Article

2007-03-04 Home Front: WoT

Just how nice to the terrorists do we have to be?

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Thinemp Whimble2412 2007-03-04 12:29|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Just how nice to the terrorists do we have to be?

Kill Them Politely?

Posted by Redneck Jim 2007-03-04 17:58|| 2007-03-04 17:58|| Front Page Top

#2 Just how nice to the terrorists do we have to be?

Only nice enough to make all their dreams of martyrdom come true.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-03-04 18:07|| 2007-03-04 18:07|| Front Page Top

#3 Heh ZEN good to see ya back! ;-)

Posted by RD 2007-03-04 18:13|| 2007-03-04 18:13|| Front Page Top

#4 Here is exactly how nice we all have to be -

We have to die!

Not even total conversion of our entire populations and submission of our governments to Islam and abject national abeyance and obescience before Ayatollah Khomenei's Iranian Revolution will be enough for some of these murderous animals.

They will kill millions, maybe billions, if we let them, in the name of Islam and take the entire world back to 700 AD.

A world with no electricity, no cures for disease, no science, medicine, healthcare, no space programs, no dreams of bettering oneself ever except for the ruling elite (ie the mullahs).

A world of death, disease, poverty, mass executions, barbaric punishments for trivial crimes, racial hatred and ethnic cleansing, and the uneducated masses of pathetic survivors scratching out a living against a bleak and blasted landscape.

That's exactly how "nice" we have to be to the terrorists.

The power of their hatred is so strong that the choices are clear on how we have to act. This is harsh, but I am convinced that it is true - we must kill them or conquer them or they will conquer us and kill us!

I no longer believe that there can be any sort of reconcilation or accommodation between civilization and those I have come to believe are barbarians barely removed from a state of complete animalism.

Again, we must become wolves!

We've been acting like monkeys for far too long already.

Posted by FOTSGreg">FOTSGreg 2007-03-04 18:37|| www.fire-on-the-suns.com]">[www.fire-on-the-suns.com] 2007-03-04 18:37|| Front Page Top

#5 They will kill millions, maybe billions, if we let them, in the name of Islam and take the entire world back to 700 AD.

My Iranian friend and I agree that something on the order of half this world's entire population will perish with the advent of a global caliphate.

I invite you to do the math. Do we lose three billion of this world's general population or one billion of its Muslims?

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-03-04 20:02|| 2007-03-04 20:02|| Front Page Top

#6 There were approximately 70 million Germans and 70 million Japanese at the start of WWII. Zenster would have killed them all. Think about it.

Posted by Darrell 2007-03-04 20:41|| 2007-03-04 20:41|| Front Page Top

#7 Okay answer5 this, "What percentage of Germany's population did we and other Allies Kill, as compared to what percentage of Germany's population did the Nazi party under the late unlamented Adolf Sthickelgruber kill?
Simply put who was the more deadly? My bet is Adolf and company.

That's what we face now, unrestrained "Nazism," or Squash the Facists now.

Posted by Redneck Jim 2007-03-04 21:16|| 2007-03-04 21:16|| Front Page Top

#8 Of the 70 million Germans, 11% died from all causes inflicted by both sides. So the question is:
"Should the Allies have killed the 62 million German survivors too?" Zenster's logic would say "yes".

Posted by Darrell 2007-03-04 21:31|| 2007-03-04 21:31|| Front Page Top

#9 not sure, but I think Zen was just using stats/numbers to expose the disparity in numbers. most likely not suggesting the literal death of all Muslims.

your point is taken tho Darrell for it focuses on the distinction, we must never become savages.

Zen is quite capable of answering himself so I'll shut up.

Posted by RD 2007-03-04 22:57|| 2007-03-04 22:57|| Front Page Top

#10 To take Darrell's reasoning to its logical conclusion, we must allow the slaughter of 3 billion people in order to avoid harming however many ostensibly moderate Muslims there might be lurking among Islam's 1 billion adherents. If he is to interpret my statement as he does, we must interpret what he say in exactly the same fashion.

What happens if there are no moderate Muslims? Time and again this continues to arise as a potential fact. Will we let 3 billion die for fear of killing a few million or hundred thousand moderates? The safety and the security of the West must be foremost above all other considerations. Moderate Muslims must take back their religion by force or face up to the fact that they are indistinguishable from the terrorists.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-03-04 23:50|| 2007-03-04 23:50|| Front Page Top

21:24 Aris Katsaris
11:23 somesaynop
09:20 Gonzadexproshoot
23:50 Zenster
23:39 Throger Thains8048
23:13 JosephMendiola
23:09 JosephMendiola
23:02 Anonymoose
22:59 mhw
22:58 JosephMendiola
22:57 RD
22:56 Zhang Fei
22:55 whatadeal
22:48 Sneaze
22:48 JosephMendiola
22:32 JosephMendiola
22:29 RWV
22:21 JosephMendiola
22:16 RD
22:15 RD
22:14 JosephMendiola
21:47 Barbara Skolaut
21:45 mac
21:44 Frank G