing a new study by the commission. By comparison, the U.S. Energy Department said May 10 that April output was 2.5 million barrels. ``We have a little problem and we are fixing it,'' Chavez, 50, said in a May 3 speech in Caracas.
"Houston, we have a problem!"
He cited mismanagement at the state oil company, which is run by one of his closest aides, Energy Minister Rafael Ramirez.
What do you want to bet the solution to the little problem doesn't involve shooting Rafael?
Chavez said the next day that the country's output is 3.1 million barrels a day, higher than any estimates from analysts or agencies outside the Venezuelan government. At the other extreme, union leader Luis Ortega said the country's output has fallen to 2.1 million barrels. Ortega heads Fedepetrol, the country's largest oil union, in Maracaibo, the heart of the country's western oil region. Ramirez, 41, didn't respond to requests for an interview for this article.
"Article? Pfui. Go bother someone less important than I!"
About half of the country's oil is produced by Petroleos de Venezuela. The rest is pumped by foreign companies, such as San Ramon, California-based Chevron Corp. and Paris-based Total SA, or by joint ventures the international oil companies control. These haven't been affected by the recent turmoil. Petroleos de Venezuela fired more than half of its workforce to break the strike, which was aimed at ousting Chavez, after the country's oil output was cut to less than 100,000 barrels a day in December 2002 and January 2003. Afterwards, the company hired workers loyal to Chavez. Carreno and Luis Martins, also in the crowd outside the oil terminal, said they remain loyal to Chavez while growing disillusioned with the company.
"If the tsar only knew!"
More than 8,000 contract workers have been let go by the company so far this year. Carreno and Martins, who worked for Constructores Electricos Y Industriales CA, said they were trying to get their jobs back or collect severance they were promised. ``We're all backers of the president, we're all Chavistas,'' Martins said in an interview May 6. ``But Ramirez and the board aren't letting the president know what's really happening here.''
Posted by: Fred || 05/16/2005 10:35 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1 
That reinforces my contention that the best way to screw something up is to put the gummint in charge of it...

And when the government is headed by a bona fide Commie, that would tend to make it worse...
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 05/16/2005 10:52 Comments || Top||

#2  But Ramirez and the board aren't letting the president know what's really happening here.

Of course not, that is a real good way to get shot.
Posted by: mmurray821 || 05/16/2005 11:01 Comments || Top||

#3  Well, 21st century socialism at work, that's what Hugo's forming, socialism for the 21st century.
Posted by: anonymous2u || 05/16/2005 11:07 Comments || Top||

#4 
``We're all backers of the president, we're all Chavistas,'' Martins said in an interview May 6. ``But Ramirez and the board aren't letting the president know what's really happening here.''


Of course, they pretty much have to profess loyalty to Chavez and blame everything on a corrupt underling keeping the truth from the Tsar. Do otherwise and you might not have a job tomorrow.
Posted by: The Faceless Horror From Beyond Time and Space and New Jersey || 05/16/2005 11:36 Comments || Top||

#5  Venezuela is a paranoid thugocracy. Be nice to the Dear Leader at all times. Do otherwise and you might not have your head tomorrow.
Posted by: Mike || 05/16/2005 13:50 Comments || Top||

#6  Part of the problem is that even bankrupt thugs can stay in power if they are ruthless enough. Robert Mugabe. QED
Posted by: RWV || 05/16/2005 16:41 Comments || Top||

#7  RWV - Heh, you said QED. Now you're in for it. ;-)
Posted by: .com || 05/16/2005 17:48 Comments || Top||

#8  Quick Enough Delegator?
Posted by: Shipman || 05/16/2005 19:34 Comments || Top||

#9  Hugo's malfeasance is not limited to damaging a pliiar of Venezuela's national economy. You would think that the Greens would care more about the enviromental damage that his boys are causing to several pretty delicate eco-systems. (I bet he can get away with mass graves as well.) Hugo gets some flack for stiffling the press but little issaid when he jams through legislation that reroutes PDVSA revenue into his own slush fund vice the general fund of the legislature. Not even Putin gets away with that type of move.
Posted by: Super Hose || 05/16/2005 20:37 Comments || Top||


China-Japan-Koreas
Air Force officer charged with shakedowns
OSAN AIR FORCE BASE, South Korea, May 15 (UPI) -- A U.S. Air Force officer has been charged with shaking down the owners of bars, clubs and other businesses outside a base in South Korea. First Lt. Jason Davis of the 51st Security Forces Squadron faces a long list of charges, Stars and Stripes reported Sunday. They include bribery, extortion, rape, assault, larceny, adultery and official misconduct.
That'll look real nice on his performance report. On the other hand, he's the front runner for the Democratic Senate seat from Massachusetts.
He has been in custody at Camp Humphreys since March 1, the military newspaper said.
Davis headed a unit responsible for patrolling the neighborhood near Osan Air Force Base where off-base establishments were centered.
Security Forces: aka Sky Cops
He allegedly demanded bribes or sexual favors from owners after threatening to post them off-limits to U.S. military personnel. "If your club is tagged 'off limits' it's like a death sentence," one owner told the newspaper Joong Ang in a story on a March 29 demonstration by angry business owners. Davis also faces charges in South Korea of keeping a firearm at an off-base residence.
Too bad LT, the next person who says "Me love you long time" will be your cell mate, Bruno.
Posted by: Steve || 05/16/2005 9:48:28 AM || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I thought it was just rumurs! The cops used to brag about having the entire city wired, but this was back in the 1980s. If true I bet you'll see a bunch of other former SPs testifying.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge || 05/16/2005 10:18 Comments || Top||

#2  That's "First Lt. Dumbshit" to you!
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut || 05/16/2005 11:32 Comments || Top||

#3  Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery...
Posted by: Raj || 05/16/2005 12:02 Comments || Top||


Europe
France: Delusions of Grandeur
Chirac clearly has a distorted view of France's place in the world, based on filtered historical reference and a distorted understanding of how France is perceived today in the world. Arrogance blinds.

May 23 issue - Deep in rural France, the ancient village of Sarran (population: 300) boasts a strange museum. It's a 4 million euro building, constructed at the expense of today's French and European taxpayers, and very modern, to be sure. But its spirit harks back to the cabinets de curiosite of the 18th century, in which the great dilettantes of the French Enlightenment accumulated vast eccentric collections that often revealed the hidden corners of their minds. Sarran's cabinet is all about French President Jacques Chirac, who traces his family roots and his political origins to this region of Correze.

One of the most notable bits of inventory is the sumo-wrestling collection: figurines, posters, a belt and other tokens of that martial art for light-footed behemoths. To explain his passion for sumo, Chirac once cited a description of the sport as less about contact than contemplating the adversary: when the big moves finally come, the action is so fast that "victory is achieved before we've had the time to know how." Several of Chirac's political rivals have felt that way over the years. "Maybe if I'd started young, I could have done sumo," the 6-foot-3 French president once mused in an interview with the sports newspaper l'Equipe. "I had the necessary height. And the weight? That can be put on."
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: planet dan || 05/16/2005 3:59:00 PM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I'm thinking a better title might be "Delusions of Adequacy"...
Posted by: Fester Chebordinek || 05/16/2005 16:07 Comments || Top||

#2  Uncle Fester,

How true...Chirac has hit rock bottom and started to dig!
Posted by: Warthog || 05/16/2005 17:33 Comments || Top||

#3  They could've just stopped at "Delusions" - and let it go at that.
Posted by: .com || 05/16/2005 17:36 Comments || Top||

#4  In the Balkans, he pushed President Bill Clinton to intervene militarily, break the Serbian stranglehold on Bosnia and finally end the genocidal war.

