Article

2007-03-04 Fifth Column

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Dave D. 2007-03-04 12:58|| || Front Page|| [6 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 The sooner the Sulz bunch gets bankrupt, the better off we'll all be. They're all traitors who make it very clear they hate America. If I saw the Black Marias taking the lot of their editorial staff away to Gitmo I'd be cheering at the top of my lungs.

Posted by mac 2007-03-04 13:23|| 2007-03-04 13:23|| Front Page Top

#2 How 'bout this simple definition - shoot at or even threaten any American anywhere, and we smoke your whole clan. Of course, in the in-bred arab middle east, that means pretty much all of 'em. Works for me...

Posted by M. Murcek">M. Murcek 2007-03-04 14:47|| 2007-03-04 14:47|| Front Page Top

#3 Ban Extraordinary Rendition

Created by the Clinton Administration

Tighten the Definition of Combatant

Er, wouldn't this reinforce the administration's position that al'Qaeda and other jihadis are not subject to GC protections?

Or is the NYT using a different definition of "tighten" than the rest of the English-speaking world?

Posted by Rob Crawford">Rob Crawford 2007-03-04 15:03|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/] 2007-03-04 15:03|| Front Page Top

#4 "Five years of presidential overreaching and Congressional collaboration continue to exact a high toll in human lives, Americas global reputation and the architecture of democracy."

Arthur Sulzberger is all for democracy -- he just doesn't like that part where duly elected representatives in the Congress, Senate, and Presidency don't do it his way.

Posted by Darrell 2007-03-04 16:59|| 2007-03-04 16:59|| Front Page Top

#5 And I'm looking and I'm looking and...I don't see win the war in here any place.
Just an oversight, I'm sure...

Posted by tu3031 2007-03-04 20:30|| 2007-03-04 20:30|| Front Page Top

#6 Tighten the Definition of Combatant

How about this: The editors and reporters of the New York Times (and other MSM media) who regularly publish state secrets and do all they can to encourage our enemies and harm the moral of our troops are ILLEGAL combatants. They are actively and knowingly working for the enemy. They do not wear a badge or uniform announcing that they are combatants, and they hide in the civilian population.

And as such can be executed in the field.

Posted by CrazyFool 2007-03-04 21:18|| 2007-03-04 21:18|| Front Page Top

#7 Mac, no need to take them all the way to Gitmo when there are landfills in Jersey with space available.

Posted by RWV 2007-03-04 22:29|| 2007-03-04 22:29|| Front Page Top

#8 I learned years ago that the New York Times wants me dead, and wants you dead.

Posted by whatadeal 2007-03-04 22:55|| 2007-03-04 22:55|| Front Page Top

21:24 Aris Katsaris
11:23 somesaynop
09:20 Gonzadexproshoot
23:50 Zenster
23:39 Throger Thains8048
23:13 JosephMendiola
23:09 JosephMendiola
23:02 Anonymoose
22:59 mhw
22:58 JosephMendiola
22:57 RD
22:56 Zhang Fei
22:55 whatadeal
22:48 Sneaze
22:48 JosephMendiola
22:32 JosephMendiola
22:29 RWV
22:21 JosephMendiola
22:16 RD
22:15 RD
22:14 JosephMendiola
21:47 Barbara Skolaut
21:45 mac
21:44 Frank G