Hi there, !
Today Wed 10/18/2006 Tue 10/17/2006 Mon 10/16/2006 Sun 10/15/2006 Sat 10/14/2006 Fri 10/13/2006 Thu 10/12/2006 Archives
Rantburg
533615 articles and 1861742 comments are archived on Rantburg.

Today: 83 articles and 443 comments as of 19:37.
Post a news link    Post your own article   
Area: WoT Operations    Non-WoT    Opinion    Local News       
UN imposes stringent NKor sanctions
Today's Headlines
Headline Comments [Views]
Page 2: WoT Background
2 00:00 anon1 [1] 
11 00:00 Zenster [7] 
4 00:00 Zenster [1] 
8 00:00 .com [1] 
14 00:00 Nimble Spemble [] 
13 00:00 Zenster [3] 
13 00:00 Baba Tutu [3] 
10 00:00 USN,Ret [] 
18 00:00 wxjames [] 
0 [5] 
0 [] 
2 00:00 trailing wife [4] 
2 00:00 Procopius2K [] 
5 00:00 Elder of Zion [1] 
1 00:00 .com [] 
1 00:00 anon [4] 
3 00:00 Cheep yet fun [] 
0 [] 
2 00:00 Frank G [] 
3 00:00 pihkalbadger [3] 
3 00:00 SpecOp35 [4] 
16 00:00 anon [2] 
0 [7] 
0 [2] 
0 [4] 
0 [] 
0 [2] 
0 [2] 
1 00:00 anon1 [1] 
Page 1: WoT Operations
3 00:00 pihkalbadger [6]
7 00:00 Frank G []
1 00:00 john [4]
13 00:00 gromgoru [4]
5 00:00 pihkalbadger [1]
14 00:00 Phineter Thraviger1073 []
21 00:00 .com [6]
1 00:00 Besoeker []
1 00:00 Frank G []
0 []
10 00:00 Pappy [1]
0 [1]
0 []
4 00:00 Phineter Thraviger1073 [2]
0 [1]
0 [5]
0 [1]
0 [7]
1 00:00 gromgoru [2]
3 00:00 Shieldwolf []
0 [2]
2 00:00 Classical_Liberal [1]
Page 3: Non-WoT
1 00:00 twobyfour [1]
3 00:00 Zenster [4]
1 00:00 USN,Ret []
50 00:00 Zenster [3]
32 00:00 .com [1]
2 00:00 Glerelet Flaviger5433 [4]
0 []
4 00:00 Zenster []
0 []
0 [4]
0 []
Page 4: Opinion
0 [2]
0 [5]
4 00:00 Zenster [1]
0 []
2 00:00 anon []
7 00:00 djohn66 []
8 00:00 NoBeards []
20 00:00 Zenster [5]
25 00:00 .com [3]
9 00:00 Old Patriot [1]
8 00:00 xbalanke [1]
Page 5: Russia-Former Soviet Union
0 []
5 00:00 .com [4]
4 00:00 Charles [1]
2 00:00 SpecOp35 []
12 00:00 Parabellum []
1 00:00 anon []
6 00:00 bigjim-ky []
9 00:00 john [6]
4 00:00 John Blutarsky [2]
6 00:00 USN,Ret []
Afghanistan
Suicide attacks change life in Afghan capital
KABUL - Afghanistan’s drivers are some of the most fearless in the world. But a string of suicide attacks on foreign military convoys has changed all that.

Afraid of being caught up in a Taleban attack, they now slow down or veer off the road to avoid the convoys. ‘I either stop my car or basically change my route when I see the troops because of the fear of suicide attackers,’ says Mohammad Afzal, a 45-year-old taxi driver in Kabul, which has seen six suicide bombings in as many weeks in the relatively peaceful capital. ‘One gets scared and has to avoid the convoys,’ he says, waiting for passengers on an autumn day.

Fellow taxi driver Khan Mohammad says if he can’t avoid the convoy, he prays to God to forgive him and send him to paradise if he dies: ‘That is all I can do. Everybody is scared, I think.’

Another fear for many is being fired on by nervous soldiers if they get too close. The United Nations and foreign aid groups have warned their drivers to avoid military convoys. In Iraq, convoy vehicles carry signs warning drivers to keep their distance, but that is rare and of little use in largely illiterate Afghanistan.

Still not as common in Afghanistan as in Iraq, the increasing suicide attacks this year have killed about 200 people, mostly civilians, according to NTO, compared with 50-60 last year.
Posted by: Steve White || 10/15/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:


Africa North
Tunisian authorities tightens the net around bearded Algerians
Bearded and Afghan-like-dressed Algerians are being refused entry to the Tunisian territory whether as tourists or in transit to other countries even to make the small pilgrimage (Omra).
The heart bleeds... No. Wait. That's the chili kicking in again...
The people, who returned back, said that Tunisian borders guards police are controlling the frontiers tightly and scrutinizing identity papers of the Algerians as they want to cross Tunisia to go to the Saudi Arabia for pilgrimage or to other countries. Even with authentic identity papers they are not allowed to go through the borders.
Probably because authentic identity papers are such a rarity...
In such a situation, many of the bearded went through Debdab Post of Illizi to the Libyan territories.
Yeah. We'll bet the Libyans were happy to see them, too.
According to reliable sources, the Tunisian authorities resorted to such measures against bearded and Afghan-like-dressed Algerians started by the end of the tourism season in Tunisia when they noticed that out of two million Algerian tourists there were tens of bearded and Afghan-like-dressed, who could contact some of Tunisians having Islamic trends.
Bingo. Tunisia, trying to remain a civilized country, has little use for bearded fundos, especially those who like to dress up like Afghans.
The Tunisian authorities’ campaign against such behaviors and appearances, which have nothing to do with the Tunisian society’s customs, extend to include the bearded Algerians even if they were in transit to other countries.
Too bad they don't have planes and boats and such leaving for Soddy Arabia from Algiers.
They used to, didn't they? Wonder how come they don't anymore ...
The Tunisian authorities had already prevented girls from entering schools and universities wearing Islamic dresses and scarves like Afghans, which is completely odd to the Tunisian society, the same sources added.
Posted by: Fred || 10/15/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Fine, they have no problem enforcing their cultural norms. The freakin' answer is NO. Why do all western countries have any pause about the same thing? Assholes comply with societal norms or pack their asses up for the return trip. Common sense anywhere you may be.
Posted by: SpecOp35 || 10/15/2006 11:57 Comments || Top||

#2  Even with authentic identity papers they are not allowed to go through the borders

what an astounding statement to have to make
Posted by: Frank G || 10/15/2006 12:48 Comments || Top||

#3 
Posted by: Cheep yet fun || 10/15/2006 13:35 Comments || Top||


Eight opposition Islamists arrested in Egypt
CAIRO - Egyptian authorities have arrested eight members of Egypt’s strongest opposition group, the banned Muslim Brotherhood, north of Cairo in Egypt’s Nile Delta, security sources said on Saturday. The arrests were the latest government steps targeting the Islamist group whose members, elected as independents, hold 88 seats in the 454-seat parliament. The Brotherhood is officially banned in Egypt but is allowed to operate openly within limits.

Security sources said the eight Brotherhood members were arrested on Friday from their homes in the Manoufiya province, and were charged with belonging to an illegal organisation and possessing anti-government pamphlets. The Muslim Brotherhood confirmed the arrests on its Web site.

The arrests came less than a week after Egyptian authorities barred Brotherhood leader Mohamed Mahdi Akef from travelling to Saudi Arabia for a religious pilgrimage.

The Egyptian police regularly detain Brotherhood members for brief periods, often without charges. Hundreds were arrested in a crackdown following parliamentary lections held late last year. Most were later released.
Posted by: Steve White || 10/15/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Britain
Christian BA employee to take legal action over suspension for wearing cross
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 10/15/2006 07:51 || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:

#1  It was only a matter of time, this is just disgraceful. I am glad that gutsy lady is fighting BA over this one.

So many of the PC left think freedom of thought and critical thinking means criticising Christianity - then showing respect only to other religions and cultures. Criticise your own, laud others. Just asking them to quit their bigotry will be a great first step.
Posted by: anon1 || 10/15/2006 8:02 Comments || Top||

#2  So many of the PC left think freedom of thought and critical thinking means criticising Christianity - then showing respect only to other religions and cultures. Criticise your own, laud others.

I'm sorry to rant, but this is the best synthesis on PC available anywhere online IMHO, to the point this should go as a permanent "doctrine" link :
Gates of Vienna Political Correctness — The Revenge of Marxism

It also includes this ebook which was an eyes-opener for me before Fjordman put it all in a single text :
"Political Correctness:" A Short History of an Ideology
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 10/15/2006 8:12 Comments || Top||

#3  BA facing backlash in cross row The lady has supporters, I'm glad to see.
Posted by: trailing wife || 10/15/2006 8:13 Comments || Top||

#4  The airline's uniform code states that staff must not wear visible jewellery or other 'adornments' while on duty without permission from management.

It makes exceptions for Muslim and Sikh minorities by allowing them to wear hijabs and turbans.

Under rules drawn up by BA's 'diversity team' and 'uniform committee', Sikh employees can even wear the traditional iron bangle - even though this would usually be classed as jewellery - while Muslim workers are also allowed prayer breaks during work time.


She'll kick their muzzie-loving ass. Rules for one should apply to all. No exceptions, and especially no dhimmi rules
Posted by: Frank G || 10/15/2006 8:51 Comments || Top||

#5  Time to stop flying BA.
Posted by: DMFD || 10/15/2006 10:36 Comments || Top||

#6  Time to stop flying BA.

right. Besides - is it just me, or does it seem like BA should be rated in the top ten of: most likely to go down due to terrorists getting through the holes in their politically correct security.
Posted by: anon || 10/15/2006 10:42 Comments || Top||

#7  A5089,
Thanks for the links to PC Bullshit origins. Very interesting.I keep wanting to ask you who replaces all the vehicles there when the "youths" riot and stage the Carbeques ? Does each individual stand the loss? Does insurance cover it ? If insurance does, it won't be long before no one can afford it any longer ? How are these losses sustainable ?
Posted by: SpecOp35 || 10/15/2006 12:12 Comments || Top||

#8  If they lost 100 cars a day at $10,000 in value, that would be 365 million in annual losses. In the US in 2002 we lost 16.4 billion in property losses, of which 8.4 billion were stolen vehicles. I don't think the carbeques are making a financial dent yet, though they may be raising premiums in certain neighborhoods with lots of yoots, creating more uninsured motorists, Inshallah.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble || 10/15/2006 13:21 Comments || Top||

#9  A5089, that was fantastic:

for the record I reckon this is the best quote from the formidable Theodore Dalrymple.