He pushed Bill Clinton??? Bill, Clinton, the Paragon of Resolve? Wow...wotta man! Just like the French, they're always there when they need us.

That's it. I've officially lost all respect I've ever had for France.

'Cept for Foch: "My right flank is giving way, my center cannot hold. Position excellent. We will attack."
Posted by: Darth VAda || 05/16/2005 21:40 Comments || Top||

#5  And Bir Hachim and Monte Cassino. The French (and Italians) can be as brave as anyone. They just have lousy governments (Italy in WWII, France ... well ... always).
Posted by: jackal || 05/16/2005 22:51 Comments || Top||


French EU referendum polls put 'non' camp ahead at 54%
With just over two weeks to go before the French cast their ballots in a referendum on the EU constitution, a poll gave 54 per cent to the 'no' camp on Saturday, while one a day earlier had 'yes' ahead at 52 per cent. In one survey carried out for the Wanadoo Internet provider, 54 per cent of those who had made up their minds said they would vote yes while 46 per cent said no. Twelve per cent were undecided in the survey of 858 people by telephone. On Friday a TNS-Sofres/Unilog poll for Le Monde newspaper, radio station RTL and TV news channel LCI indicated that 52 per cent of French voters intended to ratify the treaty and that 48 per cent were against it, but 29 per cent of those surveyed said they may still change their minds ahead of the May 28 vote. Two other polls carried out this week suggested the running was neck-and-neck with one offering a 50-50 result and the other giving 51 per cent to the yes camp. French polls do not publish a margin of error.
Posted by: Fred || 05/16/2005 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  LeMonde is Le Chirac's private mouthpiece. Any poll they took is by definition crooked like Chirac.
Posted by: 3dc || 05/16/2005 0:18 Comments || Top||

#2  Will there be UN observers?
Posted by: someone || 05/16/2005 1:38 Comments || Top||

#3  Nope. Le Monde is not Chirac's private mouthpiece. It has ever been critical of him. In fact most of its journalists hate him. In am mock vote before the 2002 French presidential elections 50 % of its journalists voted for one of the two trotskits candidates (ie more radical then the communists). However Le Monde's party line has ever been strongly pro-EU and Le Monde has consitently tried to manipulate the opinion toward pro-UE feelings (diabolization of the USA, torpedoing of any politician critical of the EU, distortion ofb the news when they reflected poorly of the EU).

Le Monde has enormous influence on the French media resulting in politicians molding their positions to please Le Monde. Americans, ever think in an independent press as non-state owned but in France what we lack is notr apress independent of the state but a state independent of the press: the lack of counterweights to Le Monde and its ilk has politicians trying to please Le Monde more than to please the elector.
Posted by: JFM || 05/16/2005 2:24 Comments || Top||

#4  Thanks, JFM, good post, wish you had a voice in the US media.
Posted by: anon and want to stay that way || 05/16/2005 2:47 Comments || Top||

#5 
Posted by: JFM || 05/16/2005 5:29 Comments || Top||

#6  In 2000, the then prime Minister Lionel Jospin didn't hesitate to alienate its own electoral base, ruffle feathers in the socialist party, lose a crucial ally (the one who gave him credibility about fighting crime, an important concern of the electorate), and betray his own ideas in order to get "Le Monde"'s support for the presidential campaign.

End result was that trhe crucial ally ran against him and deprived Jospin of enough votes for Jospin coming behind Le Pen and thus not being in the second round of the Presidential election. He retired, sort of, from politics but had he had some sense of honor he would have written a poem, drunk a cup of sake and performed sepuku. I would gladly have helped him with the poem. :-)

Anyway that story is a proime example of the French state bowing to the wbhims of the French MSM. In many ways France's problem is the state not being independent of the press.
Posted by: JFM || 05/16/2005 5:40 Comments || Top||

#7  JFM

Can't wait for France to have a Le Renard TV station.
Posted by: mhw || 05/16/2005 7:51 Comments || Top||

#8  Btw, Fox News was shown on sat tv, by the two main broadcasters; I used to frequently watch it, found it very lively and interesting.
Alas, some time before OIF, first "Canalsat", the offspring of the *left-leaning* "Canal+", ceased its broadcasting, followed a bit later by its rival "Tps". Now, FN, which is demonized as the "evil neo-con/Bushitleretardedictator's channel, isn't available anymore... but, of course, "Al Jezzera", "Al arabya" and co are... I've written to FN, and they kindly responded, saying that presently no french distributor was interested in rebroadcasting it. Draw your own conclusions.
Posted by: Anonymous5089 || 05/16/2005 8:12 Comments || Top||

#9  I read Le Monde on-line now and then and if I could write as well as JFM I would have said exactly the same thing.
Posted by: SwissTex || 05/16/2005 9:09 Comments || Top||

#10  Le Monde is the statist pro-EU newspaper in France; In short the Socialist Pro-EU wing. Le Figaro is the right newspaper pro-EU too, lightly pro-Chirac since the Franch right is only glued because Chirac is in power. Chirac/Sarkozy is the what devides the right.
Posted by: Hupomoque Spoluter7949 || 05/16/2005 11:24 Comments || Top||

#11  From the three French papers who matter (there are more outside Paris, but they mostly report about who won the beauty contest in Trou Perdu and have about zero national or international politics coverage, at best they relay AFP) "Le Figaro" is the only one who has some europsceptical or american-friendly articles. Don't dream they are not the majority, but at least, unlike the other two "Le Figaro" is not monolithically pro-EU and anti-american. Jean François Revel (PBUH) :-) wrote in Le Figaro until recently.
Posted by: JFM || 05/16/2005 11:52 Comments || Top||

#12  [Jospin] retired, sort of, from politics but had he had some sense of honor he would have written a poem, drunk a cup of sake and performed sepuku. I would gladly have helped him with the poem.

So . . . I take it you don't like this guy, eh?
Posted by: Mike || 05/16/2005 12:33 Comments || Top||

#13  I seem to remember reading that last time they had a tight vote on a major EU issue, the government just stuffed the ballot boxes with phony votes from Tahiti, Moorea, French Guyana, and a bunch of other former colonial possessions whose citizens are apparently still allowed to vote in French elections. It wouldn't surprise me if Chirac did the same thing again.
Posted by: Captain Pedantic || 05/16/2005 13:02 Comments || Top||

#14  Mike

On the contrary I love him so much that I would have helped him with the poem, paid the sake from my own pocket and then given him the coup de grace to avoid him suffering. :-)
Posted by: JFM || 05/16/2005 15:17 Comments || Top||

#15  Captain Pedantic:

Technically Guyanne, Martinique and Guadeloupe are full French "departements" like any others and their citizens fully fledged French citizens (ie like Hawains and Alaskans but unlike Puerto Ricans) so they have the right to vote.

However, those territories are very dependant on subsidies from the French tax payer and have banana Republic-like levels of clientelism. Their massive voting in favor of the Maastricht treaty was decisive in its adoption.

Another vote who massively voted for Maastricht was Alsace. It is there where the EU parliament is located. Since two times a month the parliament travels between Brussels and Strasbourg at enormous cost for the tax payer and inconvenience for the euro-deputies, the plan was to move the Parliament to Brussels. But when the "No" looked like it could win the plan was shelved. Since the Parliament means jobs and money for the region, Alsacians voted for Maastricht at over 70%, and still more for the Bas-Rhin (ie the department whose capital is Strasbourg).

As you see, the pro-EU people have a very peculiar respect for democracy and cleanness of elections.

