Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 04/19/2010 View Sun 04/18/2010 View Sat 04/17/2010 View Fri 04/16/2010 View Thu 04/15/2010 View Wed 04/14/2010 View Tue 04/13/2010
1
2010-04-19 Economy
A Third Way For Doctors - No Insurance, No Government
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by  Anonymoose 2010-04-19 10:40|| || Front Page|| [2 views ]  Top

#1 A trend whose time has come. This will accelerate as more and more docs realize that the intention behind Obamacare is to shift them from private practictioner/LPs into unionized hospital employees a la the SEIU.
Posted by lex 2010-04-19 13:42||   2010-04-19 13:42|| Front Page Top

#2 most people seem to gloss over the fact that most if not all MD's are way frickin smarter than Joe the Plumber, WAY SMARTER!
Posted by 746 2010-04-19 14:32||   2010-04-19 14:32|| Front Page Top

#3 Great article. That's how it still works in Mexico, and I have found the quality of GP care to be good there, don't know about hospitals, knock on wood.

Doctors should also remember that most of those $20 payments are going to be CASH.
Posted by bigjim-CA 2010-04-19 14:44||   2010-04-19 14:44|| Front Page Top

#4 Eliminating the billing office + the insurance vultures' take would eliminate maybe 25% of medical costs. Add in tort reform and you could cut another 8%.

Bottom line, this is a viable and attractive model for many docs and their patients. Bring it on.
Posted by lex 2010-04-19 15:43||   2010-04-19 15:43|| Front Page Top

#5 most people seem to gloss over the fact that most if not all MD's are way frickin smarter than Joe the Plumber, WAY SMARTER!

And so are licensed nurses. Look at the body of medical knowledge that a doc had in 1920 or 1940 and look at the body of medical knowledge a licensed nurse has today. Why is one a doctor and the other a nurse? Why is one only allowed to perform medical protocols within that body of knowledge and another is not? Because the medical community has operated a guild and has through the politicians imposed requirements to maintain their economic position.

Back in the late 60s, DoD was establishing a military medical college to produce doctors for the war. The AMA went to Congress and got it killed because they didn't want the system to be flooded with 'competition' and to control the number of doctors turned out into the system. Doctors didn't have those grand salaries in the 30s and 40s. Then the baby boom hit. Demand soared and the law of supply and demand hit. Doctors got 'comfortable' in the 60s and weren't about to allow their economic fortune and position decline.

When we talk about tort reform somehow the responsibility of cleaning their own house, which is usually associated with a 'profession', doesn't really get discussed. The guild (ie associations) makes sure it doesn't happen. They're looking after their own interests. We all are.

There are no innocent parties in this game. The system isn't broke because it never was whole. There's a difference between broke and sub-optimal. No one wants to trade back to care level and abilities of 1990, 1970, or 1950. However, the expectation that each is entitled to rob their neighbor blind to stay alive just a little longer hoping for immortality is going to destroy what we do have.
Posted by Procopius2k 2010-04-19 17:01||   2010-04-19 17:01|| Front Page Top

00:02 JosephMendiola
23:57 trailing wife
23:56 JosephMendiola
23:45 trailing wife
23:43 JosephMendiola
23:35 tu3031
23:28 trailing wife
23:13 Chuck Simmins
23:11 OldSpook
22:57 JosephMendiola
22:55 trailing wife
22:46 JosephMendiola
22:43 JosephMendiola
22:42 gorb
22:40 phil_b
22:39 gorb
22:35 phil_b
22:35 JosephMendiola
22:33 phil_b
22:30 JosephMendiola
22:24 Pappy
22:17 phil_b
22:10 Hotspur666
21:52 ed









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com