A long article, starts with how author Naomi Klein blames Islamofascist killing sprees on "western racism", and talking about how Political Correctness and Multiculturalism is in fact cultural Marxism that seeks to completely transform Western Civilization and destroy it's roots:

(on the busting of a Muslim plot to attack Canada)
"After all, if Canadian authorities listen to the advice of their compatriot Naomi Klein, these planned mass-killings of Canadian civilians were all due to Canadian racism and because the country wasn’t Multicultural enough. Muslims want to kill Canadians, Canadians smile back, tell them how much they “respect” them and ask what more they can do to please them.

"This is what Political Correctness leads to in the end. It’s not funny and it’s not a joke. Political Correctness kills. It has already killed thousands of Western civilians, and if left unchecked it may soon kill entire nations or, in the case of Europe, entire continents.

"As I have stated before, Islam is only a secondary infection, one that we could otherwise have had the strength to withstand. Cultural Marxism has weakened the West and made us ripe for a takeover. It is cultural AIDS, eating away at our immune system until it is too weak to resist Islamic infiltration attempts. It must be destroyed, before it destroys us all." - Theodore Dalrymple


Posted by: anon1 || 10/15/2006 21:13 Comments || Top||

#10  And this is just a cracker quote also from Theodore Dalrymple:

"In Norway, a tiny Scandinavian nation that was until recently 99% white and Lutheran Christian, native Norwegians will soon be a minority in their own capital city, later in the whole country. And still, Norwegian politicians, journalists and University professors insist that there is nothing to worry about over this. Multiculturalism is nothing new, neither is immigration. In fact, our king a century ago was born in Denmark, so having a capital city dominated by Pakistanis, Kurds, Arabs and Somalis is just business as usual. The most massive transformation of the country in a thousand years, probably in recorded history, is thus treated as if it were the most natural thing in the world. To even hint that there might be something wrong about this has been immediately shouted down as “racism.”

Posted by: anon1 || 10/15/2006 21:15 Comments || Top||

#11  I wish you guys would quit bashing me, lol! Seriously, though, carry on and "rant on, dudes!"
Posted by: BA || 10/15/2006 22:00 Comments || Top||

#12  NS, the direct currency comparison doesn't work, I think. It ignores differences in wages and the cost of cars burned in France vs. stolen in the US, for one thing.

A deeper question is what the carbeques do to the residents of the area. Those that might have had jobs now have little way to get to them -- IIRC the banlieus are not well served by mass transit, although there are some stops there. Thus the economic cost of the car burnings may well include loss of wages, loss of jobs and increased social welfare payments.
Posted by: lotp || 10/15/2006 22:01 Comments || Top||

#13  Turban and hijab okay? Crucifix okay. No exceptions. No crucifix, no turban or hijab. Period. This is unequal application of the law and sheer favoritism.

A Muslim or Sikh would physically survive without wearing such garb (except if the woman was in one of those famous Islamic utopias), so it's not like their bodily well-being relies upon such apparel. It is a personal choice just like wearing a crucifix is. This is so biased and anti-Christian that it is disgusting.
Posted by: Zenster || 10/15/2006 22:55 Comments || Top||


Muslims' anger as London Olympics clash with Ramadan
You just knew it would happen, right?
The 2012 London Olympics have been plunged into controversy by the discovery that the Games will clash with Ramadan, the most holy month in the Islamic calendar.

The clash will put Muslim athletes at a disadvantage as they will be expected to fast from sunrise to sunset for the entire duration of the Games.

In 2012, Ramadan will take place from July 21 to August 20, while the Olympics run from July 27 to August 12.

An anticipated 3,000 Muslim competitors are expected to be affected.

About a quarter of the 11,099 athletes who took part in the 2004 Athens Olympics came from countries with predominantly Muslim populations.

Because the Muslim calendar is based on a lunar cycle, the ninth month of Ramadan - which runs from the appearance of one new crescent moon to the next - gets earlier by around 11 days each year.

The clash will be a huge embarrassment for Lord Coe, Culture Secretary Tessa Jowell, and London Mayor Ken Livingstone, who have been keen to ensure the Games involve all Britain's ethnic communities.

Massoud Shadjareh, chairman of the London-based Islamic Human Rights Commission, said: "They would not have organised this at Christmas. It is equally stupid to organise it at Ramadan.

"It shows a complete lack of awareness and sensitivity.

"This is going to disadvantage the athletes and alienate the Asian communities by saying they don't matter.

"It's not only going to affect the participants it's going to affect all the people who want to watch the Games.

"They won't want to travel during Ramadan and they won't want to watch sport. It's a spiritual time."

Shaykh Ibrahim Mogra, an imam on the Muslim Council of Great Britain, said: "I'm sure the athletes will seek advice from their scholars.

"They are obviously going to be at a disadvantage because other competitors will be drinking and keeping up their energy levels.

"But they are athletes and I am sure they will train their bodies to cope with this.

"A Muslim might feel it would have been nice to avoid this month but life doesn't stop for Muslims during Ramadan even though they are fasting.

"The best thing for a Muslim is to continue his or her life as normal. This is the real test."

The British Olympic Association is now planning a meeting with the organisers of London 2012 to discuss how the timing will affect UK Muslim athletes.

And Muslim countries such as Turkey are calling for the date to be changed.

Togay Bayalti, president of the National Olympic Committee of Turkey, said: "This will be difficult for Muslim athletes.

"They don't have to observe Ramadan if they are doing sport and travelling but they will have to decide whether it is important to them.

"It would be nice for the friendship of the Games if they had chosen a different date."

The International Olympics Committee insisted the Games take place some time between July 15 to August 31, giving more than a week either side of Ramadan.

IOC spokeswoman Giselle Davies said: "We give a window to the five bid cities. The host city selects the dates within that window.

"The Games bring together virtually every religion and creed. How to deal with religious clashes is up to the athletes."

Joanna Manning Cooper, spokeswoman for London 2012, said: "We did know about it when we submitted our bid and we have always believed we could find ways to accommodate it.

"We had lots of things to consider when we submitted our dates, including the fact that transport will be less crowded in the summer holiday.

"We also need 70,000 volunteers and this is the best time to find them.

"We are working with the Muslim Council of Great Britain to find ways to accommodate Ramadan during the London Games."
Suggestion: Tell them to fuck off - or deport the lot. Fucking Dhimmi wankers.
Posted by: .com || 10/15/2006 06:49 || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:

#1  hmmm... the feared Paki Basketball team may be at a disadvantage
Posted by: Frank G || 10/15/2006 9:44 Comments || Top||

#2  They don't schedule it at Christmas because it's in winter, idjit.

And there are exceptions to the fasting requirement. I'm sure some obliging imam would be happy to bless yet another one of those special dispensations -- surely athletics fits into that catch-all "promoting Muslim honor and dignity" category -- instead of asking the rest of the world to always think first of muzzie sensitivities in everything we plan, say, and do. Besides, isn't the London Super-Moskkk good enough for ya?


Oh, yeah, right, I forgot for a second there. Muslims are the master race. Silly me!
Posted by: exJAG || 10/15/2006 10:33 Comments || Top||

#3  Prediction of Tomorrow's Headlines Today:

Muslims' Offended by ...
Posted by: DMFD || 10/15/2006 10:34 Comments || Top||

#4  Don't like the Olympics being held during Rama-dama-ding-dong?

THEN DON'T GO.

Arrogant idjits.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut || 10/15/2006 11:12 Comments || Top||

#5  This isn't a matter of telling them to FO. It's a matter of getting them to put secular society ahead of religious society. One step at a time.
Posted by: Perfesser || 10/15/2006 12:03 Comments || Top||

#6  I thought they were allowed to forego the fast if there was a need. So, either the Olympics is important enough to fit the bill, or their option should be to just not go.

Either way, STFU.

Besides, the Olympics are a pagan tradition from ancient Greece; they're a re-born religious festival for the Gods of Olympus. I don't see how a devout Muslim could take part in any such thing.
Posted by: Rob Crawford || 10/15/2006 12:05 Comments || Top||

#7  Very simple answer. NO Muzzies allowed to participate. Further, Rama-dama-ding-dong will be suspended in Britain in 2012. Any further questions ?
Posted by: SpecOp35 || 10/15/2006 12:15 Comments || Top||

#8  This is pure unadulterated complete and total utter bullshit. There are exemptions and absolutions by the dozen that any amateur imam could summon up in his sleep. This is just another case of winkling out some sort of imaginary insult where none is intended. Fatwah this, you wanking whingeing assholes!

Skinless people in a sandpaper world.
Posted by: Zenster || 10/15/2006 13:17 Comments || Top||

#9  I'm so bad with names. What was it Sigfried or Freud who got his head chomped on by the tiger. You know, that tiger that that he controlled?
Posted by: anon || 10/15/2006 13:21 Comments || Top||

#10  It was Roy. Yep, my mother always told me, it's not a good idea to poke a Tiger.
Posted by: anon || 10/15/2006 13:28 Comments || Top||

#11  Yeah, my Mom said that too.
Posted by: Phil Mickelson || 10/15/2006 14:57 Comments || Top||

#12  Seems to me that NOT eating while competing is a good thing, as your tummy can get all cramped up and stuff. And since Ramadamadingdong fasts end at sundown, when many of the event do, i think its a non-issue. Except the Minimum Daily Requirement of Whining and Seething hadn't yet been met....
Posted by: USN,Ret || 10/15/2006 20:10 Comments || Top||

#13  If Allah wants Muslims to win medals, there's nothing that could stop them from succeeding. Oh, ye of little faith, why do you complain about "unfairness" if you really believe the Almighty will cover you in glory? You don't have any doubt about what side He's on, do you?

Besides, there is no evidence Mohammed ever wore shorts. That should settle it. The Olympics are unIslamic. I suggest you boycott.
Posted by: Baba Tutu || 10/15/2006 23:29 Comments || Top||


Mother is denied Pill by Muslim pharmacist
A Muslim chemist repeatedly refused a mother the "morning after" pill because of his religious beliefs.

Jo-Ann Thomas, a school crossing patrolwoman with two children, was told that even though the item was in stock she should go to her doctor for her supplies.