Posted by: JFM || 05/16/2005 17:03 Comments || Top||

#16  Maybe Fred could put up a 'Non' and 'Oui' pool, so that we can place bets. Nearest guess wins. Quatloos only, want to keep it legal. I'll be the first to stick my neck out and say 'Non' by 54.5% for 10 Quatloos. Any takers?
Posted by: Anonymoose || 05/16/2005 17:04 Comments || Top||

#17  JFM, in the end the vote is in the tank, isn't it? At the last minute won't someone just yell, "hate Bush," and 90% of the French will approve the constitution?
Posted by: Super Hose || 05/16/2005 21:09 Comments || Top||


Home Front: Politix
National Parks Director Says "Whole Parks" May Be Outsourced
The National Park Service is now considering contracting out the entire operations of three national parks, according to a memo from NPS Director Fran Mainella released today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). Previously, the National Park Service looked to outsource certain types of jobs, such as maintenance, among several parks but is now looking at park units in their entirety for future bids by private firms.
The three parks under review are Boston National Historical Park, San Juan Island National Historic Site (in Washington state) and the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. Altogether, these three parks employ 312 NPS employees on a full-time basis.
In an April 15, 2005 memo, NPS Director Fran Mainella cited these three parks as the subject of "preliminary [competitive sourcing] planning efforts for FY 2005. We will be reviewing whole parks to achieve the most efficient operations possible."
"We have now reached the point where Disney or Bally's Resorts can bid on entire national park operations with almost no public debate on whether that is appropriate," stated PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch. "Why stop at individual parks, why not auction off the whole national park system to the lowest bidder?"
Citing cost overruns and potential side effects, Congress severely restricted the Bush Administration efforts to outsource National Park Service and U.S. Forest Service jobs during the 2004 fiscal year. Those restrictions, however, lapsed this past October and now the Bush Administration is again pushing its "Competitive Sourcing" initiative.
In her memo, Director Mainella indicated that NPS reviewed only 588 jobs in the past three years, fewer than 200 a year. In 2002 and 2003, no government workers were replaced. In 2004, an unspecified number of NPS employees were displaced but given early retirements or buy-outs. The only identified savings from these exercises totaled $2 million but this figure does not account for what it cost to stage the reviews nor the roughly $5 million NPS paid a private consultant to advise it on the review process.
"It is widely acknowledged that contract management is not the strong suit of federal agencies yet the Competitive Sourcing strategy seeks to promote precisely what government seems to do worst," added Ruch. "The Bush outsourcing program in the Park Service has been a major disruption, a morale killer and a waste of funds that has benefited only the consultants who dispense expensive advice on the taxpayers' dime."
Here's a better idea: Why not give the land the federals stole from the States back to them? Keep the top 20 National parks, but give the 90% of Alaska back to the Alaskans. The federal government doesn't use the land, can't afford to manage it, but tries to use it to make money, which is *exactly* what the States who *should* own it would try to do.
Posted by: Anonymoose || 05/16/2005 17:45 || Comments || Link || [7 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I'll bet that the government could get illegal immigrants to run the parks for a fraction of what we pay the National Park Service.
Posted by: DMFD || 05/16/2005 18:26 Comments || Top||

#2  Sheesh, Moose - are you terminal?
Posted by: .com || 05/16/2005 18:36 Comments || Top||

#3  Aren't we all. It's the irony and the extasy don't you know.
Posted by: Spemble Shipman || 05/16/2005 19:40 Comments || Top||

#4  Sheesh, he puts on his Spemble hat and goes all Yoda on us!
Posted by: .com || 05/16/2005 19:49 Comments || Top||

#5  .com: In my State alone, since I was a kid, I have seen all the great places I used to visit for free grabbed by the feds, had a parking lot put in, and now you're not only charged for parking, but have to pay admission. And not just big stuff, but things like popular swimming creeks and caves, and huge areas that are now basically off-limits to most recreational use. These are not just really special, nice places, but damn near 1/3rd of my State. Where do they get off, thinking that they can land grab all of this and tell the local people they can't use it without a federal permit? "The Federal Government owns nearly 650 million acres of land - almost 30 percent of the land area of the United States. Federally-owned and managed public lands include National Parks, National Forests, and National Wildlife Refuges." Do you honestly believe that the federal government needs more than a fraction of this State land?
Posted by: Anonymoose || 05/16/2005 21:00 Comments || Top||

#6  yeah, moose, sometimes it's the best way to prevent loss of the resource. You should know, as an engineer directly impacted by enviro constraints...sometimes, I actually agree with the purpose, if not the methods
Posted by: Frank G || 05/16/2005 21:27 Comments || Top||

#7  I would wager that those who used to maintain the places you're referring to asked for the Feds to maintain it - and the State Leg had to approve it. In other words, it was about money.

When each state was admitted to the Union the areas that were State lands and those that were Federal lands were clearly delineated. Utah, for example, is predominantly Federal land - as was agreed to when they joined. Texas kept almost ALL of the non-private land - they even own the coastlands and the off-shore rights to minerals, a unique condition. There is very little Federal land in Texas. Proposals for Military installations are happily negotiated, since they bring jobs and commerce. But it does not happen without the approval of the State Govt.

For land to become Federally managed (not sure if it is actually Federal land but perhaps that's academic, after the fact) after the state joined the Union, it is an act of the State Legislature that makes it so. The Federal Govt doesn't just run around gobbling up land. There is a measure, I think, dealing with Eminent Domain on the Federal level, but you'd have to get one of our legal beagles to address that - it sure doesn't happen without hearings and courts and such if it involves privately held land. I'm starting to think you're coming unglued.
Posted by: .com || 05/16/2005 21:28 Comments || Top||

#8  I'll grant you the pre-existing ownership angle, .com, but there's no reason for them to keep it all. In particular, the choke holds on certain cities really have to go.

Remember the Homestead Act? The feds gave the land away for people to have their own place. I'm not saying that we need a bunch of farmers in the Sonoran Desert, but the federal government doesn't need all that land and it mis-uses it greatly. Note the huge fires are always on federal (or state sometimes, granted) forests, not private land for the most part.
Posted by: jackal || 05/16/2005 22:58 Comments || Top||

#9  .com: you may feel I may be coming "unglued", but in no uncertain terms, you *are* downright rude. Please don't act like a liberal and use personal attack to justify your arguments in the future, it makes you sound deficient. On topic, let me provide you a similar argument that was written as an editorial in the Washington Times on March 8th. "Freeing up federal lands", by Representative Chris Cannon, Utah Republican, who is chairman of the Congressional Western Caucus. Hardly someone who I would call "unglued" or "terminal". Many people in the western States, myself included would agree with him, and more, in petitioning for the return of what is our property from this ill-advised federal "taking".
Posted by: Anonymoose || 05/16/2005 23:07 Comments || Top||

#10  The "unglued" reference is to the degree of Libertarian "ideals" you've begun to espouse recently. It reminds me why I never attended more than one Libertarian meeting. My comment was very fucking mild. I didn't use it to justify anything - it was an observation at the very end. Get over it, I don't tiptoe around anything for anybody.

What you're referring to is not "taking" - that's bullshit - it was designated Federal when they joined the Union. Period. You, and jackal, want them to give it back. Fair enough, contact your State Legislature and make your feelings known - and hold them accountable for the success or failure of doing so.

Look, you posted something erroneous - the seizure of State or private lands by the Feds - it has been Federal land since your state joined up. I corrected you, that's it. Now you've repeated the error again at the end of this last post. Can't you understand English?

