Posted by: Sven the pelter ||
10/18/2015 13:01 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[8 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
The fundamental producer of income inequality is freedom. Individuals have different aptitudes and attitudes. Not even universal free public education, even were it well done, could equalize the ability of individuals to add value to the economy.
Basic truth. The donk's try to peddle the idea that the reason that rich people are rich is because the system is unfair. Only an unfair system would produce an even distribution of wealth.
Posted by: Sven the pelter ||
10/18/2015 20:13 Comments ||
Top||
[UnitedLiberty] "If Romney were president right now, the White House would be surrounded by protesters and candlelight peace vigils night and calling for impeachment, some would have pictures caricaturing the president as Hitler or an animal. They would chant "Not in our name!", or "Bring them home!", or "Hey ho, hey ho, Romney has got to go!"day. Some would wave American flags, some would wave signs
If Romney were president, nightly news reports on CBS, NBC, and ABC would have regular features on war crimes, quagmires, and collateral damage. CNN would be wall-to-wall with team coverage of protests, interviews of bombing witnesses, and Anderson Cooper walking through rubble in full body armor." Read the whole thing - too much to excerpt it here, all of it accurate.
Posted by: Barbara ||
10/18/2015 11:57 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[2 views]
Top|| File under:
Presented is former State Department "Special Advisor" Frederic Hof's much-ballyhooed Politico article. Some excerpts follow.
Now and then I am asked if I had predicted, way back in March 2011 when violence in Syria began, that within a few years a quarter-million people would be dead, half the population homeless and hundreds of thousands of defenseless civilians terrorized, traumatized, tortured and starved. The companion question, more often than not, is if I had forecast the failure of the West to offer any protection at all to Syrian civilians subjected to a systematic campaign of mass homicide. Having first been exposed to Syria as a teenage exchange student, I was expected by questioners to know something about the place. And as a State Department officer, I was assumed to know something about my government.
But no. It took me the better part of eighteen months to comprehend fully the scope of an unfolding humanitarian and political catastrophe. By September 2012, when I resigned my State Department post as adviser on Syrian political transition to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, I knew that Syria was plunging into an uncharted abyss—a humanitarian abomination of the first order. And I knew that the White House had little appetite for protecting civilians (beyond writing checks for refugee relief) and little interest in even devising a strategy to implement President Barack Obama’s stated desire that Syrian President Bashar Assad step aside. But at the beginning, nothing drawn from my many years of involvement in Syria inspired accurate prophesy.
It didn’t have to turn out this way, and I remain mildly surprised that it did. It is not that Syrians were without grievances concerning the way they were being governed. Although the regime’s corruption, incompetence and brutal intolerance of dissent were hardly state secrets, Assad was not universally associated by Syrians with the system’s worst aspects: “If only the president knew” was a phrase one heard often.
Some Syria watchers believed that the Arab Spring would visit the country in the form of political cyclone. I did not. I did not think it inevitable that Assad — a computer-savvy individual who knew mass murder could not remain hidden from view in the 21st century — would react to peaceful protest as violently as he did, with no accompanying political outreach. And as Syria began to descend into the hell to which Assad was leading it, I did not realize that the White House would see the problem as essentially a communications challenge: getting Obama on “the right side of history” in terms of his public pronouncements. What the United States would do to try to influence Syria’s direction never enjoyed the same policy priority as what the United States would say.
Having failed miserably as a prophet in 2011 does not deter me from predicting the following: Obama will bequeath to his successor a problem of gargantuan dimensions if he does not change policy course now. Left to the joint ministrations of Assad and the Islamic State, Syria will continue to hemorrhage terrified, hungry and hurt human beings in all directions while terrorists from around the globe feast on the carcass of an utterly ruined state. Western Europe now reaps a whirlwind of desperate and displaced humanity it thought would be limited to Syria’s immediate neighborhood.
I want the president to change course, but I fear that Syrians—Syrians who want a civilized republic in which citizenship and consent of the governed dominate—are on their own. I’ve been so wrong so many times. One more time would be great. It would mean saving thousands of innocent lives. It would mean real support for courageous Syrian civil society activists who represent the essence of a revolution against brutality, corruption, sectarianism and unaccountability. It would mean the reclamation of American honor. It would mean preserving my near-perfect record of getting things wrong. It would be a godsend.
#2
Ah yes, now that Obama is a lame Duck, people like Hoff come out of the wood work. At the very least he should have said something during Obummer''s second run. No he's just trying to avoid a dance on the end of wire attached to a lamp post when the pooh hits the fan.
Posted by: Chaith Oppressor of the Lutherans1517 ||
10/18/2015 8:31 Comments ||
Top||
#3
Getting Champ wrong was the real crime.
Posted by: Caesar Hupomoque7314 ||
10/18/2015 23:11 Comments ||
Top||
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
[UnitedLiberty] "If Romney were president right now, the White House would be surrounded by protesters and candlelight peace vigils night and calling for impeachment, some would have pictures caricaturing the president as Hitler or an animal. They would chant "Not in our name!", or "Bring them home!", or "Hey ho, hey ho, Romney has got to go!"day. Some would wave American flags, some would wave signs 