When she was denied the pill at a Lloyds Pharmacy near her home in Thurcroft, Rotherham, she asked why and says she was told the pharmacist was a "deeply religious Muslim".

She said: "I am a 37-year-old woman, not a daft girl who doesn't know what she's doing, and the chemist has no right to tell me whether I can or can't take the pill.

"It's my choice, not his. It's his religion, not mine. He's a dispensing chemist and his job is to dispense drugs."

A spokesman for Lloyds, which runs 1,300 UK pharmacies, apologised to Mrs Thomas for her inconvenience.

But he referred to a "conscience clause" in the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain's ethics code, saying: "It states that if supplying the morning-after pill is contrary to a pharmacist's personal, religious or moral beliefs they are entirely within their rights not to supply it."
Posted by: .com || 10/15/2006 04:39 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  If we're lucky, the Pharmacist took the pills home for his OWN wife and daughters.
Posted by: Besoeker || 10/15/2006 6:10 Comments || Top||

#2  Reminds me of the several instances of London muslim cab drivers refusing to embark blind passengers... because of the unclean guide dogs.
Cultural sensitivity is a one-way street only.
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 10/15/2006 6:50 Comments || Top||

#3  It's his religion, not mine

Yes, but his religion rules that it's superior to yours, and this becomes engrained in his behavior, if only as a cultural default hardwiring. He doesn't have to respect your choices, because his are the Holiest(Tm).
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 10/15/2006 6:52 Comments || Top||

#4  That is just disgusting but very widespread and not confined to Islamic sensibilities.

Doctors often bring their personal politics to their jobs: medical schools should make a greater effort to drum it into future doctors that they should leave their politics at home and do their jobs impartially.
Posted by: anon1 || 10/15/2006 6:53 Comments || Top||

#5  This has been happening in the US, too. I'm sympathetic up to a point with people not wanting to violate their personal beliefs, but if you can't do the job, you need to find another line of work.
Posted by: SteveS || 10/15/2006 7:24 Comments || Top||

#6  "...the pharmacist was a "deeply religious Muslim".

Not so.

A good Muslim would have invoked takiyya, handed over the drugs, and basked in the knowledge that there's one less potential infadel on which to dull the scimitar.
Posted by: Hyper || 10/15/2006 12:00 Comments || Top||

#7  I am a little bit sympathetic on this one and just for the record, I'm not against the morning after pill.

She can take her business elsewhere. In fact anyone who doesn't like that policy can take their business elsewhere. If he was working for a government funded pharmacy - I'd feel differently about this.
Posted by: anon || 10/15/2006 12:11 Comments || Top||

#8  Never set foot in this establishment again. Now that you're aware of a scumbag Muzzie there, take your trade and $ elsewhere, please.
Posted by: SpecOp35 || 10/15/2006 12:19 Comments || Top||

#9  Time to place the Islamohazard symbols outside the shop.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles in Blairistan || 10/15/2006 17:46 Comments || Top||

#10  The Washington State Pharmacist's Ass'n tried to institute a similiar thing this past year, and the state gov't actually had the balls to tell them that was not a good idea. So they backed down. I don't know what shocked me more, the druggist's arrogance, or the state actually growming a set ( or probably just borrowed some)
Posted by: USN,Ret || 10/15/2006 20:14 Comments || Top||


Veil row continues in UK
AoS note: do NOT, repeat do NOT, embed href tags in the source line. Just the straight URL, no ups, no extras.
A MUSLIM teaching assistant suspended for wearing a veil in school said the garment had never been a problem for pupils at the Heathfield Church of England Junior School in Dewsbury, West Yorkshire. Aishah Azmi said to BBC radio that pupils had "never complained" and said there had never been an issue about children having difficulty in understanding her talk through the garment.
Council sez kids complained, someone posted that some of the kids were deaf and need to see the lips move
She said many of the pupils at the school were Muslim and would have been used to seeing their mothers wearing the veil.
Many are from Non English Speaking Backgrounds. NESB kids need extra plain and simple English lessons including watching the lips move
The BBC said Kirkless Council had asked her to take off her veil in class, but she told the Today program she disputed their version of events.
well she would, wouldn't she? She'd lose otherwise
Ms Azmi said she had always been willing to take her veil off in front of children, but had refused to do so in the presence of male colleagues. A employment tribunal will consider the case.

The issue of Muslim women wearing veils was thrust into the spotlight last week when Jack Straw said Muslim women who wore full veils made community relations difficult. He said he would prefer that women did not wear them because they acted as a "visible statement of separation and difference."
All of us non-Muzzies would prefer it really. And when was the last time any of us were asked whether we wanted a big importation of Muslims? Where was the democratic choice there? Where was the referendum on changing our society? Was our culture so bad it needed changing? That's social engineering and we weren't asked.
Today about 100 Muslim protesters shouted at Straw, a former foreign secretary and now leader of the house, as he arrived to hold a surgery at his constituency in Blackburn, Lancashire.
Jack Straw for PM!
Posted by: anon1 || 10/15/2006 01:47 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Straw was "homding a surgery???"""

Translation, please.

Thank you.
Posted by: Unaise Spolump2266 || 10/15/2006 3:35 Comments || Top||

#2  Unaise Spolump2266, maybe he was excising the muzzlum cancer... at least one can dream.

I think the whole thing is odd, a mistake of sorts on Straw side, because I doubt that he'd find his spine even if he tripped over it.

Or maybe he is not particularly fond of muzzies, who in their right mind is? The diplo carrier is no longer keeping him in the required mold of professional deformation. But neither he is fond of Jews.

Dunno, the guy was for me always an epitomy of weasel.
Posted by: twobyfour || 10/15/2006 4:31 Comments || Top||

#3  Council sez kids complained, someone posted that some of the kids were deaf and need to see the lips move

Gah! This thing has taken on a life of its own. I WAS JOKING when I quipped that the kids were deaf. JOKING. Emkay?
Posted by: Zenster || 10/15/2006 4:46 Comments || Top||

#4  Zenster...lol! You are going to feel really bad when you read it as "sources say" in our esteemed MSM tomorrow.
Posted by: anon || 10/15/2006 4:57 Comments || Top||

#5  What do you mean 'in the source line'? That is greek to me.

There are too many boxes to tick and things to fill it's too complicated these days, when all you want to do is post an interesting story. I used to make the headlines the link but then someone said make it the name of the source. SO i do that and now it's the straight URL whatever that means. I'll just paste it in the story then!
Posted by: anon1 || 10/15/2006 6:41 Comments || Top||

#6  Zenster!!! And I thought you knew something extra with that deaf thing!!!
Posted by: anon1 || 10/15/2006 6:42 Comments || Top||

#7  hold a surgery at his constituency

He's at his office in his district, holding an open house for the voters to drop in and talk to him.

anon1, it took me a while to figure it out, too. The title of the article goes in the title box at the top, then the http://www. thingy goes in the space below the text box, where it says Source. You're posting some very interesting stories and comments, please don't throw up your hands over this!
Posted by: trailing wife || 10/15/2006 7:53 Comments || Top||

#8  Ohhh, thanks trailing wife, I'm glad you explained that!! All this time I thought the source box was where you put what newspaper you got it from!!

No wonder I had my knickers in a twist.

You are tops too!! Love my Rantburg, can't abandon it!
Posted by: anon1 || 10/15/2006 7:56 Comments || Top||

#9  The Source box is the place where you DO NOT, I repeat, you DO NOT put the url of the nigger worship website you're having in that other thumbnail next to the article you want to post(this is a Note to self, too).
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 10/15/2006 8:04 Comments || Top||

#10  And that goes for any other fetish, too.
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 10/15/2006 8:06 Comments || Top||

#11  I am very confused by anonymous 5089. So far today I've posted from the Daily Mail and the Daily Telegraph (well, Sunday Telegraph but same paper). And I don't really like the word 'nigger' very much because it is very racist. A person cannot help being born black white or asian and I would never criticise them for a physical characteristic over which they have no control.
I reserve my anger for stupid belief systems and backwards cultural practices that violate the rights of others, like specifically Islamofascism.

"Nigger worship?" what the hey?
thumbnail? I'm too behind the new times at Rantburg to put in thumbnails... too hard I've only just worked out the source box!!!

what are you talking about???
Posted by: anon1 || 10/15/2006 8:51 Comments || Top||

#12  Relax, this is a joke on the soul-killing fetish pr0n one can readily find on the internet, and which leaves people like me a little more dead inside every time they indulge themselves with it.
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 10/15/2006 9:09 Comments || Top||

#13  OK, i think it's high time i took my tablets and went to bed :)
Posted by: anon1 || 10/15/2006 9:10 Comments || Top||

#14  And thumbnails are the little thingies used in various web browsers, and even in IE 7 now (I think, I know them as "onglets"), to hold several webpages into a single one (you click on the thumbnail, and the webpage shows the website).
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 10/15/2006 9:11 Comments || Top||

#15  Careful, a5089, you're on the verge of giving too much information, lol.
Posted by: .com || 10/15/2006 9:28 Comments || Top||

#16  Straw should have smiled and given them the one finger salute with the comment "F**k you Muzzies and the jackasses you rode in on."
Posted by: SpecOp35 || 10/15/2006 12:23 Comments || Top||

#17  "F**k you Muzzies and the jackasses you rode in on."

Let's get one thing perfectly clear. It's camels, SpecOp35. Not jackasses, camels. Jackasses are what Muslims make out of themselves.
Posted by: Zenster || 10/15/2006 13:52 Comments || Top||

#18  Well what were they bangin in the kister on that night vision video, democrats ?
Posted by: wxjames || 10/15/2006 18:46 Comments || Top||


Muslim preacher attacked in Scotland
A Muslim preacher was hurt in an apparently religiously or racially motivated attack inside his mosque in the Scottish city of Glasgow, police, health officials and witnesses said Saturday. Imam Mohammed Shamsuddin, 53, the Bangladeshi imam at the Dawat ul Islam centre in Glasgow, was attacked Friday evening and taken to a hospital for treatment to minor injuries, health officials said. He was discharged Friday night. Witnesses said the suspect, a white man, shouted abuse at Shamsuddin before punching and kicking him with anything he could lay his hands on, including a safety deposit box and a chair.

