[PAGESIX] Hillary Clinton ... sometimes described as The Heroine of Tuzla and at other times as Mrs. Bill, never as Another Richelieu ... is furious at husband Bill Clinton ...former Democratic president of the U.S. Bill was the second U.S. president to be impeached, the first to deny that oral sex was sex, the first to have difficulty with the definition of is... , according to Washington insiders, after his name came up in the latest sex scandal involving his disgraced former pal Jeffrey Epstein
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Fred ||
01/10/2015 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[13 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
Bill, the spy said, had been waiting for his wife, who didnt look too happy with him.
#3
Doesn't matter. Every welfare recipient, every public employee, every ag subsidy recipient, and every grant recipient professor will pull the "D" lever for her even if she set fire to a busload of third graders on national TV. If not her, then Warren, or whomever the Dems throw up. The vote of those people will go to whomever has the highest chance of getting in office and leaving their magic paychecks alone. The sum total of publicly funded who will vote for someone who is fiscally conservative could fit in a telephone booth.
Obsessing with this gets the center/right off message. Winning in 2016 is a function of getting conservatives and libertarians to vote for the non-Dem candidate, not hoping that a sex scandal will sour the publicly funded on voting for their paycheck.
Posted by: no mo uro ||
01/10/2015 6:54 Comments ||
Top||
#4
Lets not forget undocumented Americans & the hereditary oppressed, no mo uro.
#5
Bill Clinton does not care one bit what Hillary thinks of him. Literally his punishment is having to still deal with Hillary on a weekly or monthly basis at these type of public events.
#6
It really does not matter, she has so many soiled clothes in her political closet. Virtually any political subject she attempts to engage in during her potential presidential bid will carry an odor of her past incompetence or malfeasance.
Bill is an odorous, vain person, one who sees nothing wrong about himself. At this point in his life, I doubt he even cares what she thinks. His marriage has been a shell for years, wealth and influence are the spoils from their corrupt lives. Bill will remind you, he is an Oxford man, and he has the shoes to prove it.
#7
I doubt that she is furious that he did whatever he did - she is used to that by now. She is furious that his name came up on the list.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia ||
01/10/2015 9:37 Comments ||
Top||
#8
Epstein's Black Book could prove most interesting. Underage girls aren't the only thing the billionaire mega-yacht owners that traverse the area seem to have a penchant for. He owns St. James, USVI, which is conveniently located on the cocaine cartel's delivery route from So. America north....
#12
I is a gubbamint employee and I rarely vote Democrat
Posted by: Frank G ||
01/10/2015 11:30 Comments ||
Top||
#13
Bill and Hillary, who had put on their best Metro disguises, were recently spotted on the street, a passer by took exception and warned the little girls in the neighborhood.
#15
Asalaam aleikum, Besoeker!
Yeah,the public employee/Democrat charge *is* painting with a broad brush. But I'd bet a round of drinks the distribution is something like 80:20 Democratic, especially when public unions are involved.
Leaders of the House and Senate Judiciary committees on Friday called on the Justice Department to end the sharing of civil seizure proceeds with local and state police, a change that with few exceptions would cut the flow of hundreds of million of dollars annually to departments in every state.
In a letter to Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., the lawmakers said they think money from Justice’s Equitable Sharing Program, the federal government’s largest civil asset forfeiture initiative, may be encouraging heavy-handed tactics by local and state police agencies.
Equitable Sharing allows police who seize property under federal civil law to keep up to 80 percent of the proceeds, while Justice and other participating federal agencies can keep 20 percent or more. In 2012, the most recent year of complete data available to The Washington Post, seizures worth more than $1.5 billion in cash, cars and other property were processed through the program.
Why should these assets go ONLY to police and not to general tax funds - never discussed. Why these these assets be seized at all - hardly discussed. What is the potential for this type of seizure to be used as yet another part of executive overreach - do not discuss this!