I'm not for or against the issue of Federal or Federally managed land. I merely corrected an error - that today, now, at this moment, the Evil Federal Government is "taking" or "gobbling" up land. It's stupid on its face.
Posted by: .com || 05/16/2005 23:30 Comments || Top||

#11  .com: You are wrong. Everything West of the Louisiana Purchase were Territorial-owned lands until Statehood. The great federal land grabs didn't even begin until Teddy Roosevelt, with the 1906 Antiquities Act, which meant only Oklahoma, Arizona, Alaska and Hawaii could have agreed to surrender their lands on becoming States. Teddy, for his part, only took some of the crown jewels of the western US. But since that time, there has been a general spree of acquisitions of State lands, which culminated in the Clinton administration snatching huge tracts of land.

For your reference, the Antiquities Act. You'll note that it only mentions paying for private, not State, lands. http://www.cr.nps.gov/

In future, please reserve your rudeness for other posters. You have made it abundantly clear where you stand in several ways.
Posted by: Anonymoose || 05/17/2005 0:01 Comments || Top||


That speck in your brother's eye
Posted by: tipper || 05/16/2005 11:22 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Heh, that's no speck, that's a California Redwood. And, to make matters worse, lol, he ain't heavy, he's a lightweight loser. I've disowned the blind little peckerwood.
Posted by: .com || 05/16/2005 19:56 Comments || Top||


Dem Groups Seek Personal Financial Records of Judges
Posted by: Frank G || 05/16/2005 09:43 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Judges ought to seek personal financial records of Dem Groups.
Posted by: Alaska Paul || 05/16/2005 10:17 Comments || Top||

#2  Hell, AP, I'd settle for the financial records of Kerry (and the Mrs.) and Kennedy.

ALL of them.

Published on the Internet. :-D
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut || 05/16/2005 11:35 Comments || Top||

#3  I can clearly see now what the Dem's definition of "independent judiciary" is.
Posted by: eLarson || 05/16/2005 11:35 Comments || Top||

#4  Ever here the saying: "Me thinks thou does protest too much." It has been my experience that those with glass houses like to throw stones at everyone else. I doubt that any of the leading Dhimicrats (or Republicans) could pass the anal probe that these groups are performing. But then they aren't exactly in hte truth business, they are in the mud business. Why not post an expose of the leaders and their background, that is ALWAYS entertaining.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge || 05/16/2005 11:49 Comments || Top||

#5  Judges have for years been required to provide financial disclosure statements that are available upon request, so that part's not new.
Posted by: Matt || 05/16/2005 20:21 Comments || Top||

#6  true - that's what the dirty-tricks crews are culling looking for dirt and innuendo. Kerry et al, refuse to release their tax returns without a mewl from the MSM. Hypocrites? Dem Donk teat-suckers...hope that "milk" is bitter
Posted by: Frank G || 05/16/2005 20:32 Comments || Top||


International-UN-NGOs
US warns nations seeking UNSC seat on veto
US officials have warned Japan, India, Germany and Brazil that they will not support their bids to join the UN Security Council unless they agree not to ask for veto power, the New York Times reported on Sunday, citing senior diplomats and administration officials. The current five permanent Security Council members - the United States, Britain, France, China and Russia, the victors of World War II - each have veto power in council decisions dating back to the creation of the United Nations in September 1945. Officials in the administration of President George W Bush fear that giving the new members veto power might paralyse the Security Council, the Times reported.
There's a difference between paralysis and torpor. Sometimes you just can't see it...
Posted by: Fred || 05/16/2005 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Good!
Posted by: 3dc || 05/16/2005 0:11 Comments || Top||

#2  Paralyse? The UNSC has been paralysed since its inception.
Posted by: Captain America || 05/16/2005 6:34 Comments || Top||

#3  Paralysed? More like a 2 week old dead man.
Posted by: mmurray821 || 05/16/2005 9:31 Comments || Top||

#4  Why Warn? Why not offer something else, like a new organization as an alternative to Dictators and Kleptocracy Inc.
Posted by: Jeper Elmeath5805 || 05/16/2005 9:34 Comments || Top||

#5  More like a 2 week old dead man.

Maybe we should start referring to it as "Bernie".
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 05/16/2005 10:42 Comments || Top||

#6  Excellent idea Bomb-a! UN, I hearby dub thee, Bernie.
Posted by: mmurray821 || 05/16/2005 11:45 Comments || Top||

#7  It should be the other way around. All you countries out there lets revise the UN Charter at the General Assembly. Sort of like a 2nd constitutional assembly or Vatican council. In it, we really reform the place and get rid of "all" vetoes and bring in new permanent SC members - one each from Eastern Europe, Asia, South America, Africa and North America. Believe me, denuding France, Russia and China of veto power will do more to reform the joint than one set of reforms will ever do.
Posted by: Jack is Back! || 05/16/2005 12:10 Comments || Top||

#8  Jeez, guys, it was designed to be paralyzed! That was the entire point at the time - slow down the course of events to give the Nuke powers time to get reasonable.

Sheesh. I'm gonna have to start charging for these tidbits of obviosity...
Posted by: mojo || 05/16/2005 13:19 Comments || Top||

#9  Give every state veto power and step back and watch the fun.
Posted by: rjschwarz || 05/16/2005 17:21 Comments || Top||

#10  The organization of the UNSC should be that only countries that are economically strong, militarily strong, and willing to commit significant forces to UN peacekeeping roles should both be members and have veto power. This would mean a guaranteed commitment of an *equivalent* of either direct military support, money, or requested equipment. If everyone who was willing participated, this would mean the US, Russia, China, India, Japan, and the EU. If you don't pay the ante, you can't play the game. Unless you have economic power, military power and a willingness to commit forces, then you have no veto. This would mean, say, if there was a genocide in Africa, Russia and India would *lose* their veto unless they were willing to send forces there. Then a simple majority, 4 of six, could vote to send in forces. This would mean that no commitments would be made without adequate force, equipment and money to back it up.
Posted by: Anonymoose || 05/16/2005 17:28 Comments || Top||

#11  This would mean, say, if there was a genocide in Africa, Russia and India would *lose* their veto unless they were willing to send forces there.
Posted by: Shipman || 05/16/2005 19:41 Comments || Top||

#12  This would mean, say, if there was a genocide in Africa, Russia and India would *lose* their veto unless they were willing to send forces there.
Posted by: Shipman || 05/16/2005 19:41 Comments || Top||

#13  Damnit.
This would mean, say, if there was a genocide in Africa, Russia and India would *lose* their veto unless they were willing to send forces there.

Or they could say they would but refuse. I remember this from 19.
Posted by: Shipman || 05/16/2005 19:42 Comments || Top||

#14  That only applies if commitments of resources such as troops and money were made *after* the event in question had begun, as it is inefficiently done today. Again, using the poker game analogy, each UNSC member would have to lay their bets before they get all of their cards. If they fold, they lose their stake to what the majority want. This means that, while they may not be enthusiastic to what is decided, their personnel will be on the ground, or somebody else's personnel will be doing the job with their money. The best part of this situation will be that most of the time, the UNSC will want to do *nothing*, but when the majority decide to do something, then everybody has to play. The sore loser, probably France, would betray itself if it tried to undermine what others were doing.
Posted by: Anonymoose || 05/16/2005 20:36 Comments || Top||