Strathclyde Police said they were treating the attack as racially motivated. The incident comes after a suspected arson attack on a mosque last week that caused 10,000 pounds’ worth of damage. The mosque, which was established by members of the Bangladeshi community, is on the edge of the University of Glasgow campus and is used by Muslim students.

Khalid Rehman, a close family friend of the injured imam, said: “A man came into the mosque holding some stones and asked the imam something along the lines of why Allah permits people to be punished with stones.” Worshippers who had come to break their fast during the holy month of Ramazan were horrified when the man then attacked the imam, witnesses said. Tommy Sheridan, a member of the autonomous Scottish parliament, said the attack occurred because Muslims were being isolated and demonised by British politicians.
Posted by: Fred || 10/15/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I'm not sorry
Posted by: anon1 || 10/15/2006 2:01 Comments || Top||

#2  Hurray for Glasgowians!
Posted by: gromgoru || 10/15/2006 3:17 Comments || Top||

#3  The Romans couldn't conquer the Scotts. Scotts remind me the most of Americans. They will be a handful when they get ticked.
Posted by: anon || 10/15/2006 5:06 Comments || Top||

#4  Witnesses said the suspect, a white man, shouted abuse at Shamsuddin before punching and kicking him with anything he could lay his hands on, including a safety deposit box and a chair.

White men, why do the hate us?

Posted by: Besoeker || 10/15/2006 6:13 Comments || Top||

#5  It is interesting to note that the MSM has no problem identifying the race or ethnicity of a perp if'n it's a Caucasian.
Posted by: .com || 10/15/2006 6:18 Comments || Top||

#6  A black man (he's innanely sensitive too)won't get specified, a yellow(or brown) man neither(lumped into 'Asian' whether he's justifiably sensitive or not).
Posted by: Duh! || 10/15/2006 7:13 Comments || Top||

#7  Hurray for Glasgowians!

I'm confident all Glaswegians will accept your support in the context you intended, gromgoru.

“A man came into the mosque holding some stones and asked the imam something along the lines of why Allah permits people to be punished with stones.”

Anyone want to bet that imam Shamsuddin never again calls for a stoning without flinching as he does so?

[crickets]

Tommy Sheridan, a member of the autonomous Scottish parliament, said the attack occurred because Muslims were being isolated and demonised by British politicians.

Who needs "British politicians"? Muslims are quite capable of demonizing themselves and do so with disgusting regularity.
Posted by: Zenster || 10/15/2006 12:17 Comments || Top||

#8  Heh, Heh. Ya, racially motivated. Keep up the good work , ye Scots.
Posted by: SpecOp35 || 10/15/2006 13:44 Comments || Top||

#9  Scots are like the Northern Irish they take no shit from foreigners.

I wish us English were the same!!!!
Posted by: Spath Glineting5974 || 10/15/2006 14:09 Comments || Top||

#10  Scots are like the Northern Irish they take no shit from foreigners.

Although they apparently got the crap kicked out of them in Kiev recently, without putting up much of a fight.
Posted by: Uneresh Glinter1959 || 10/15/2006 17:00 Comments || Top||

#11  Way to go, Jimmy!
Posted by: SR-71 || 10/15/2006 18:09 Comments || Top||

#12  #7, Sorry.
Posted by: gromgoru || 10/15/2006 21:01 Comments || Top||

#13  A man came into the mosque holding some stones and asked the imam something along the lines of why Allah permits people to be punished with stones

McAuslan lives!

Posted by: gromgoru || 10/15/2006 21:04 Comments || Top||

#14  "shouted abuse at Shamsuddin before punching and kicking him with anything he could lay his hands on, including a safety deposit box and a chair."

A totally uncoordinated, totally unrestrained violent tantrum without logic or sense, oh merry old Glasgow.

This is prob in direct response to Kriss donald
Posted by: pihkalbadger || 10/15/2006 22:12 Comments || Top||

#15  and anon that's Scots not scotts btw. UG1959 HA HA humiliated the french and you, you just make us laugh! perhaps another coach HA!
Posted by: pihkalbadger || 10/15/2006 22:21 Comments || Top||

#16  Scots it is!
Posted by: anon || 10/15/2006 23:30 Comments || Top||


Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Human Rights Watch criticizes closure of Russian rights group
Human Rights Watch on Saturday denounced the closure of a Russian rights group that exposed abuses against civilians in Chechnya as a flagrant attempt to muzzle criticism. The highest court in central Russia's Nizhny Novgorod region on Friday satisfied prosecutors' request to shut down
The Russian-Chechen Friendship Society had campaigned against the more than decade-old conflict against separatists in Chechnya and published reports alleging torture, abductions and murder of civilians...
the Russian-Chechen Friendship Society, which had campaigned against the more than decade-old conflict against separatists in Chechnya and published reports alleging torture, abductions and murder of civilians by Russian forces and their pro-Moscow Chechen allies.

New York-based Human Rights Watch said in a statement Saturday that the court's decision represented a "blatant attempt to silence a strong critic of human rights abuses in Chechnya."

"Russia's actions to quash the Russian-Chechen Friendship Society fly in the face of international standards protecting civil society," Holly Cartner, Europe and Central Asia director at Human Rights Watch, said in the statement. "The Russian government has moved to systematically eviscerate all checks on its power and civil society is its latest target."

Cartner urged Moscow's international partners, particularly the European Union, to speak against official harassment and intimidation of rights activists in Russia. The Russian-Chechen Friendship Society successfully fought off an attempt to close it last year and has faced increasing pressure from the authorities in recent months. In February, its director Stanislav Dmitryievsky was convicted of inciting ethnic hatred and given a two-year suspended sentence.
Posted by: Fred || 10/15/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:

#1 
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy || 10/15/2006 20:18 Comments || Top||

#2  I haven't seen you in a while, Atomic Conspiracy. Have your students been keeping you to busy to visit us?
Posted by: trailing wife || 10/15/2006 23:19 Comments || Top||


China-Japan-Koreas
UN Positive Sanctions Aim to Catch Kim Doing Good
by Scott Ott

(2006-10-14) — The United Nations Security Council, which has maintained peace around the globe for six decades, today stood poised to approve “positive sanctions” on North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Il aimed encouraging him when he acts appropriately.

“We need to catch him doing something right,” said Wang Guangya, the Chinese ambassador to the U.N., “and then we can shower him with affirmation to reinforce the good behavior. This is much more constructive than punitive sanctions which only make Mr. Kim feel bad, and reinforce his negative self-talk, causing him to act out again.”

The resolution, drafted by Russia and China, in response to last week’s North Korean nuclear bomb detonation, calls for deploying UN troops to monitor President Kim’s broadcasts and public appearances, looking for tell-tale signs of good behavior.

In the early phases, the UN will issue resolutions praising President Kim each time he makes a speech that does not call for turning the United States into a lake of fire, or when a month goes by without major North Korean military maneuvers, nuclear weapon tests or other provocative acts.

The draft resolution notes that “all of us at the U.N. look forward to the day when we can give President Kim a big smiley-face sticker, because he’s realized that you can’t hug your friends with nuclear arms.”
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC || 10/15/2006 11:32 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Scrappleface Alert
Posted by: Frank G || 10/15/2006 17:12 Comments || Top||

#2  That's hilarious!!
Posted by: anon1 || 10/15/2006 21:19 Comments || Top||


Ban Ki-Moon: Rice Should Talk with North Korea
Oct. 15, 2006 — - U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice should have diplomatic talks with North Korea, U.N. Secretary-General-Designate Ban Ki-moon told Bill Weir on Sunday's "Good Morning America Weekend Edition." "If possible it would be a good opportunity," he said. "The United States has expressed on many occasions that they will be prepared to talk with North Korea if and when they return to six party talks. ... I hope North Korea will take this opportunity to discuss all their concerns."

The United Nations Security Council unanimously passed a resolution Saturday that will impose harsh sanctions against North Korea just six days after Kim Jong Il's rogue regime declared that it conducted an underground nuclear test. The Security Council said the North Korean test amounted to a "clear threat to international peace and security."

Immediately after the vote, North Korean Ambassador Pak Gil Yon addressed the Council and rejected the U.N. vote, calling it a "gangster-like action."
And no one knows more about gangster-like actions than the Norks.
"This clearly shows the Security Council has completely lost its impartiality," he said, "as it persists in applying double standards in its work."

"This is very much regrettable that North Korea declared the rejection," Ban Ki-moon said Sunday. The foreign minister said he "hopes North Korea will comply fully to [the] resolutions."

Continued on Page 49
Posted by: john || 10/15/2006 10:09 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Clone of Kofi?
Posted by: john || 10/15/2006 10:25 Comments || Top||

#2  "[Kim Jong Il] is in control of all of North Korean society," he said. "The problem is that we have to talk to him kill him and his gang of thugs."

There - fixed that for ya!
Posted by: CrazyFool || 10/15/2006 10:41 Comments || Top||

#3  "Rice Should Talk with North Korea"

And say, "FOAD."
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut || 10/15/2006 11:09 Comments || Top||

#4  Not even a damned peep from Rice. Unless they're the Korben Dallas type, bilateral negotiations represent a concession to North Korea. All they should look forward to is having their ships boarded at sea and a long miserable winter.
Posted by: Zenster || 10/15/2006 12:02 Comments || Top||

#5  Picking up where Mr. Kofi Asshole left off
Posted by: Captain America || 10/15/2006 13:31 Comments || Top||

#6  I nominate former Sec. Albright w/ the derringer. (in the drawing room)
" It's for your country Maddie".
Posted by: Glineck Javimble1746 || 10/15/2006 15:54 Comments || Top||

#7  The United States has expressed on many occasions that they will be prepared to talk with North Korea if and when they return to six party talks. ...

Fine, Mr. Bark-At-Moon. If and when the NorKs return to the 6-party talks, we'll be there. Just do not expect any kind of concession to get them there, or any easing of our terms. In fact, we should probably say "because of your intrangience, we will no longer consider XXXXX." Of course, that depends on not getting liberals in power.
Posted by: Jackal || 10/15/2006 21:17 Comments || Top||

#8  Amen, Jackal. The disingenuous BS of the Dhimmis, though predictable, is still amazing.

