Article

2011-02-19 Science & Technology

Navy Talks About New Laser Tech: Maybe Too Damn Much

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Mercutio 2011-02-19 15:54|| || Front Page|| [11133 views ] Top

#1 It's "cut the defense budget" time.

Posted by Pappy 2011-02-19 17:16|| 2011-02-19 17:16|| Front Page Top

#2 Two things I DON'T want to know:

1. My wife's Christmas budget; and
2. The true capabilities of our military.....

'effing dopes to release this -unless- there's really something special they're not telling us.......

Posted by Uncle Phester 2011-02-19 17:54|| 2011-02-19 17:54|| Front Page Top

#3 What they are not saying is that the Democrats are actively opposed to any energy based, or other missile defense system, for the US, or the US Navy.

This is so bad that even though the airborne laser had proven itself, the Dems cut its funding immediately on getting control of congress, along with several other anti-missile programs.

Boeing and the other manufacturers said they were going to continue research without government money, because it was working so well. And they expect the Republicans to bring it back, with interest.

Posted by Anonymoose 2011-02-19 18:22|| 2011-02-19 18:22|| Front Page Top

#4 Airborne lasers are a waste of time IMO. The main application of lasers is to make ships at sea invincible to airborne threats.

Posted by phil_b 2011-02-19 18:54|| 2011-02-19 18:54|| Front Page Top

#5 Lasers propagate much better in the upper atmosphere and space due to a lack of scattering and absorption by the atmosphere. The problem with airborne lasers shooting down ICBMs is distances of hundreds or thousands of km vs a few to tens of km for shipborne air defense. Even the FEL won't work when it is raining or fogged over.

Posted by Pearl Gleaper1127 2011-02-19 20:38|| 2011-02-19 20:38|| Front Page Top

#6 Curvature of the earth/line of sight also a figure.

Posted by swksvolFF 2011-02-19 22:26|| 2011-02-19 22:26|| Front Page Top

#7 Since the atmosphere is such a problem for ground based lasers, do you think that maybe the target for a big airborne laser could be something not in the atmosphere? Perhaps it gives our enemies a reason for pause...

Posted by rammer 2011-02-19 22:48|| 2011-02-19 22:48|| Front Page Top

23:53 crosspatch
23:38 trailing wife
23:31 trailing wife
23:27 trailing wife
22:58 swksvolFF
22:48 rammer
22:36 Alaska Paul
22:26 swksvolFF
22:21 swksvolFF
22:16 Zhang Fei
22:07 gromky
21:47 Mullah Richard
21:10 Bill Clinton
21:09 James Carville/Karl Rove
21:09 Procopius2k
20:44 Pearl Gleaper1127
20:38 Pearl Gleaper1127
20:21 Alaska Paul
20:09 gorb
20:03 Nimble Spemble
20:02 Nimble Spemble
20:02 Alaska Paul
19:57 phil_b
19:47 Pearl Gleaper1127