Southeast Asia
'Superpower behind' Burma blasts
Burma's government says rebels trained abroad by a "superpower" were behind last week's bombings at three shopping centres in the capital, Rangoon. Nineteen people are known to have died in the blasts, with 69 injured. The explosives used were not available in the country, and the plot was funded by a "world famous organisation", the military government said.
SPECTRE, KGB, CIA, NRA, KFC?
The junta said it believes the attacks were led by the Thailand-based All Burma Students Democratic Front. "It is crystal clear that the terrorists... and the time bombs originated from training conducted with foreign experts at a place in a neighbouring country by a world famous organisation of a certain superpower nation," Information Minister Kyaw Hsan told reporters.
That clears it right up. Thanks, Hsan.
He also accused the unnamed organisation - based in Washington - of having given $100,000 (£54,000) to a dissident group led by a cousin of pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi.
Based in Washington? Fred, you trying to overthrow another government?
Wudn't me. I've got it on my to-do list, though...
The group then sent a group of saboteurs to Burma to carry out the attacks, helped by ethnic Shan, Karen and Karenni rebels, the minister added. The three minority ethnic groups have denied any involvement. Even though the minister refused to name the suspected country and organisation, correspondents believe he was referring to the United States and the CIA.
Well, duh!
The bombs went off at two supermarkets and at a conference centre in Rangoon on 7 May. The Thai-based National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma, which has led a government in exile since 1990, has alleged the government might have had the bombs planted to blame the opposition.
That's what it smells like to me
Posted by: Steve || 05/16/2005 8:23:41 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Steve---those were my thoughts exactly when I first heard the boom news. Maybe the ruling govt is getting the heat, so they created a Reichstag fire-type situation to justify a crackdown. It's not exactly a flowering democracy over there. We will just have to wait for Newsweak to set us straight on events.
Posted by: Alaska Paul || 05/16/2005 9:54 Comments || Top||

#2  Fred, you trying to overthrow another government?

Do or do not. There is no try.
Posted by: Yoda || 05/16/2005 10:29 Comments || Top||

#3  The gov. in Burma is using poison gas against the Karin tribesmen. They just made a point back to the gov.
Posted by: 3dc || 05/16/2005 10:50 Comments || Top||

#4  It's the phone cops, man! Phone cops play hardball!
Posted by: Dr. Johnny Fever || 05/16/2005 22:42 Comments || Top||


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Woman racer upsets testosterone-driven Iran
Via No Pasaran, might be an old story:

Laleh Seddigh is fast emerging as one of Iran's foremost race car drivers, leaving best of men racers behind.


By Aresu Eqbali - TEHRAN

When behind the wheel, Iranian women have to put up with all sorts of verbal abuse from the testosterone-charged types that dominate the Islamic republic's highways - such as being told to tend to a washing machine rather than a car.


But Iran's women drivers, most of whom are clearly ill at ease navigating the anarchic road network, now have a national idol: a young woman nicknamed "Little Schumacher".


Laleh Seddigh, 28, is fast emerging as one of Iran's foremost race car drivers, leaving the best of the men racers behind in her saloon car.

--SNIP--
Posted by: anonymous2u || 05/16/2005 11:01 || Comments || Link || [7 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I suggest that she finish last to avoid a nasty post-race interrogation. As C3PO advized R2D2, "let the wookkie win."
Posted by: Super Hose || 05/16/2005 20:04 Comments || Top||

#2  Lol! HoseMan! Welcome Home!
Posted by: .com || 05/16/2005 20:12 Comments || Top||

#3  Yeah, it is an old story. And there was a good photo of her in the old article.
Posted by: Pappy || 05/16/2005 21:24 Comments || Top||


Africa: Subsaharan
ANGOLA: Marburg outbreak not under control
As the death toll from the Marburg virus in Angola creeps up to the 300 mark, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has expressed concern at the current situation and is warning that the outbreak is not yet over.

Uige-based WHO spokesperson Aphaluck Bhatiasevi told IRIN on Monday that some recently-identified cases of the killer disease had not been linked to earlier cases, raising fears that the epidemic was not yet under control since it first appeared in October 2004.

"The outbreak is not over. We've seen new cases in new municipalities that don't have obvious links to earlier cases of Marburg. We are very concerned about the situation," she said, speaking by phone from the northern Angolan province where all cases have so far originated.

"We are trying to do as much tracing as possible. But some of the cases we have seen in the last 10 days don't have a clear link to previous cases," she added. Its increasingly clear that there is at least one mode of transmission we don't know about. If its a new animal vector (and I suspect it may be) then Marburg will spread across whatever that animal's range is. Let's hope its not rats.

The rare haemorrhagic fever, which is from the same family as Ebola, is spread by body fluids including saliva, tears and blood. There is no specific cure and some 292 people have so far died from the 336 people who are known to have been infected. Its not clear if the increasing gap between cases and deaths indicates some people are surviving.

Deputy Health Minister Jose Van Dunem said that no new cases had been reported in over 21 days in provinces other than Uige, indicating that the epidemic was "over" in most of Angola. "We're having cases only in Uige city in the slums," he said. "We could say that [the epidemic] is over everywhere except Uige. But we need to maintain our surveillance system."

But convincing some communities to change their traditions in order to protect themselves from the communicable disease remained a serious challenge. "We're working hard on social mobilisation in communities in Uige, trying to motivate a change in behaviour," Van Dunem said. "We have some cultural problems. People think if they don't bathe the dead body then they are not properly putting them to rest," he added.

Bodily secretions increase after death, making the corpses of Marburg victims highly contagious. Specialists say communities must adapt their burial traditions in order to stop the chain of transmission of the disease.

Bhatiasevi said some breast milk had tested positive for Marburg, prompting calls for mothers suspected of being infected to avoid breastfeeding or wet feeding other children.

"If we get an alert from any suspected case of Marburg who may be breastfeeding, we try and convey the message to them," she said.

"But we have to be very careful with this message as breast milk is one of the major food sources for children here," she added. It also doesn't explain the cases with no known link.

According to a joint WHO and health ministry statement, 44 percent of reported Marburg cases have been among children. But thats down from 80% a couple of months back and indicates that recently children are less susceptible than adults. WHO appears to clutching at straws here.
Posted by: phil_b || 05/16/2005 19:17 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Airborne?
Posted by: Matt || 05/16/2005 20:22 Comments || Top||

#2  WHO has my sympathies on this one. Marburg and Ebola are two of only five known pathogens in this *family*, and both are so relatively new as known diseases that there is just not a lot that can be said for sure about them. I would suspect an insect vector, such as flies, that are attracted to bodily secretions, but otherwise unpredictable in how they spread disease. There might be a limit to how long the disease can survive in a fly. The questions just keep building up and the answers are few and come slowly.
Posted by: Anonymoose || 05/16/2005 20:45 Comments || Top||


Home Front: Culture Wars
Oh Noooo! NY Times to Make MoDo and Krugman PPV!
NYT.com to charge for Op-Ed, other content as of Sept (NYT) By Carolyn Pritchard
SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- The New York Times Co. (NYT) on Monday said that, starting in September, access to Op-Ed and certain of its top news columnists on the paper's NYTimes.com Web site will only be available through a fee of $49.95 a year. The service, known as TimesSelect, will also allow access to The Times's online archives, early access to select articles on the site, and other features. Home-delivery subscribers will automatically receive the service, the NYT said.

LOL - Wonder what genius thought this would bring in market share and revenoooo? HT to Cracker Barrel Philosopher
Posted by: Frank G || 05/16/2005 19:13 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  only thing better is the fact that with all teh fluffing in circulation figures bringing on auditors, we'll be able to find out just how much income this flatulence generates. Bet Fred's paypal's close if not over heh heh
Posted by: Frank G || 05/16/2005 19:18 Comments || Top||

#2  When the hackers start passing out logins and pwords, I hope they have a hack for the complete Sunday crossword. That dinky online version they have stinks. I want the fully, vicious and brutal one. Only on Sunday.
Posted by: Anonymoose || 05/16/2005 20:50 Comments || Top||

#3  The only reason I have NYT sent to my email box daily is so I can enjoy deleting it. Me pay for that utter crap? No way.
Posted by: Sock Puppet 0’ Doom || 05/16/2005 21:27 Comments || Top||

#4  Now YOU can read Maureen Dowd for only $49.99 per year $39.99 per year $19.95 per year $4.99 per year oh, hell, we'll pay you to read it.
Posted by: Mike || 05/16/2005 21:38 Comments || Top||

#5  Lol. In their dreams!