There is nothing left regards NorK except collapse and absorption by those who deserve the grief that will create - or obliteration, then absorption of the remnants.
Posted by: .com || 10/15/2006 22:06 Comments || Top||


N. Korea gave Iran missile technology
Foreign Ministry sources said Saturday that North Korea was transferring equipment and technology to Iran that can be used to produce missiles, Israel Radio reported. Israel welcomed the UN Security Council's decision Saturday to impose sanctions on North Korea. Senior officials in Jerusalem said that Israel saw the decision as a "step in the right direction" in the effort to prevent nuclear weapons proliferation.
Posted by: Fred || 10/15/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Well, we can hope so, anyway.
Posted by: .com || 10/15/2006 0:18 Comments || Top||


S. Korea seeks proof on weapons test
South Korea's nuclear agency said Saturday it is still seeking confirmation of whether a North Korean weapon test was nuclear, despite US findings showing consistencies with an atomic blast. South Korea's government-affiliated Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety would not comment on the US findings, released Friday, that indicate a sample of air taken after Monday's test contained radioactive debris consistent with an atomic explosion.

South Korean monitoring has so far detected no abnormal levels of radioactivity in South Korean air or rainwater...
The agency is currently studying seawater samples collected off South Korea's east coast to seek separate signs of abnormal radioactivity from North Korea, institute official Han Seung-jae said. Results are expected next week. South Korean monitoring has so far detected no abnormal levels of radioactivity in South Korean air or rainwater, but officials have cautioned the findings do not indicate North Korea did not conduct a nuclear test or that a nuclear test had failed.

A US government official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, cautioned that the administration has not made a definitive conclusion about the nature of the explosion. "The betting is that this was an attempt at a nuclear test that failed," the official said. "We don't think they were trying to fake a nuclear test, but it may have been a nuclear fizzle - an effort that failed." The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the information.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Fred || 10/15/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I tole you I 'spoded the bomb, imperearist rackeys! I am Dear Reader, Kim Jong Ir! It was no dud, it was a grorious esprosion rereasing the power of the universe and irruminating the frawress achivement of my irrustrious peoper! My peoper rove me, you wirr rove me too, verry soon!
Posted by: .com || 10/15/2006 0:25 Comments || Top||

#2  I suppose if we all pretend it wasn't nuclear after all then we don't have to take any action... we can stick with the sunshine policy... where's Madeleine Aldim and her basketball when we need her?
Posted by: anon1 || 10/15/2006 1:36 Comments || Top||

#3  I'm assuming it was a fizzle, but the attempt was there. 'tɕutɕʰe' or Juche Sasang, doesn't account for the total dependance nk has on the chinese. Europe, Namerica, SKOR, n japon have to step up. The Chinese dont want millions of desperately hungry nk people swamping the border.
Posted by: pihkalbadger || 10/15/2006 22:48 Comments || Top||


North Korea totally rejects UN sanctions
UNITED NATIONS - North Korea on Saturday said it “totally rejects” UN sanctions imposed after it declared it had conducted a nuclear test, accusing the world body of “double standards”.

“This clearly testifies that the Security Council has completely lost its impartiality and still persists in applying double standards in its work...”
“This clearly testifies that the Security Council has completely lost its impartiality and still persists in applying double standards in its work,” ambassador Pak Gil Yon told the Security Council. “It is gangster-like for the Security Council to have adopted today a coercive resolution while neglecting the nuclear threat and moves for sanctions and pressure of the United States,” he added.

He further accused the United States of preparing a pre-emptive strike on his country.
We're always preparing one, you know.
Posted by: Steve White || 10/15/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  You really need to get that surprise meter fixed you know, it's been broken a long time now!

Can someone please post some of the hilarious rantings that must be coming out of KCNA?

Some vintage Rodung Shinbum might be in order.

I'm sure some 'sea of fire' rants have been issued...
Posted by: anon1 || 10/15/2006 2:04 Comments || Top||


Great White North
CBC says mole helped Canada uncover al Qaeda plot
A young Canadian of Egyptian origin acted as a mole to help authorities unravel an alleged al Qaeda-inspired plot to bomb buildings in downtown Toronto, CBC television said on Friday.

CBC, in a report carried on its Web site and on its evening news program, said the young agricultural engineer was now part of a witness protection program. "He really felt, as a loyal Muslim Canadian, like he owed Canada something," a former associate told the program. "And it's not surprising to see that he did that for the cause of Canada."
I'm surprised the CBC didn't run his name, photo and last known address.
CBC said the man, who is in his 20s, had helped police because he wanted to prevent a "civilian calamity." It said he was the second mole in the alleged plot.
CBC said the man, who is in his 20s, had helped police because he wanted to prevent a "civilian calamity." It said he was the second mole in the alleged plot.

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police arrested a group of Canadian Muslims in June and has charged them with a variety of terrorism-related offenses, including plotting to build a truck bomb larger than that used in the Oklahoma City bombing of 1995 and setting up a terrorist training camp. Police said the group, which included both adults and teenagers, had acquired three ton of what they believed was ammonium nitrate, as well as other bomb-making equipment. Some of the younger suspects have been granted bail, but others are in jail ahead of what is likely to be a long series of preliminary court hearings followed by a prolonged trial.

There have been no al Qaeda-inspired attacks in Canada, although security officials have frequently warned that Canada must not be complacent about the risk of an attack. Canada declined to join the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq, but Canadian troops are fighting the Taliban in Afghanistan, raising the country's profile in the Muslim world.
Posted by: Fred || 10/15/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  why in the hell would you give someone bail after they where going too build a truck bomb bigger than the one in OLKLAHOMA CITY?
Posted by: sinse || 10/15/2006 9:23 Comments || Top||

#2  A young Canadian of Egyptian origin

Member of the invisible Moderate Muslims? Or a Coptic?
Posted by: Procopius2K || 10/15/2006 9:58 Comments || Top||


Home Front: Politix
Kerry Bashes Bush, Immerses in his Kool-Aid
MANCHESTER, N.H. -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) barely said hello to the New Hampshire Democrats who filled a banquet room here Friday night before unloading on President Bush. "This war in Iraq is a disgrace," he said in the second sentence of his speech at a party fundraising dinner.

Thirty-two minutes and 14 standing ovations later, the man who lost the 2004 presidential campaign left little doubt that if he runs again in 2008, he intends to be the chief prosecutor of the record of the Bush presidency. "A lie, a lie, a lie and a lie," he said after recounting Republican claims that Iraq is not in a civil war, that North Korea's nuclear advancement is former president Bill Clinton's fault and that Democrats were behind the release of salacious e-mails that Mark Foley sent to former House pages.

It was as if the Kerry of 2006 was channeling the Howard Dean of 2003. "What we have in Washington is a house of lies, and in November, we need to clean house," he said.

Kerry spoke to an audience that included many of the activists who helped propel him to the nomination two years ago. But after Bush's victory, many of them are decidedly cooler to a Kerry presidential campaign in 2008.

The University of New Hampshire released a survey Thursday of presidential preferences in the Granite State. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) led the field of Democrats with 30 percent, followed by former senator John Edwards (N.C.) at 16 percent and former vice president Al Gore at 10 percent. Kerry ranked fourth with 9 percent. None of this seems to discourage the Massachusetts senator. He said he has been getting a far different sense from conversations with Democrats during his travels this fall. "I'm very encouraged," he said in an interview a few hours before his speech. "I know what the conventional wisdom is, and it's had a good record of being wrong."

Kerry believes he was defeated in 2004 in large part because of what he calls two lies from his opponents: one about the way America went to war in 2003, the other far more personal -- the Swift Boat veterans' attacks that challenged his Vietnam War record, crippling his campaign in August 2004. Democrats still fault Kerry for failing to fight back against those charges, and he says he regrets that he was not more aggressive. "We thought the truth was understood," he said. "We should have done more." But, Kerry added: "I don't think that should disqualify you from being president of the United States, necessarily."

What is disqualifying, he believes, is the Bush administration's Iraq strategy. "This war is utterly disastrous," he said. "It's without parallel in modern American foreign policy history in the incompetence and in the lack of effort to bring elders of both parties together and create an atmosphere of solving it. And I am incensed that young Americans are losing their lives because these guys are arrogant and incompetent."

Those kinds of comments have drawn instant rebukes from critics in the Republican Party, and even Democrats have been reluctant to follow Kerry's recommendations for changing policy by setting a timetable for withdrawing U.S. forces. He predicts that more of his colleagues in the Senate will move his way after the midterm elections.

Kerry said those who have encouraged him to run again believe he can be a viable candidate. "Are there enough people who believe that?" he asked. "Can we put that together? Have I learned the lessons of getting kicked on my butt and dusted up, and can I bring a better experience to the table? I think I've learned a lot of lessons. The question is, can you convey that to people? I don't know. Those are the imponderables."
Posted by: Bobby || 10/15/2006 08:01 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Please do run again, Senator Kerry. And don't skimp on your campaign spending. It will be so illuminating for those who didn't see you properly the last time around!
Posted by: trailing wife || 10/15/2006 8:27 Comments || Top||

#2  Indeed - so illuminating that his fellow Vietnam vets will want to highlight his service record and his actions during that time.
Posted by: lotp || 10/15/2006 8:42 Comments || Top||

#3  release ALL your records, Senator. Every day you delay and obfuscate proves you're a self-puffed lying sack of sh*t
Posted by: Frank G || 10/15/2006 9:09 Comments || Top||

#4  It's without parallel in modern American foreign policy history in the incompetence and in the lack of effort to bring elders of both parties together and create an atmosphere of solving it.

And your part, Senator? You are helping to bring the elders of both parties together ... how?

Run.

Run as fast as you will
Escape if you can
You are the quarry
Fate is the hunter

H.T - Ernest K. Gann, Fate is the Hunter
Posted by: Bobby || 10/15/2006 9:31 Comments || Top||

#5  If I were President, nothing bad would be happening. Only good things would be happening. Bad things are happening because of this administration. This administration causes bad things to happen. I would do everything better and smarter. Because I am better and smarter. This administration is not better and smarter. Vote for me in 2008.
Posted by: John Kerry || 10/15/2006 10:29 Comments || Top||

#6  "A lie, a lie, a lie and a lie,"

Great campaign theme there, Captain Hairdo...
Posted by: Raj || 10/15/2006 10:31 Comments || Top||

#7  No Prince Horseface - young men are dying because you and your treasonous friends (Murtha, Kennedy, Shithan, etc...) keep shooting them in the knees when you should be supporting them.
Posted by: CrazyFool || 10/15/2006 10:37 Comments || Top||

#8  #% LOL -- well said, JFnK.

