Archived material Access restricted Article

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 03/09/2006 View Wed 03/08/2006 View Tue 03/07/2006 View Mon 03/06/2006 View Sun 03/05/2006 View Sat 03/04/2006 View Fri 03/03/2006
2006-03-09 Home Front: Politix
Hillary Double-Crosses DNC Before They Can Double-Cross Her
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Anonymoose 2006-03-09 18:58|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [6498 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Interesting to see two competing databases with two competing messages. Also, $10 million isn't getting the job done (particularly if he uses union labor).
Posted by DoDo 2006-03-09 19:15||   2006-03-09 19:15|| Front Page Top

#2 We're seeing what could be the splitting of the Democrats into the left and left-of-moderate wings - I'll bet they both try to retain the title of "The Democratic Party" though - Lord knows why....
Posted by Glaith Snuger5196 2006-03-09 19:54||   2006-03-09 19:54|| Front Page Top

#3 I picture a snake in a circle devouring itself by the tail.... :-D
Posted by Barbara Skolaut">Barbara Skolaut  2006-03-09 20:58||]">[]  2006-03-09 20:58|| Front Page Top

#4 a snake in a circle devouring itself by the tail

Posted by DMFD 2006-03-09 21:48||   2006-03-09 21:48|| Front Page Top

#5 This is a major mistake by Hillary. IMHO, this will cost her the far left, that doesn't much like her anyway, the libertarians and will make anyone slightly left of center realize what a ambitious power hungry witch she is, willing to fry up live babies on TV if it would get her elected.

She will still get the party faithful - who would still vote for her even if she did fry up live babies.

I agree with Rove, she'll get the nomination - but this association with Soros and data mining for pure political purposes will be close to fatal in the 2008 election.
Posted by 2b 2006-03-09 22:39||   2006-03-09 22:39|| Front Page Top

#6 Is this legal? It's data mining, isn't it -- like what the NSC was doing?
Posted by trailing wife 2006-03-09 22:58||   2006-03-09 22:58|| Front Page Top

#7 one would hope so, tw. But I think it's legal because democrats are doing it. Like lying under oath, inciting hate speech, and publishing slander.
Posted by 2b 2006-03-09 23:05||   2006-03-09 23:05|| Front Page Top

#8 This been going on since 2000. HRC was developing independent lines of funding on the West Coast, the others (like Ickes) lots of connections.

There could be a coup within the Democratic Party.

But my money is on the formation of a lean 'independent'(replacement/substitute Democrat) party. In either case a sub-contracted (and controlled) 'party mechanism' will already be up and running.
Posted by Pappy 2006-03-09 23:20||   2006-03-09 23:20|| Front Page Top

00:04 .com
00:00 Nana
23:53 .com
23:52 Alaska Paul in Hooper Bay, AK
23:50 Nana
23:47 Nana
23:47 Alaska Paul in Hooper Bay, AK
23:44 Nana
23:42 Frank G
23:40 Frank G
23:40 Nana
23:40 Al Gore
23:38 Frank G
23:37 twobyfour
23:36 Frank G
23:30 Alaska Paul in Hooper Bay, AK
23:29 Rafael
23:28 badanov
23:27 .com
23:25 Ulaigum Ebbereck6419
23:20 Pappy
23:18 .com
23:17 .com
23:11 Frank G

Search WWW Search