$50/yr will buy you a subscription to a kickass UseNet News Server - with 70-100,000 groups. No contest. (Note: more if you want the infamous alt groups, lol!)
Posted by: .com || 05/16/2005 22:16 Comments || Top||

#6  Anonymoose: You don't have to deal with the online version. NYT publishes a year's collection in book form, available at your friendly neighborhood big box bookstore. Now if I could just fine a book of Cryptics as easily!:)
Posted by: mom || 05/16/2005 22:33 Comments || Top||


"Disney World" girl found
A follow-up to the story posted last month on the Toronto police officers who do the "soul destroying" work of reviewing kiddie porn images to locate the victims.

After a three-year hunt involving investigators across the U.S. and Canada, a young girl who was featured on the Internet in a series of sexually explicit photographs has been found and is safe, police say.

The girl is nearly a teenager now and lives with a foster family, police add. Her adoptive father, who apparently took the pictures, is in prison for trading pornography online, according to police. . . . The FBI arrested her abuser two years ago in Pennsylvania. . . .

Sometimes, the good guys win one.
Posted by: Mike || 05/16/2005 15:50 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Good.
Posted by: mmurray821 || 05/16/2005 16:17 Comments || Top||

#2  Good! I was wondering about her, when I read that story ... glad to hear she's going to do better. What happened with the father, though? (That is, if he's the abuser who was arrested two years ago, where was she?)
Posted by: Edward Yee || 05/16/2005 16:26 Comments || Top||

#3  This is good news. I hope she does well and gets over it.

I wonder if the prison gen-pop know the background about the scumbag adoptive father......

I think they should....
Posted by: CrazyFool || 05/16/2005 16:31 Comments || Top||

#4  I think we should all know who the POS is and what he looks like upon release if that day ever comes.
Posted by: Tkat || 05/16/2005 16:37 Comments || Top||

#5  I got the sense that the girl was rescued from her situation when her creep father got arrested. The article mentions that she's in foster care.

I hope the gen-pop is aggressively applying the principle of instant karma to the creep. It's my understanding (correct me if I'm wrong, those who know such things) that many child molesters don't make it to their parole date alive.
Posted by: Mike || 05/16/2005 16:44 Comments || Top||


Joke-telling genitals don't get free-speech protection
Quick! Somebody warn Michael Moore!
Judges reject cable TV show host's free-speech defense
A penis that tells jokes on late night public access television may be expressive of something. But it is not the kind of free expression protected by the First Amendment, the Michigan Court of Appeals has decided, confirming the indecent exposure conviction of the show's producer and host.
"Hello, Grand Rapids! This is my doinker speaking!"
They must've been really, really bad jokes...
"Shuddup, doinker!"
Timothy Huffman, 47, who lives north of Grand Rapids, was convicted in Kent County after the penis episode aired twice in spring 2000 on the Grand Rapids public access cable channel GRTV. In affirming the conviction in an opinion released Wednesday, the appeals court said any "incidental restriction" on the First Amendment is "no greater than is essential to the furtherance of the governmental interest in promoting public morality by prohibiting public nudity." Huffman, whose defense was assisted by the American Civil Liberties Union, claimed the three-minute segment, "Dick Smart," was an expression of free speech and not obscene.
He's now known as "Dick Dumb". Or "Dick in the Can". And how'd you like to be the ACLU clown that caught this one?
Reached at his home Wednesday, Huffman said he is the victim of "a relentless prosecutor."
They rose up against me. They were hard on me. They just keep coming and coming. That's the meat of my case.
"In the end, they left me hanging, drained..."
"I'm truly trying to stand up for the constitution. It's a matter of principle," he said.
It's right there. See. Thomas Jefferson, "Thou shalt not infringe upon thy talking johnson..."
Huffman, an unemployed musician-cook who is the father of five children, said he'd been targeted for prosecution because he has a criminal record and lacked the resources to defend himself.
An unemployed musician-cook? Can you believe that...
I'm assuming "fry cook" here, and "not so hot" musician. And I'm assuming the conviction had something to do with airing out his gennies...
"We asked them in court, 'Why don't you prosecute 'Schindler's List'? It has nudity,' " Huffman said. "And they said to me, 'You're no Steven Spielberg.'
You're an unemployed musician-cook. And "Schindler's List" wasn't about a talking dick.
"I'm the low-life scapegoat that they can say, 'Look. This is what happens when you put this stuff on Grand Rapids TV.' "
Well at least he admits to being a low-life.
... and that's what happens when talking schlangs invade the teevee most other places. Except San Francisco, of course. There they run for office...
Kent County Assistant Prosecutor Tim McMorrow said Huffman is not being singled out, nor was he charged for expressing himself. "This is really not a First Amendment case," he said.
"It's more... ummm... a tiresome case. Yes, I think that's the word I'm looking for..."
"The First Amendment protects his right to an opinion, not the right to appear naked on TV."
Four years of college, law school, pass my boards. We got guys prosecuting death penalty cases and I'm arguing the Mr. Talking Dick case...
Huffman was sentenced and served one day in jail, one year of probation and was ordered to pay $1,035 in fines and court costs.
...and put that away.
He said he continues to produce the TV show "Tim's Area of Control" on GRTV and a two-hour program that airs in the wee hours of Saturday morning. Huffman said he mostly sticks to adult humor and music. The offensive-talking penis did a form of Rodney Dangerfield-esque comedy. ("Yeah, yeah, yeah. I was in the Army, ya know. I didn't do much, ya know what I mean? I just hung around.")
Probably didn't get no respect either. No respect at all...
Huffman said he and the station's then-supervisors believed the program was well within the bounds of free speech protection.
Like, okay, dude. Did you bring your bong, man?
He said he also hoped it would bring in a wider audience: "You need to have something that gets people to stop changing channels," he said. "I thought it would be good exposure... pardon the pun."
Maybe he should've had it speak Spanish. Or juggle...
Huffman said he would seek an appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Have at it, bub. No skin off my fore...
I'll be they're looking forward to it.
In the meantime, he said he also will be going to jail on another conviction, also for indecent exposure, that stemmed from a dispute with a neighbor.
Toldja so.
Huffman said he believed the latest charge was unjust. But, unlike the talking penis, it's not a free-speech case.
Wonder if it was arguing with the neighbor?
Posted by: tu3031 || 05/16/2005 11:49 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Ok, the LAST thing I want to see at 2am is somebody's wanker. Especially if he is playing with it.
Posted by: mmurray821 || 05/16/2005 12:42 Comments || Top||

#2  Talking penis' monologue cut off

by Lorena Bobbit

A penis that tells jokes on late night public access television may be expressive of something. . . .
Posted by: Mike || 05/16/2005 13:19 Comments || Top||

#3  LOL!
Posted by: Shipman || 05/16/2005 15:49 Comments || Top||

#4  I think the talking penis gag was first used in the movie "The Groove Tube", back in the 1970s. And for a while there, not too long ago, there was a traveling show with three guys who did a "Penis Puppet Show". I guess the bottom line is that your jokes have to be *good* to get First Amendment protection. For example, he wouldn't have been prosecuted if there had been *two* penii doing the "Who's on First" routine, or if he could do impersonations like Rich Little.
Posted by: Anonymoose || 05/16/2005 16:16 Comments || Top||

#5  The in-line commentary is awesome! Kudos to tu and Fred! My face hurts from laughing so hard, lol!