Posted by: Matt || 10/15/2006 10:39 Comments || Top||

#9  good post on another blog: John Kerry: Liar or Ignoramus?
Posted by: Frank G || 10/15/2006 10:55 Comments || Top||

#10  If Kerry runs again (hahahahaha), he will be surprised to find that most of his suport came from people voting against Bush, not for Kerry.

And here's a hint: if you decide to run as a war hero, pick a war that isn't three decades in the past where you didn't do anything particularly heroic. Don't flaunt medals for being wounded when you didn't spend a day in the hospital. Better to run on your career accomplishments however small they may be.
Posted by: SteveS || 10/15/2006 15:25 Comments || Top||

#11  Kerry runs again (hahahahaha),
Posted by: anon || 10/15/2006 15:30 Comments || Top||

#12  "Don't flaunt medals for being wounded when you didn't spend a day in the hospital"

That's damn right. The real heroes of Vietnam (and I include those names on the wall) DESPISE this lying, self-aggrandizing ass. Oh dear, I hope he runs again. He says he won't give the Swift Boat Vets a chance to attack him this time. Oh yeah? You watch John. You owe EVERY SINGLE PERSON who has worn the uniform in a time of war an APOLOGY. Try stopping the voices John. There's only about 20 million or so.
Posted by: mcsegeek1 || 10/15/2006 17:18 Comments || Top||

#13  Oh, and as long as I'm in a ranting mood, one more thing, John. If I had 3 wishes, one of them would be to resurrect General George S. Patton and have him kick the ever living sh*t out of you.
Posted by: mcsegeek1 || 10/15/2006 17:20 Comments || Top||

#14  Oh, and as long as I'm in a ranting mood, one more thing, John.

MSG, for a moment I thought you meant our reverred South Asia Desk and I thought, "Oh no, Macs lost it."
Posted by: Nimble Spemble || 10/15/2006 17:40 Comments || Top||


India-Pakistan
The Taliban's Waziristan Accord: Musharraf Blinked!
The Pakistani Press exposes the Waziristan Accord as an agreement between the government and the Taliban

While Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf and a host of government functionaries continue to claim the Waziristan Accord was an agreement with the tribes that will further peace in the tribal regions, the Pakistani press continually refutes the government line. Dawn, the Pakistani newspaper that provided the details of the Waziristan Accord, digs deeper and discovers the agreement was indeed between the Taliban and the government. The tribes were essentially sidelined.

The deal was signed with militants and not with tribal elders, as is being officially claimed. The signatories are the two principal parties to the conflict: (a) the administrator of North Waziristan as the government representative, and (b) militants and clerics who until September 5 were on the wanted list. Among them are Hafiz Gul Bahadar, Maulana Sadiq Noor, Azad Khan, Maulvi Saifullah, Maulvi Ahmad Shah Jehan, Azmat Ali, Hafiz Amir Hamza and Mir Sharaf.

The first two in the list are top militant [or Taliban] clerics and the remaining six were nominated by them to co-sign the agreement, sources say, adding that they were all pardoned by the government subsequent to the deal. The agreement identifies them as ‘fareeq-e-doum’ (second party). As the names indicate, no tribal elder from the Utmanzai tribe was among the signatories, as claimed by the government. The 45-member inter-tribal jirga handpicked and nominated by Governor Ali Muhammad Jan Aurakzai countersigned the document as the interlocutors. Period.

Governor Jan Aurakzai [or Orakzai] is a known Taliban sympathizer and is a proponent of expanding the terms of the Waziristan Accord throughout the tribal agencies.

On September 5, we noted that senior Taliban commander Jalaluddin Haqqani and Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan leader Tahir Yuldashev were present at the signing. On September 23, we noted that major Taliban and al-Qaeda leaders, including members of the Central Shura, fully backed the Waziristan Accord.

Dawn goes on to document the violations of the truce, items we've documented here since its signing: the continuation of targeted assassinations, the presence of 'foreigners' in the region, the absence of Pakistani troops, the rise in crime and the existence of two Taliban offices in Miramshah. The Taliban themselves mentions ten offices in the note pinned on the chest of an assassinated "spy."

The Friday Times of Lahore took a trip to Miramshah and discovered the Taliban have near total control of the city. Iqbal Khattak describes the scene:

Markets were open, streets were full of people and many long-haired people known as the 'Taliban' were patrolling the bazaar in 4x4 SSR jeeps and on foot, brandishing Kalashnikov, rifles and other weapons. Vehicles were leaving from the general bus stand in all directions and trailers were bringing different commodity items into the bazaar and carrying exports goods to Afghanistan through the Ghulam Khan check-post. There are few signs of government presence, however. All check-posts have been vacated and paramilitary jawans are almost gone except at one or two places. The military is back to the barracks. I only saw two tribal policemen at one place near the Dattakhel bus stand.

The local view is the Taliban have gained the upper hand in signing the "truce." "The Taliban have emerged victorious from the accord. Whatever demands they put on the table were met (by the government)," said Pehlawan Malik Mir Kazim, an elder in a town near Miramshah. "This is the general perception among the people here." Kazim refutes the claims the Waziristan Accord was designed to counter the Taliban. "If that were true the Taliban would not be moving around openly without any fear of the government," said Kazim.

The militants are clearly triumphant and enjoying the freedom of movement the accord has afforded them. As one 22-year old militant Bismillah Khan put it: "It is great to move around without fear of encountering the troops." Former FATA security chief Brig. (Retd), Mehmood Shah said the accord gave the Taliban complete freedom of movement and the "chances of presence [sic] of high value targets" must have grown following the government's lifting of travel restrictions on militants. The Taliban look fresh, their hair well-oiled. "They were mostly battle-fatigued and dust covered when they were fighting the troops and moving constantly from one place to another," Rasool Khan, a chemist near the agency headquarters hospital, told TFT.

This has far-reaching implications. The Taliban and al-Qaeda have a safe haven in every sense of the word. They are no longer the tired, hunted fugitives concerned about the Pakistani Army. Their energies can now be directed from survival to current and future operations. The Pakistani government has not ceded authority over the tribal agencies, only control. Musharraf has repeatedly stated cross border raids from U.S. and NATO forces would be unacceptable violations of Pakistan's sovereignty. The Taliban and al-Qaeda have openly established training camps and are recruiting, arming and training fighters, and sortieing them into Afghanistan, within Pakistan, and beyond
. How can you violate sovereinty that does not exist?

By Bill Roggio
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC || 10/15/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [5 views] Top|| File under:


170 Afghans arrested in crackdown after 'mysterious' blasts
PESHAWAR: Police are cracking down on Afghan refugees in Peshawar and they have arrested over 170 Afghans for their alleged involvement in various crimes. The NWFP government has also started a refugee registration drive in the province with the help of the National Database Registration Authority (NADRA) from today (Sunday). The government has asked all the Afghan refugees to register themselves before December 31, otherwise, their stay in Pakistan would be considered illegal and action will be taken against them.

“The arrests came after four bomb blasts in different parts of Peshawar in a few weeks,” police sources said on Saturday. The police have arrested over 170 suspected Afghans from urban, suburban and rural localities of Peshawar city to check the rising number of kidnappings, car lifting incidents and robberies, police sources said.

A majority of the detained refugees have been charged with 14 Foreigners Act. Police said that after initial investigations, they had deported 40 of the detained men who were involved in criminal activities. The police officials said the arrested refugees, who had no criminal record were charged with sections 55 and 109 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC).
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Fred || 10/15/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [7 views] Top|| File under:


India will burn if rebel hanged says Kashmiri leader
NEW DELHI - India will “go up in flames” if it hangs a Muslim militant convicted for his role in an attack on parliament in 2001, a former chief minister of Indian Kashmir was quoted as saying.

Last month a New Delhi court set October 20 as the date for the hanging of Kashmiri Mohammed Afzal, triggering violent protests in Indian Kashmir, India’s only Muslim-majority state.

“You want to hang him? Go ahead and hang him ..."
Okay, don't mind if we do.
"... this nation will go up in flames because the terrorists will do things which will destroy the relationship of the Hindus and Muslims here,” Farooq Abdullah told CNN-IBN TV news. “Kashmir will anyway go up in flames ... there will (also) be turmoil which India will have to face. I am telling you.”
The feared Kashmiri street will erupt!
Abdullah, a senior Kashmiri politician whose pro-India National Conference party has often ruled the state, was speaking in an interview to be telecast on Sunday, excerpts of which were released by the channel on Saturday.

Afzal was sentenced to death for his role in the attack when five gunmen stormed the parliament complex. The gunmen were all shot dead. Kashmiri leaders have said hanging Afzal would fuel a Muslim separatist revolt in Indian Kashmir that has killed more than 45,000 people since 1989. “You will be making him a hero for centuries to come ... you are giving a massive weapon to the separatists in the state of Jammu and Kashmir,” Abdullah told CNN-IBN.
He'll also be dead so he won't be planning any more terrorist missions.
It is not clear if the hanging will be carried out on the set date as the president considers the clemency plea.
Posted by: Steve White || 10/15/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:


Iraq
Al Qaeda demands Sunni Islamic state
That Iraq will split into three, is now beyond doubt.
AN Iraqi militant group led by al Qaeda has called for a separate Islamic state in Baghdad and other areas with a large Sunni Arab population, according to a video posted on the Internet today.

"Your brothers in the Mutayibeen Coalition herald the establishment of the Islamic State of Iraq ... to protect our religion and our people, to prevent strife and so that the blood and sacrifices of your martyrs are not lost," a speaker for the coalition said on the video.

The Sunni insurgent coalition was set up last week by the al Qaeda-led Mujahideen Shura Council, smaller groups and unnamed tribal leaders. It was named after an historic coalition formed to unite a major Arab tribe.

The speaker, whose face was blotted out on the video, said the Islamic state should include Baghdad, the provinces of Anbar, Diyala, Kirkuk, Salahedddin, Nineveh and parts of Babel and Wasit. Iraq has 18 provinces.

He said the move to announce the Islamic state came after "the Kurds secured a northern state and a federal state was approved for the rejectionists (Shiite Muslims) in the centre and the south".

Iraq's parliament on Wednesday approved a law that sets out the mechanics of forming federal regions, an issue Sunni minority leaders fear might tear the country apart in sectarian civil war. The session was boycotted by the largest political bloc of the Sunni minority.

The video's authenticity could not be verified but it was posted on a main web site often used by insurgent groups.

