Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 04/16/2010 View Thu 04/15/2010 View Wed 04/14/2010 View Tue 04/13/2010 View Mon 04/12/2010 View Sun 04/11/2010 View Sat 04/10/2010
1
2010-04-16 Home Front: Politix
Behavioral economics—the governing theory of Obama's nanny state.
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by tipper 2010-04-16 00:14|| || Front Page|| [3 views ]  Top

#1 
Among the many transformative experiences President Obama says he has planned for us, one in particular has gone relatively unnoticed. He has vowed to remake the methods by which the federal government regulates our homes, our offices, our roads and brooms and thimbles, our roller skates and garden tools and tortilla chips and sunglasses—nearly everything. The federal government regulates nearly everything already, of course, but now the new administration wants to regulate by different lights. A few days after taking office last year, Obama signed a presidential memorandum to set our new transformative experience in motion.

The memorandum began by noting that federal regulatory policy has lately been governed by an executive order issued in 1993. Political activists disliked the old order—EO 12866, as it’s known among regulation buffs—because they saw it as a hindrance to new and ever more sweeping regulations. EO 12866 made the job of regulating difficult by requiring a federal agency to perform onerous cost-benefit analyses on each regulation it proposed and to rework the rules that proved too costly. In his memorandum, the president suggested that this approach, while perhaps well-meaning, was the product of a less sophisticated, pre-Obama era.

“A great deal has been learned since that time,” he wrote. “Far more is now known about regulation—not only about when it is justified, but also about what works and what does not. .  .  . In this time of fundamental transformation, that process—and the principles governing regulation in general​—should be revisited.”
Posted by Parabellum 2010-04-16 08:23|| http://sidemeat.wordpress.com/  2010-04-16 08:23|| Front Page Top

23:52 Pappy
23:49 Pappy
23:35 trailing wife
23:28 trailing wife
23:15 gorb
23:03 DarthVader
22:59 trailing wife
22:56 trailing wife
22:52 JosephMendiola
22:49 JosephMendiola
22:45 JosephMendiola
22:29 trailing wife
22:12 ryuge
22:09 trailing wife
22:08 trailing wife
22:05 trailing wife
21:34 trailing wife
21:24 Redneck Jim
21:08 lotp
21:06  Anonymoose
20:56 Flaper Scourge of the Algonquins4926
20:43 lotp
20:34 Deacon Blues
20:29 OldSpook









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com