Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 03/04/2007 View Sat 03/03/2007 View Fri 03/02/2007 View Thu 03/01/2007 View Wed 02/28/2007 View Tue 02/27/2007 View Mon 02/26/2007
1
2007-03-04 Home Front: Politix
Let's Make a Deal
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by ryuge 2007-03-04 06:55|| || Front Page|| [7 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 sorry, but Rudy has to change on guns - otehrwise, no. I'm OK other than that, and would welcome his backbone on the WOT
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2007-03-04 07:23||   2007-03-04 07:23|| Front Page Top

#2 When the house begins to burn down, the question of who can capably man the water buckets usually takes precedence over other, long-standing arguments.
Posted by Thromoger Thrumble5163 2007-03-04 08:07||   2007-03-04 08:07|| Front Page Top

#3 The only litmus test now is the defense of civilization. Yes, we should choose the best candidate from amongst those who will take up the sword but only from amongst those who will take up the sword.
Posted by Excalibur 2007-03-04 08:10||   2007-03-04 08:10|| Front Page Top

#4 I heard Rudy recently talk about his stance on guns w/Bill O'Reilley. He must be coming more center on that issue because he didn't sound at all moonbatty to me about it (& I'm a NRA lifetime member). If guns is the only issue and it's Rudy versus McCain than I go w/Rudy. McCain has been too weak on the border and too unstable on just about everything else.
Posted by Broadhead6 in Iraq 2007-03-04 09:14||   2007-03-04 09:14|| Front Page Top

#5 BH6, can you elaborate on that?
Posted by mac 2007-03-04 14:18||   2007-03-04 14:18|| Front Page Top

#6 Agree that Rudy's stance wrt the 2nd Amendment will be critical. We know the Dhims intend to disarm the populace. I won't vote for a Trunk that isn't clearly for civilian ownership of firearms - even if he seems to get it on the WOT. I do not believe that I can trust the government to protect my family as it currently exists.
Posted by SR-71 2007-03-04 15:24||   2007-03-04 15:24|| Front Page Top

#7 for my vote and cash Giuliani must promise [no homilies]

1a) back strong second amendment rights

1b) deport the illegals/ no amnesty

2) stop socialized medicine/ the pols keep promising more benefits from the same pool of cash. The assholes insist on including more and more people for benefits even though they never paid one dime into the system.

Sure as sh*t the benefits for those of us who paid into the system will be cut; whether they are Private Pensions, the VA, Medicare and Social Security, just to cover the blank checks these political criminals keep floating.
Posted by RD 2007-03-04 18:38||   2007-03-04 18:38|| Front Page Top

#8 For Giuliani to get My vote, he needs to be running in the election against a DemocRat. Actually, they would work with Romney. Come to think of it, Gingrich, too. McCain, maybe.
Posted by Jackal">Jackal  2007-03-04 20:17|| http://home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html]">[http://home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html]  2007-03-04 20:17|| Front Page Top

#9 McCain is just Clinton without the intern. I will never vote for another guy who needs the media for public therapy.
Posted by SR-71 2007-03-04 21:14||   2007-03-04 21:14|| Front Page Top

#10 #2: When the house begins to burn down, the question of who can capably man the water buckets usually takes precedence over other, long-standing arguments.

But NOT from those who wish to destroy all water pumps, and consficate the water buckets claiming ""We're all safer without those dangerous things that could be used to drown people"
Posted by Redneck Jim 2007-03-04 21:22||   2007-03-04 21:22|| Front Page Top

#11 And after all those buckets can be used to smash somebody's head in. So get rid of them all, imprison anyone even trying to use a bucket, and if anyone even eays "Buckets are not dangerous, people are" you must immediately arrest that dangerous "Bucket Promoter"

Get the point?
Posted by Redneck Jim 2007-03-04 21:27||   2007-03-04 21:27|| Front Page Top

#12 OTOH, there's Dem POTUS candidate CHRIS DODD > belabeled MOUD a "Thug" whose a de facto threat to the Region + World, ergo Amer must redeploy = retreat, andor withdraw, get out of the region.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2007-03-04 22:14||   2007-03-04 22:14|| Front Page Top

21:24 Aris Katsaris
11:23 somesaynop
09:20 Gonzadexproshoot
23:50 Zenster
23:39 Throger Thains8048
23:13 JosephMendiola
23:09 JosephMendiola
23:02 Anonymoose
22:59 mhw
22:58 JosephMendiola
22:57 RD
22:56 Zhang Fei
22:55 whatadeal
22:48 Sneaze
22:48 JosephMendiola
22:32 JosephMendiola
22:29 RWV
22:21 JosephMendiola
22:16 RD
22:15 RD
22:14 JosephMendiola
21:47 Barbara Skolaut
21:45 mac
21:44 Frank G









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com