Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 08/19/2012 View Sat 08/18/2012 View Fri 08/17/2012 View Thu 08/16/2012 View Wed 08/15/2012 View Tue 08/14/2012 View Mon 08/13/2012
1
2012-08-19 Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Debka so salt: Israel names price to delay attack until Spring (after election)
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Water Modem 2012-08-19 00:00|| || Front Page|| [4 views ]  Top

#1 Of course being a double dealer himself, the One would ponder "what if I agree to all this, and the [expletives] still attack before election day?". It's not like he's ever played Chicago politics to consider such an scenario.
Posted by Procopius2k 2012-08-19 08:54||   2012-08-19 08:54|| Front Page Top

#2 I see the advantages to O & Co. But, given O's record of keeping his word, what are the advantages to Israel?
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2012-08-19 09:10||   2012-08-19 09:10|| Front Page Top

#3 The problem is, Obama is known for his weakness against Iran. Both Israel and Iran know this. If this is true, then some extra diplomatic pressure might be helpful, but everyone just might ignore it too.

Posted by DarthVader 2012-08-19 10:53||   2012-08-19 10:53|| Front Page Top

#4 Evidence that this is BS found with the Tom Donilon lead, and the excerpt below:

1. President Obama will formally inform the two houses of congress in writing that he plans to use military force to prevent Iran from arming itself with a nuclear weapon.
Posted by Besoeker 2012-08-19 11:23||   2012-08-19 11:23|| Front Page Top

#5 Of course, any deal made with O would not be binding on Romney. So why would Israel make such a deal?
Posted by Spot 2012-08-19 13:24||   2012-08-19 13:24|| Front Page Top

#6 Because they aren't ready to go Spot.
See item#3.
Posted by Skidmark 2012-08-19 16:00||   2012-08-19 16:00|| Front Page Top

#7 I think it is more likely that Israel will reoccupy the Sinai and Gaza strip than attack Iran before the elections.

If Egypt has completely tossed out the peace treaty, Israel would be justified in reoccupation of those areas.
Posted by crosspatch 2012-08-19 17:46||   2012-08-19 17:46|| Front Page Top

#8 Israel has asked Egypt to withdraw its Armor, i.e. Main Battle Tanks + Mech/Infantry Fighting Vehicles, from the Sinai as these are in violation of the Sinai treaty.

The US = POTUS BAMMER may have a serious problem wid NOT-IRAN before October or espec the November elections iff Egypt refuses.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2012-08-19 21:41||   2012-08-19 21:41|| Front Page Top

22:43 canalzone
22:21 Rambler in Virginia
21:59 Besoeker
21:41 JosephMendiola
21:40 trailing wife
21:37 trailing wife
21:33 trailing wife
21:17 tu3031
21:12 USN, ret.
21:12 junkiron
21:09 URGENT
21:07 Uninemp Glelet3818
21:01 USN, ret.
20:36 lotp
20:19 Broadhead6
20:19 JosephMendiola
20:16 Frank G
20:15 Frank G
20:15 Frank G
20:12 Frank G
20:12 Broadhead6
20:10 Pappy
20:06 JosephMendiola
19:58 Bright Pebbles









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com