*standing ovation*
Posted by: .com || 05/16/2005 17:54 Comments || Top||

#6  Unfortunately for all of us, he is probably just 15 years ahead of his time. I write this because it is now near impossible to scroll through the channels without encoutering at least one commercial for natural male enhansement.
Posted by: Super Hose || 05/16/2005 21:52 Comments || Top||


The Family World System (A Bit Weird)
Posted by: tipper || 05/16/2005 11:09 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Stupid metaphor alert!

"Over this landscape, Göran Therborn's 'Between Sex and Power' rises like a majestic volcano. Throwing up a billowing column of the boldest ideas and arguments, while an awesome lava of evidence flows down its slopes, this is a great work of historical intellect and imagination."
Posted by: mojo || 05/16/2005 13:16 Comments || Top||

#2  Well, you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make a silk purse out of a pig in a poke.
Posted by: Anonymoose || 05/16/2005 16:18 Comments || Top||

#3  Did Sully Boy write this one? Sounds like what he has in mind when he uses his pet term, "the money graf."
Posted by: thibaud (aka lex) || 05/16/2005 16:21 Comments || Top||

#4  by Sully boy you mean Andrew Sullivan? He doesnt go near the ex-stalinists at The Nation, and he doesnt like poseur type prose, either.
Posted by: Liberalhawk || 05/16/2005 16:40 Comments || Top||

#5  The inevitable result of dumbing down public education. This is the sort of drivel that freshmen used to write to show how worldly they were.
Posted by: RWV || 05/16/2005 16:44 Comments || Top||


Africa: Horn
Ethiopians Overwhelm Polling Stations
Usual cries of foul play, stuffed ballot boxes, etc. Occasional fisticuffs but no gun sex so far ...
Posted by: Steve White || 05/16/2005 00:38 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:


Africa: Subsaharan
Zimbabwe Releases and Deports Mercenaries
HARARE, Zimbabwe (AP) - Sixty-one accused mercenaries held in Zimbabwe for more than a year for alleged involvement in a coup attempt in Equatorial Guinea were deported to South Africa on Sunday, where they could face charges of violating that country's anti-mercenary laws.

A lawyer for the men, Jonathan Samkange, said Zimbabwe released all 62 men who completed their yearlong sentence on immigration charges. Home Affairs spokesman Nkosana Sibuyi told the South African Press Association that one man was left behind in Harare because he was Zimbabwean.
Lucky him.
South African authorities said an investigation was continuing and the men could face charges in South Africa for violating anti-mercenary laws.
Posted by: Steve White || 05/16/2005 00:36 || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:

#1  How much money do you suppose changed hands on this one?
Posted by: Classical_Liberal || 05/16/2005 0:47 Comments || Top||

#2  Sixty-one accused mercenaries - but - Zimbabwe released all 62 men.
Whom was #62? The Lawyer?
Some random guy?
Posted by: 3dc || 05/16/2005 1:09 Comments || Top||

#3  They were supposed to be released last Tuesday, then it kept getting moved up a day. The final official story was that they were going to be released, but via undisclosed mode of transport and destination. I guess that their 'defense attorney' was doing a TV interview from Capetown should've been the tip-off.
Posted by: Pappy || 05/16/2005 10:18 Comments || Top||


Home Front: Tech
Opportunity Rover Begins Careful Rollout
NASA's Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity rotated its wheels on sol 463 for the first time since the rover dug itself into a sand dune more than two weeks earlier. The wheels made about two and a half rotations, as commanded, and the results were a good match for what was expected from tests on Earth, boosting the confidence of mission managers that they can get the rover out of the dune. In the loose footing, the rover advanced 2.8 centimeters (1.1 inch) forward, 4.8 millimeters (0.19 inch) sideways and 4.6 millimeters (0.18 inch) downward. After further analysis of the results, the rover team will decide whether to repeat the same careful movement again on sol 465. Meanwhile Opportunity's main tasks for sol 464 were remote-sensing observations.

Opportunity has started moving its wheels again after a couple weeks of holding still while taking some amazing images. While waiting for the rover team to finish tests for planning the best strategy for driving out of a sand trap, Opportunity has been busy taking a comprehensive color panorama of the area. On sol 461 (May 11), Opportunity straightened its wheels. After checking data and images confirming the success of that move, the team planned commands for beginning to rotate the wheels on sol 463 (May 13). The rover is healthy and ready to go...
Posted by: Spavirt Pheng6042 || 05/16/2005 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I have to keep reminding myself, the original mission for these rovers was only supposed to last, what, thirty days? Someone did some good design work.
Posted by: Dave D. || 05/16/2005 0:08 Comments || Top||

#2  I'd like to meet the folks who designed these amazing machines and the folks on the factory floor who assembled them. As a technical and scientific achievement the rover project is beginning to rank right up there with Apollo.
Posted by: Matt || 05/16/2005 8:46 Comments || Top||

#3  If it's such a hot design why didn't they include a little tiny come-along?
Posted by: Shipman || 05/16/2005 10:48 Comments || Top||

#4  lol ship!
Posted by: Frank G || 05/16/2005 11:01 Comments || Top||


Afghanistan/South Asia
Police raids wedding halls
ISLAMABAD: The district administration and police conducted raids at various wedding halls on Sunday and registered cases against two wedding halls, Pakistan Palace and Embassy Lodge, for violating the ban on serving food. The administration had issued notice to the owners. The case against the offending marriage halls has been registered under Sections 3,4 and 5 of the Marriage Act.
Posted by: Fred || 05/16/2005 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Why can't folks eat at a wedding?
Posted by: 3dc || 05/16/2005 0:15 Comments || Top||

#2  Next thing you know... they won't let the bridesmaids flirt with the best men...

Oh you mean they don't?

Why would anybody want to go to a wedding then... Just for the gunsex afterwards?
Posted by: 3dc || 05/16/2005 0:16 Comments || Top||

#3  The district administration and police conducted raids at various wedding halls on Sunday ...

How many AK-47's did they get?
Posted by: Raj || 05/16/2005 11:58 Comments || Top||

#4  The only reason they'd be looking for an AK if it was in a tray of potato salad. And then they'd probably give it back.
Posted by: tu3031 || 05/16/2005 12:42 Comments || Top||

#5  From the blog of an English professor at Lehigh University:

http://www.lehigh.edu/~amsp/2004/11/no-wedding-food-for-you-and-freedom-to.html

"BBC says the Pakistani courts have reviewed and upheld a ban on food at weddings, on the grounds that it is anti-Islamic. Well, to be more exact:

The court ruled the ban was not against Islamic teachings and should remain in force as it discourages extravagant displays of wealth. The ban on serving food at wedding functions held in public places was imposed by the government in 1997. In practice, it is largely ignored as technically it only permits the serving of tea or soft drinks.


To be fair, they have a point that South Asians put an inordinate amount of money into weddings. But banning food "for your own good" seems like a parody of totalitarian thinking.

For Pakistan's Supreme Court, it's all part of de-Hinduization:

The Supreme Court also described the practice of giving dowry by the bride's family as an evil and exploitative custom, and said the state should do everything to stop it.

The court bench then went a step further to criticise some of the most popular customs linked to South Asian weddings, including the colourful rituals of mayun and mehndi (where the bride is decorated and prepared for the wedding) and baraat (a procession by the groom's friends and family to the bride's house), which are dominated by dance and music.