The Mujahideen Shura Council, an umbrella group led by Iraq's branch of al Qaeda, frequently claims responsibility for attacks against U.S.-led forces and the Shiite-led Baghdad government.
Posted by: tipper || 10/15/2006 11:06 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I don't know how I feel about this. A federation comprised of three provinces or states would have been a real benefit to them all. It would have made the country much stronger and powerful. It would have forced a government that was somewhat secular and thus forced a bit of separation between church and state. Additionally, they would have a united Iraq to make it more difficult for their neighbors to stir up trouble on their borders.

But then.... these guys really don't grasp that whole "working together for a mutual benefit" thingy. So maybe it's best. Like I said the other day - if I were the Sunnis I'd eek out some important concessions and take it. They have enough brains and know how to make a patch of sand into a pretty good place. Kurds have already shown they can govern. As for the Shia - I don't know enough to make predictions about their fate.
Posted by: anon || 10/15/2006 11:23 Comments || Top||

#2  Men who have to hide their faces do not decide the fate of nations.
Posted by: Grunter || 10/15/2006 13:28 Comments || Top||

#3  We should have eliminated Sunnis during initial attacks. Now its being done daily by Shia. Note 46 new bodies strewn about today. Sunnis day in Iraqi sun is done. They see it coming, but continue threats and outrages in hopes that they can continue control by intimidation. Train has left the station. Sunnis will either leave or be eliminated.
Posted by: SpecOp35 || 10/15/2006 13:52 Comments || Top||

#4  The sunnis deserve exactly squat. I oppose partitioning Iraq solely on the basis that the Middle East will likely require numerous such similar federations to ever establish peaceful governments where so many dictatorships and theocracies once existed.
Posted by: Zenster || 10/15/2006 20:24 Comments || Top||


Iraqi Police Force Facing Shake-Up
BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) - Iraq's Shiite-dominated Interior Ministry, whose police forces have been accused of complicity in sectarian attacks, has fired 3,000 employees accused of corruption or rights abuses and will change top commanders, a spokesman said Saturday.

Thousands have died this year in the cycle of killings between Shiite and Sunni death squads. At least 22 were killed Saturday, mainly in sectarian attacks. Amid the growing tensions between Sunni Arabs and Shiites, Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah met Saturday with prominent Iraqi clerics from both sects in the Islamic holy city of Mecca and urged them to seek an end to the violence to allow the two sides to reconcile. "My brothers, we need now patience, calmness and quiet to get to know each other," the king told them.

Spokesman Abdul-Karim Khalaf said the Interior Ministry shake-up would ensure stronger action to stop the violence. "We are working on reshuffling the ministry's vital posts like (the leaders of the) police commandos and public order forces, as well as some undersecretaries," he told The Associated Press, without elaborating. He said most of the 3,000 employees who had been removed since May were suspected of corruption or human rights violations, but did not specify whether they were involved in militia activities. Up to 600 of them will face prosecution, he said.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Steve White || 10/15/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:


Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Hamas: US trying to topple our gov't
Hamas reacted strongly to reports over the weekend that the US was planning to allocate millions of dollars to support Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas and his Fatah party. Hamas leaders accused the US of meddling in Palestinians' internal affairs by seeking to overthrow the Hamas-led government.

PA and Fatah officials, on the other hand, expressed concern that the reports would damage the credibility of Abbas and make him appear to be a "collaborator" with the US and Israel. Although they denied the reports when speaking on the record, some officials said Washington was already providing financial aid to opponents of the PA government.
Posted by: Fred || 10/15/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  PA and Fatah officials, on the other hand, expressed concern that the reports would damage the credibility of Abbas and make him appear to be a "collaborator" with the US and Israel.

What a great idea! Let's get all of these worthless fucks killed right away.
Posted by: Zenster || 10/15/2006 3:31 Comments || Top||

#2  If I were Shin Beth, I would "leak" names of "collaborators" on daily basis. People would be surprised how high on the leadersip roster the collaborators are positioned.

[wink]
Posted by: twobyfour || 10/15/2006 4:38 Comments || Top||

#3  WHAT "government"?
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut || 10/15/2006 11:15 Comments || Top||

#4  You have a Government?

Prove it, Govern.

Posted by: Redneck Jim || 10/15/2006 11:19 Comments || Top||

#5  2X4
If I were the Shin Beth I would deposit $100,000 in cash into the bank account of Ismail Hania and 30 other Hamas "parliament members" and send the receipts to the Fatah headquarters and invest heavily in Popcorn manufacturer's stock.
Posted by: Elder of Zion || 10/15/2006 11:49 Comments || Top||


Suleiman, Mashaal discuss Shalit's fate
Egypt's intelligence director held talks Saturday in Damascus with Hamas' political chief Khaled Mashaal on forming a Palestinian unity government and swapping prisoners for kidnapped soldier Gilad Shalit, a Hamas official said. Mashaal met with Omar Suleiman about containing the conflict between the ruling Hamas and Fatah party, Hamas official Osama Hamdan said in a telephone interview from Lebanon.

On Friday, Mashaal said Hamas would not recognize Israel, but it wants to join a national unity government with Abbas' rival Fatah faction.
The talks came amid tension that has lead to violent street clashes in the Palestinian territories between Hamas and its rival Fatah. Fatah's leader, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, has advocated recognizing Israel in exchange for a Palestinian state on parts of the West Bank and Gaza. Hamas has refused, and talks over forming a power-sharing government have stalled over the issue. On Friday, Mashaal said Hamas would not recognize Israel, but it wants to join a national unity government with Abbas' rival Fatah faction.

He also said Hamas was ready to swap Cpl. Shalit for Palestinian prisoners. Also Saturday, Palestinian Interior Minister Said Siyam and his Syrian counterpart Gen. Bassam Abdul-Majid met in Damascus to discuss the Palestinian situation. Farouk Kaddoumi, the head of the Palestine Liberation Organization's political wing, also met with Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem, the official Syrian news agency, SANA, reported.

Recognition of Israel is a major demand by the US and EU for lifting sanction on Hamas, which were imposed after Hamas defeated Fatah in the January legislative elections.
Posted by: Fred || 10/15/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Anti-tank missiles smuggled into Gaza
The IDF released information Friday that indicated the pace of weapons smuggling into the Gaza Strip was increasing. A senior army officer said terror groups were arming at an "unprecedented" pace, Channel 2 reported, and some officials were calling for a re-evaluation of the IDF's strategy in Gaza. Despite intense IDF activity along the security fence in recent days and non-stop air strikes on Gaza weapons depots,
Terror groups have been importing more than two tons of TNT per month through tunnels burrowed under the Philadelphi corridor along the Egyptian border.
terror groups have been importing more than two tons of TNT per month through tunnels burrowed under the Philadelphi corridor along the Egyptian border.

Aside from the usual merchandise of explosives, light weapons and ammunition, some 20 advanced anti-tank missiles have found their way into Gaza - a development the IDF has feared since the end of the war in Lebanon, officials said. Several anti-tank missiles have been fired at troops and vehicles in the army's latest forays across the security fence. In two separate incidents Friday, Palestinians targeted tanks operating in Khan Yunis, but failed to inflict casualties.

Shin Bet head Yuval Diskin warned in July that the situation in Gaza could in two to three years be similar to what Israel faced in Lebanon if significant changes were not made on the ground. Diskin emphasized the need to block the smuggling routes into Gaza and said Palestinian terror groups could try to emulate the model of guerilla warfare employed by Hizbullah. Many of the casualties suffered by the IDF in Lebanon were inflicted by anti-tank missiles.
Posted by: Fred || 10/15/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Monkey see, monkey do.
Posted by: SpecOp35 || 10/15/2006 13:56 Comments || Top||

#2  memo to: Egypt

From: the U.S.

Knock this shit off or your $2 Billion dollars go to the Jooooos
Posted by: Frank G || 10/15/2006 14:50 Comments || Top||


Science & Technology
Official: Swiss Banks Broke Privacy Law
BERN, Switzerland (AP) -- Swiss banks violated the law by passing banking information on to the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, the country's top data protection official said Friday. The banks, usually known for safeguarding the privacy of their clients, should have informed customers making international money transfers via the Belgium-based SWIFT money-transfer service that their data could be passed on to third parties, Hanspeter Thuer said.
A small pamphlet with 5 point type would work; that's what my bank does.
Just the possibility of the data being leaked should have been grounds enough to warn customers, he said.
Let us know Osama's address and we'll notify him with a JDAM Airmail Special Delivery Message.
After the Sept. 11 attacks, SWIFT largely complied with U.S. requests for banking information in its anti-terror investigations. SWIFT, or the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, operates a secure electronic messaging service used by some 7,800 financial institutions to make international money transfers worth $6 trillion a day.
SWIFT, not to be confused with SMERSH or SPECTER.
Thuer said the issue was whether information could be passed on to states whose data protection laws are not as stringent as those in Switzerland. Referring to a report by a Belgian privacy commission, Thuer urged that a solution be negotiated by which U.S. laws and European data protection rules are standardized.

Last month, Switzerland Finance Minister Hans-Rudolf Merz said giving the CIA access to the SWIFT information did not infringe Swiss sovereignty or the country's banking secrecy rules.
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC || 10/15/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Lebanon savoring the Hizbollah "victory"
Samir Jaja, an unconventional Christian politician in Lebanon., has been making some strong speeches against Hizbollah lately. Apparently this is resonating with Christian Lebanese, and some Sunni are beginning to pay attention too. It's generally forgotten that, in early July, just before Hizbollah made their raid into Israel, Lebanese legislators were trying to disarm the Shia terrorist organization. Hizbollah, to most Lebanese, is an unpleasant reminder of the fifteen year civil war (1975-90) that tore the country part. That one was started by Palestinian refugees getting involved in Lebanese politics, for their benefit, not Lebanon's. This time around, we have Iran and Syria pulling the strings, via Hizbollah. The country (minus Hizbollah) rose up last year and forced the Syrians to withdraw their troops from Hizbollah territory. Now, after savoring the Hizbollah "victory," and looking at what it's going to cost to pay for it, the Christian/Sunni/Druze are again focusing on getting rid of Hizbollah, and any more of these "victories."
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC || 10/15/2006 10:38 || Comments || Link || [7 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Oooohhh shit! Anymore victories like this and we'll be back in the 1800's.
Posted by: SpecOp35 || 10/15/2006 14:00 Comments || Top||

#2  One more such victory, and I am undone.
Posted by: General Pyrrhus || 10/15/2006 15:44 Comments || Top||

#3  That is certainly the media spin, but the Lebs pay the price whether Reuters and the Beeb acknowledge the bill or not.

Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy || 10/15/2006 19:59 Comments || Top||

#4  Either the puppets begin to disentangle themselves or learn to enjoy being endlessly jerked around. I doubt they have sufficient perspicacity to appreciate Israel's tutelage on the subject.
Posted by: Zenster || 10/15/2006 20:19 Comments || Top||

#5  AC! Woohoo! Welcome back! You've been sorely missed, my friend. Grins and Regards!
Posted by: .com || 10/15/2006 20:40 Comments || Top||

#6  Welcome back, AC.
Posted by: Pappy || 10/15/2006 20:49 Comments || Top||

#7  :-) ditto
Posted by: Frank G || 10/15/2006 21:07 Comments || Top||

#8  Many thanks, guys. It's good to be back, virtually as well as physically. I have been in none other than Iraq itself for most of the past ten months, (civilian contract rather than military).
It was possible to post from there, of course, but I was very busy and it was inconvenient (to say the least) at many of our operating venues.

I was working for a certain well-known servant and co-conspirator of the Great Satan, helping the Iraqis get and keep their pipelines going. It is not an easy job since they were favorite targets for Zark's boys and various freelance saboteurs.
With reliable oil income, the new government will not be in the same boat as South Vietnam if the Dems win Congress and pull the plug on US involvement. The left will be crestfallen if they force a US withdrawal and Malaki's forces are still able to defeat the insurgency, as they might well be if US controls on their methodology were removed.
I was in Mosul, btw, when news came of Zarqawi's demise. People literally danced in the streets, and apparently did so all over Iraq. I did get satellite TV but didn't see a word about this from the usual suspects.
I was convinced before I went that the MSM were lying to us about Iraq, but I was willing to keep an open mind and see for myself. I saw, and the MSM deception is if anything much worse and more pervasive than even I had suspected. Among coalition troops and Iraqi security people, foreign journalists are universally regarded as insurgent spies and saboteurs.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy || 10/15/2006 21:17 Comments || Top||

#9  Wow, AC - that's great! Mosul was (is?) damned hot. You didn't happen to run across Yon's buddies in Deuce-Four, did ya?

So your time toiling in the Permian area's upper education zone, lol, was based upon industry expertise... I shoulda guessed, but you always declined specifics regards your professorial duties. Was it a leave of absence (i.e. you'll return to TT) or a change of pace, meaning you're a contract kind 'o guy, now?

Glad you did your part and came back safe! Feel free, very free, lol, to share any anecdotes you have. I would certainly enjoy them - whether the mundane daily things or some thrilling adventure.

Again, very happy to have you back - virtually and physically, lol. :-)
Posted by: .com || 10/15/2006 21:56 Comments || Top||

#10  HOOAH, AC. Very good to have you back.
Posted by: lotp || 10/15/2006 21:56 Comments || Top||

#11  I was in Mosul, btw, when news came of Zarqawi's demise. People literally danced in the streets, and apparently did so all over Iraq.

Another big welcome home, AC. Thank you for your contribution in Iraq. That's one interesting little piece of news there. The media would just as soon have had us all believing that they held a state funeral for the maggot. I'm really looking forward to more of your firsthand insights whenever time or security agreements allow.
Posted by: Zenster || 10/15/2006 22:05 Comments || Top||


Aoun met Nasrallah and plans to hold a rally on Sunday
General Michel Aoun disclosed in an interview published Saturday that he has met Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah right after the end of the war of aggression on Lebanon that devastated the country. He described the meeting as "not ordinary" and "very warm, particularly because there is a special sentiment between him (Nasrallah) and I." But Aoun did not disclose where he met Nasrallah or what they have discussed.

Aoun said that there were two forces pulling the country in different directions. "A popular force that enjoys vivid strength and determination to rebuild the country; and a political force which still dominates the Lebanese decision-making," he explained, in a clear reference to the March 14 Forces from one side, and Hezbollah and Aoun's Free Patriotic Movement on the other.
Nasrallah has gone into hiding since the Israel-Hezbollah war that was sparked on July 12 by the group's kidnapping of two soldiers in a deadly cross-border raid. But the Hezbollah Secretary General has only once appeared in public at a "divine victory rally" in Beirut's southern suburbs last month.

Aoun's remarks came in an interview with As-Safir daily published Saturday. On his opinion of a national dialogue, Aoun said that there were two forces pulling the country in different directions. "A popular force that enjoys vivid strength and determination to rebuild the country; and a political force which still dominates the Lebanese decision-making," he explained, in a clear reference to the March 14 Forces from one side, and Hezbollah and Aoun's Free Patriotic Movement on the other.

However the former army general expressed willingness to "sit together … unconditionally" with parliament's majority leader Saad Hariri and PSP chief Walid Jumblatt, Aoun's major foes.

Aoun also slammed the Taef accord which has put an end to the 1975-1990 Lebanese civil war, accusing it of trimming the Christians. "That (Taef) accord had margined half the Lebanese, which means it had margined all the Christians; and we will not accept to remain margined," Aoun said.

Aoun was skeptical about taking part in a national unity government, "because by the mere participation in such a government I will be inheriting 15 previous yeas that have led to all the collapse." This is contrary to Hezbollah’s call for including Aoun in a new government Aoun and Nasrallah have been repeatedly calling for the resignation of Premier Fouad Siniora's government and the formation of a national unity government.
Posted by: Fred || 10/15/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Nasrallah has gone into hiding since the Israel-Hezbollah war heh! Come on IDF ...if Aoun could find him....
Posted by: anon || 10/15/2006 5:02 Comments || Top||


Germany: Iran talks can't be successful at present
Germany's foreign minister said there is currently no prospect of successful talks with Iran on its nuclear program, but stressed in an interview broadcast Saturday that an incentives package aimed at defusing the issue remains on the table.

"We do not at the moment have a situation in which negotiations can be held with prospects of success, so the (UN) Security Council must take up its efforts" to work toward possible sanctions, Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said on Inforadio. "But we have made equally clear that our offer for cooperation with Iran remains on the table," Steinmeier added, referring to the conclusions of an Oct. 6 meeting of foreign ministers from the five permanent Security Council members and Germany. "That means: we are ready to return to the negotiating table any time if Iran declares its readiness to accept the conditions for negotiations," he said.
Posted by: Fred || 10/15/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:

#1  "Yes, sadly it is true, our talks have not yet yielded the hoped-for results. All parties are exhausted from the strenuous efforts invested in this important work - so a break is in order. We suggest a nice long resort stay in Bavaria. After some excellent skiing, massages and mud baths, and some glorious beer und schnitzel, we will reconvene and try again in the Spring. I'm already clearing my schedule for another three years of intense rejection and humiliation."
--Frank-Walter "Kick Me" Steinmeier, Dhimmitude Minister
Posted by: .com || 10/15/2006 0:38 Comments || Top||

#2  Dear Allah, what are we supposed to do? On the one hand, Iran. On the other, North Korea. In between: Iraq and Afghanistan. Possible threats on horizon include an Islamofascist takeover of Pakistan and confrontation with China.

US army is STRONG but you can only spread butter over so much bread before it gets too thin...
Posted by: anon1 || 10/15/2006 1:56 Comments || Top||

#3  I think you Germans better refer to plot maps and see if you're within the flight capability of Taepodong-2. If they get it functioning, I believe it can strike anywhere within Germany from Iranian launch zones . This is why you better stop the hot air and start sobering up. Or do you think you've supplied so much technology to Iran that they wouldn't dare strike you ???
Posted by: SpecOp35 || 10/15/2006 14:08 Comments || Top||


Spanish FM in Syria for talks
DAMASCUS - Spanish Foreign Minister Miguel Angel Moratinos, who drew US criticism earlier this year for ignoring its efforts to sideline Syria, arrived in Damascus on an unannounced visit Saturday.

Moratinos, who is also a former EU peace envoy to the region, was welcomed at the airport by his Syrian counterpart Walid Muallem, an AFP correspondent witnessed. The Spanish minister was due to hold a news conference Sunday morning following talks with Syrian officials including President Bashar Al Assad but there was no immediate word on their agenda.

In early August, during negotiations leading up to the UN truce resolution that brought an end to a month of fighting in Lebanon between Israel and the Syrian-backed militants of Hezbollah, Moratinos travelled to Damascus for talks on the European Union’s behalf. That visit was the first by a senior Western official since Moratinos’s previous trip in March, which drew strong US criticism at the time.
Posted by: Steve White || 10/15/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:



Who's in the News
82[untagged]
1[untagged]

Bookmark
E-Mail Me

The Classics
The O Club
Rantburg Store
The Bloids
The Never-ending Story
Thugburg
Gulf War I
The Way We Were
Bio

Merry-Go-Blog











On Sale now!


A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.

Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.

Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has dominated Mexico for six years.
Click here for more information

Meet the Mods
In no particular order...
Steve White
Seafarious
tu3031
badanov
sherry
ryuge
GolfBravoUSMC
Bright Pebbles
trailing wife
Gloria
Fred
Besoeker
Glenmore
Frank G
3dc
Skidmark

Two weeks of WOT
Sun 2006-10-15
  UN imposes stringent NKor sanctions
Sat 2006-10-14
  Pak foils coup plot
Fri 2006-10-13
  Suspect pleads guilty to terrorist plot in US, Britain
Thu 2006-10-12
  Gadahn indicted for treason
Wed 2006-10-11
  Two Muslims found guilty in Albany sting case
Tue 2006-10-10
  China cancels troop leave along North Korean border
Mon 2006-10-09
  China denounces "brazen" North Korea nuclear test
Sun 2006-10-08
  North Korea Tests Nuclear Weapon
Sat 2006-10-07
  Pakistan admits 'helping' Kashmir militancy
Fri 2006-10-06
  Islamists set up central Islamic court in Mogadishu
Thu 2006-10-05
  Fatah Threatens to Murder Hamas Leaders
Wed 2006-10-04
  Pa. man charged with trying to help al-Qaida attack refineries
Tue 2006-10-03
  Hamas Closes Paleogovernment
Mon 2006-10-02
  Ex-ISI officials may be helping Taliban
Sun 2006-10-01
  PKK declare unilateral ceasefire


Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
18.191.171.235
Help keep the Burg running! Paypal:
WoT Operations (22)    Non-WoT (11)    Opinion (11)    Local News (10)    (0)