Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 08/13/2008 View Tue 08/12/2008 View Mon 08/11/2008 View Sun 08/10/2008 View Sat 08/09/2008 View Fri 08/08/2008 View Thu 08/07/2008
1
2008-08-13 Science & Technology
Dakato windfarm's size limited to 180 MW because tranmission lines not big enough.
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by 3dc 2008-08-13 12:22|| || Front Page|| [3 views ]  Top

#1 Billions for earmarks and not a penny for needed infrastructure.
Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2008-08-13 13:08||   2008-08-13 13:08|| Front Page Top

#2 I have a business idea that I need to flesh out.

Could power sources in this situation be used to make fertilizer? How small could you shrink the Haber process?
Posted by Abdominal Snowman 2008-08-13 13:56||   2008-08-13 13:56|| Front Page Top

#3 The problem is that wind turbines only produce between 10% and 20% of their capacity, but you need the infrastructure to support the rare occasions when they produce at peak capacity. So you need to build 5 to 10 times more transmission capacity. Which is why even if wind made economic sense at the point of generation, it's still a bad idea.
Posted by phil_b 2008-08-13 14:07||   2008-08-13 14:07|| Front Page Top

#4 AS - an interesting idea!
Posted by 3dc 2008-08-13 15:06||   2008-08-13 15:06|| Front Page Top

#5 AS has the right idea. We should be using wind power for off-grid applications that don't need on demand power. Two occur to me - desalination and heating shale oil deposits.

You need to talk to a chemical engineer, but the Haber process looks to me like it requires a continuous process, ie a continous power supply, which wind isn't.
Posted by phil_b 2008-08-13 15:30||   2008-08-13 15:30|| Front Page Top

#6 Shale in ND.
Posted by 3dc 2008-08-13 15:43||   2008-08-13 15:43|| Front Page Top

#7 PR piece for the wind farm. Be interesting to see what they have to say in 3-5 years, after the warts are exposed. Can these operations survive without federal handouts?
Posted by tipover 2008-08-13 15:54||   2008-08-13 15:54|| Front Page Top

#8 3dc, you put the windmills where you need the power.
Posted by phil_b 2008-08-13 16:44||   2008-08-13 16:44|| Front Page Top

#9 tip

wont that depend on energy prices at the time?
Posted by supergalitz 2008-08-13 16:45||   2008-08-13 16:45|| Front Page Top

#10 Does it even take a college freshman to tell them that if they double the voltage in their lines it will cut the amps in half? Then they could use very, very small lines if they wanted. P=I*V or if you need it V=I*R. There you go, now off to work.
Posted by bigjim-ky 2008-08-13 17:14||   2008-08-13 17:14|| Front Page Top

#11 Make hydrogen from splitting water with any spare power.
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2008-08-13 18:08||   2008-08-13 18:08|| Front Page Top

#12 tipover, my father knows a company rep in Sacramento that tells him that it is a break even business, in a good year. The other 4 out of 5 years it is a subsidy situation.
Posted by  bigjim-ky 2008-08-13 18:43||   2008-08-13 18:43|| Front Page Top

23:43 FOTSGreg
23:35 Correction
23:33 JosephMendiola
23:29 Correction
23:28 rjschwarz
23:23 Halliburton - Blogosphere Welcome Division
23:23 Jiggs Chiter5628
23:20 JosephMendiola
23:17 Correction
23:12 3dc
23:11 tipover
23:02 Steve White
22:56 Classical_Liberal
22:55 Correction
22:36 Halliburton - Asymmetrical Reply Division
22:35 crosspatch
22:33 McZoid
22:30 Hupusong Hatfield aka Broadhead6
22:30 Besoeker
22:23 Hupusong Hatfield aka Broadhead6
22:22 McZoid
22:21 USN,Ret.
22:18 lotp
22:18 Halliburton - Asymmetrical Reply Division









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com