The bench said these customs and even the giving of large dowries were all of Hindu origin and have nothing to do with the Islamic concept of marriage."
Posted by: Seafarious || 05/16/2005 12:49 Comments || Top||

#6  Interesting role for a supreme court - upholding religious extremism.
Thousands of years of common culture must vanish in order to achieve true islam.
No music, No dancing, no rituals, no food.

Posted by: john || 05/16/2005 18:43 Comments || Top||

#7  "but the 8 yr old bridesmaid may be yours...for a price"
Posted by: Frank G || 05/16/2005 19:33 Comments || Top||

#8  I wonder if the original Moslem prohibitions in this case were a reaction to the excesses in wedding back then? I try to remember that one of the reasons Islam was so popular back that was that it outlawed lots of the primitive extremes of tribalism. Unfortunately, in his efforts to modernize, Mohammed created no mechanism to accept continued modernization, leaving his followers at square one.
Posted by: Anonymoose || 05/16/2005 21:08 Comments || Top||

#9  Better than being at Ground Zero.
Posted by: jackal || 05/16/2005 22:48 Comments || Top||


Mukherjee Hurt in Congress Brawl
Defense Minister Pranab Mukherjee was yesterday roughed up and his clothes torn by Congress workers angry over the allocation of tickets for the civic elections here. No sooner had Mukherjee, who is president of the West Bengal unit of the Congress, stepped out of his car to enter the party office to announce candidates of the Congress-led United Democratic Alliance, a group of Congress workers mobbed him.

The mob, livid over "denial" of party nomination to grass root workers for the June 19 Calcutta Municipal Corporation elections, pounced on Mukherjee, taking his security guards by surprise. The defense minister fought back, leading to a scuffle in which his clothes were torn. He was allegedly slapped. The attackers also abused Mukherjee. Acting state Congress President Pradip Bhattacharjee was also assaulted. Several mediapersons were injured in the scuffle. The free-for-all continued for over an hour. Gradually Mukherjee's securitymen and other Congress workers took control of the situation and police were deployed in large numbers. The Congress workers were angry over the denial of ticket to an activist in ward No. 55 and some other seats following a tie-up with the newly formed party of Calcutta Mayor Subrata Mukherjee.
Posted by: Fred || 05/16/2005 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


I'M CONFUZZLED
Can someone help me LOL - everytime i post an article Rantburg assigns me a nickname - im now known as Spavirt Pheng6042 ??
I can't seem to change it back to God Save The World

any suggestions would be appreciated...

thanks in advance - :P

Make sure your browser accepts cookies.

You should be able to simply change your name in the poster box of the editor. A cookie's set every time you post. That's the way it should work, but since I've just rebuilt most of the site, there are probably bugs to be found, and this could be one.

As an alternative, go to the main page and make a comment. Make sure you change your name in the poster box. Your cookie will be set and the system should remember you until you move to another machine and have to repeat the process.
Posted by: Spavirt Pheng6042 || 05/16/2005 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  God Save The World,
I can't help you. I am a 'puter ignoramus.
Posted by: Dim || 05/16/2005 1:20 Comments || Top||

#2  Please email these trivial questions, instead of posting them in articles.
Posted by: gromky || 05/16/2005 1:46 Comments || Top||

#3  I put this up top in case somebody else is having similar problems.
Posted by: Fred || 05/16/2005 7:35 Comments || Top||

#4  Well, I've been away for a coupla days... why aren't the usual page titles ("Oderint dum metuant", "never forgive, never forget", etc, etc) displayed? This "all articles" is a bit lame... plus the look of the pages have changed... or am I missing something, as I often do? Damn, how I hate change! Everything should stay the same, forever!
Posted by: Anonymous5089 || 05/16/2005 7:45 Comments || Top||

#5  I like the 'All articles' (a lot).
Posted by: phil_b || 05/16/2005 7:52 Comments || Top||

#6  Can someone move this to Page 3?

Maybe Rantburg needs a FAQ?
Posted by: CrazyFool || 05/16/2005 9:15 Comments || Top||

#7  A5089 - That brings to mind my favorite of the "Laws":

Never do anything for the first time.

Kinda rocks when you let it percolate, lol!
Posted by: .com || 05/16/2005 17:32 Comments || Top||


Afghanistan/South Asia
Girl sexually assaulted: Panchayat bars the course of law
MULTAN: The face of a prayer leader was blackened on the orders of a panchayat (tribal jury) headed by Rana Faiz Bakhsh Jhakkar in Chah Ghupwala (Shujabad), about 40 kilometres southwest of Multan, on Sunday. People had caught Maulvi Ghulam Qadir, 70, sexually assaulting seven-year-old girl Safia. The girl was taken to Nishtar Hospital in Multan in critical condition. The local landlord did not let Safia's parents take the case to the police and instead sent it to a panchayat, which ordered the maulvi's face to be blackened.
Boiling pitch would blacken it just fine, right?
Posted by: Fred || 05/16/2005 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  A baseball bat can do a fine job of blackening.
Posted by: Sock Puppet 0’ Doom || 05/16/2005 0:35 Comments || Top||

#2  ... The local landlord did not let Safia's parents take the case to the police...

Whoa! The landlord can control what you do?
So these folks are serfs or slaves?
Posted by: 3dc || 05/16/2005 0:43 Comments || Top||

#3  Ummm... Serfs.
Posted by: Fred || 05/16/2005 7:50 Comments || Top||

#4  ordered the maulvi's face to be blackened
Yumm, Blackened Maulvi Etouffee, Cajun Style!
Posted by: Steve || 05/16/2005 12:22 Comments || Top||

#5  Mmmmmmmmmmmm...grilled maulvi face...
Posted by: tu3031 || 05/16/2005 12:23 Comments || Top||

#6  I'm surprised they don't kill the child for provoking the bastard into sinning.
Posted by: BrerRabbit || 05/16/2005 20:56 Comments || Top||



Who's in the News
76[untagged]

Bookmark
E-Mail Me

The Classics
The O Club
Rantburg Store
The Bloids
The Never-ending Story
Thugburg
Gulf War I
The Way We Were
Bio

Merry-Go-Blog











On Sale now!


A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.

Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.

Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has dominated Mexico for six years.
Click here for more information

Meet the Mods
In no particular order...
Steve White
Seafarious
tu3031
badanov
sherry
ryuge
GolfBravoUSMC
Bright Pebbles
trailing wife
Gloria
Fred
Besoeker
Glenmore
Frank G
3dc
Skidmark

Two weeks of WOT
Mon 2005-05-16
  Uzbeks expel town leaders from Korasuv
Sun 2005-05-15
  500 reported dead in Uzbek unrest
Sat 2005-05-14
  Qaeda big Predizapped in NWFP
Fri 2005-05-13
  Uprising in Uzbekistan
Thu 2005-05-12
  New al-Qaeda group formed in Algeria
Wed 2005-05-11
  Capitol and White House Evacuated
Tue 2005-05-10
  Attempted Grenade Attack on President Bush?
Mon 2005-05-09
  U.S. Offensive in Western Iraq Kills 75
Sun 2005-05-08
  Aoun Returns From Exile
Sat 2005-05-07
  Egypt Arrests Senior Muslim Brotherhood Leaders
Fri 2005-05-06
  Marines Land on Somali Coast to Hunt Terrs?
Thu 2005-05-05
  20 40 64 Pakistanis Talibs killed
Wed 2005-05-04
  Al-Libbi in Jug!
Tue 2005-05-03
  Iraq: Bloody Battle in the Desert
Mon 2005-05-02
  25 killed in attack on Mosul funeral


Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
13.59.36.203
Help keep the Burg running! Paypal:
WoT Operations (19)    WoT Background (29)    Opinion (1)    (0)    (0)