#1
Why should these assets go ONLY to police and not to general tax funds
Can you say conflict of interest? When they 'executed' the accused witches in Salem guess who collected the property of the deceased. Could you guess the magistrate and sheriff?
#3
In a letter to Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., the lawmakers said they think money from Justice’s Equitable Sharing Program, the federal government’s largest civil asset forfeiture initiative, may be encouraging heavy-handed tactics by local and state police agencies
More important is that it's bribery by the Justice Department.
#4
Local agencies use this program to dodge local laws which limit forfeiture. Illegal in your state? No problem! Call the feds. Get a cut of the take.
#5
I seriously doubt they give a rat's ass about heavy handed tactics by local and state cops. They just don't wanna share anymore.
Posted by: Abu Uluque ||
01/10/2015 13:57 Comments ||
Top||
#6
Victim compensation fund, and fund for wrongly convicted. The ONLY place the money should go. No place that the cops or govt has a fiduciary interest.
[THEHILL] Record-low gas prices across the U.S. have given rise to fresh talk in Washington of raising the federal gas tax for the first time in over 20 years, with leading Republicans now saying a hike must not be ruled out.
The GOP has long resisted calls from business leaders and others to boost the 18.4 cent-per-gallon tax as a way to pay for upgrades to the nations crumbling roads and bridges.
Yet in recent days, senior Senate Republicans have said they want to keep options open and that "nothing is off the table" when weighing the best mechanisms to pay to finance infrastructure projects. Nothing is off the table, save for a tax cut.
"I just think that option is there, it's clearly one of the options," said Sen. Inhofe (R-Okla.), new chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Senate Finance Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), the third-ranking Senate Republican, also said they were open to the possibility of raising the tax.
Democratic leaders in both chambers of Congress, meanwhile, declared this week that now is the time for an increase.
While major obstacles stand in the way namely the House of Representatives business groups believe there is a real chance to raise the tax in the final two years of the B.O. regime.
Comments this week from Sens. Inhofe, Hatch and Thune signal a growing recognition that the gas tax is a fair and consistent way to fund our infrastructure needs, Association of Equipment Manufacturers front man Michael OBrien said in an interview on Thursday.
Democrats have typically been more open to the idea of hiking the gas tax, but its the shift in Republicans' tone that is drawing more attention to the possibility.
Posted by: Fred ||
01/10/2015 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[8 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
So this tax increase would be used to fund infrastructure repairs that should have been funded by the previous taxes that were diverted to the general fund, or spent on underwriting hugely overpriced boondoggles like the California bullet train.
#4
What about shutting down the Department of Education, firing the bunny inspectors and other useless Federal paycheck cashers, etc? Why is the subject being changed?
#6
So this tax increase would be used to fund infrastructure repairs that should have been funded by the previous taxes that were diverted to the general fund
And this one will also end up going to the general fund for things like "Free" Community College 'to teach' people what the K-12 system failed to teach them.
So the 'Infrastructure' still will not be maintained (and the college students still won't be taught what they should have been taught in K-12).
And we would be looking at even higher tax increases in the future to pay, once again, for infrastructure maintenance.
#12
Not one moment's consideration for a spending cut now that they have the votes to enforce it. Not a dime's worth of difference between the current crop of Republicans and Democrats. Watch them not repeal ObamaCare or do anything about executive amnesty either.
Posted by: Abu Uluque ||
01/10/2015 14:03 Comments ||
Top||
#13
By all means, raise the gas tax a nickel a gallon. But in the same bill: Clear keystone and lower all income tax rates by 20% or so and pass a balanced budget law.
#16
Yeah, sure. Put a ten cent tax on gas dedicated to the infrastructure. Then, lay a tariff to keep the cost of imported oil at $60, with the proceeds going solely to advanced energy development: non-conventional fission, fusion, black solar cells, and advanced energy storage, e.g. carbon nanotube capacitors.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
Hillary Clinton
